Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Pilot Study on the Application of Employee Scheduling for the Problem of Safety Instrumented System Design and Maintenance Planning for Remotely Located Oil and Gas Facilities

Open Access
|Mar 2019

References

  1. van den Bergh, J., Beliën, J., De Bruecker, P., Demeulemeester, E., & De Boeck, L. (2013). Personnel scheduling: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3), 367-385. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.02910.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.029
  2. Bourmistrov, A., Mellemvik, F., Bambulyak, A., Gudmestad, O., Overland, I., & Zolotukhin A. (Eds.). (2015). International Arctic Petroleum Cooperation: Barents Sea scenarios. New York, United States: Routledge.10.4324/9781315768762
  3. Bukowski, J. (2006). Incorporating process demand into models for assessment of safety system performance. Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 2006, RAMS’06 Annual, 577-581. IEEE. doi: 10.1109/RAMS.2006.167743510.1109/RAMS.2006.1677435
  4. Castillo-Salazar, J. A., Landa-Silva, D. & Qu, R. (2016). Workforce scheduling and routing problems: literature survey and computational study. Annals of Operations Research, 239(1), 39-67. doi: 10.1007/s10479-014-1687-210.1007/s10479-014-1687-2
  5. Centre for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS). (2010). Guidelines for Safe Process Operations and Maintenance. New York, United States: John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Closed Joint-Stock Company Scientific Technical Center of Industrial Safety Problems Research (STC Industrial safety). (2014). Federal law On industrial safety of hazardous production facilities. Moscow, Russia: STC Industrial safety CJSC.
  7. Dantzig, G. B. (1954). Letter to the editor - A comment on Edie's “Traffic delays at toll booths”. Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 2(3), 339-341. doi: 10.1287/opre.2.3.33910.1287/opre.2.3.339
  8. Helber, S., & Henken, K. (2010). Profit-oriented shift scheduling of inbound contact centers with skills-based routing, impatient customers, and retrials. OR Spectrum, 32(1), 109-134. doi: 10.1007/s00291-008-0141-810.1007/s00291-008-0141-8
  9. International Electrotechnical Commission (IЕC). (1997). 61508 Functional safety of electrical / electronic / programmable electronic safety-related systems. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC.
  10. International Electrotechnical Commission (IЕC). (2003). 61511 Functional safety – safety instrumented system for the process industry sector. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC.
  11. Jin, H., Lundteigen, M. A., & Rausand, M., (2011). Reliability performance of safety instrumented systems: A common approach for both low-and high-demand mode of operation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(3), 365–373. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.11.00710.1016/j.ress.2010.11.007
  12. Kuo, W., & Zuo, M.J. (2003). Optimal reliability modeling. Principles and applications. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: John Wiley & Sons.
  13. The Norwegian Oil and Gas Association. (2001). 070 – Application of IEC61508 and IEC61511 in the Norwegian Petroleum Industry, Sandnes, Norway: Norwegian Oil and Gas.
  14. Redutskiy, Y. (2017). Optimization of safety instrumented system design and maintenance frequency for oil and gas industry processes. Management and Production Engineering Review, 8(1), 46-59. doi: 10.1515/mper-2017-0006.10.1515/mper-2017-0006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2018-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2543-912X | Journal ISSN: 2543-6597
Language: English
Page range: 55 - 64
Submitted on: Sep 5, 2018
Accepted on: Dec 15, 2018
Published on: Mar 28, 2019
Published by: Bialystok University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2019 Yury Redutskiy, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.