Examining the difference in attitudes towards euthanasia tourism according to income level_
| Income Level | N |
| SD | Sig. | Source of the Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Euthanasia General Attitude | 20,001 ₺–30,000 ₺a | 64 | 3.2288 | .90498 | 0.000 |
|
| 30,001 ₺–40,000 ₺b | 55 | 3.6754 | .84945 | |||
| 40,001 ₺ and morec | 305 | 3.9314 | .62358 | |||
| Perception of Euthanasia | 20,001 ₺–30,000 ₺a | 64 | 3.2136 | 1.11464 | 0.000 |
|
| 30,001 ₺–40,000 ₺b | 55 | 3.6095 | 1.14192 | |||
| 40,001 ₺ and morec | 305 | 3.9403 | .79793 | |||
| Euthanasia Prediction | 20,001 ₺–30,000 ₺a | 64 | 3.0532 | .96255 | 0.000 |
|
| 30,001 ₺–40,000 ₺b | 55 | 3.6345 | .82890 | |||
| 40,001 ₺ and morec | 305 | 3.8517 | .63151 | |||
| Social Values | 20,001 ₺–30,000 ₺a | 64 | 3.8802 | .83014 | 0.003 | c>a (p=0.002) |
| 30,001 ₺–40,000 ₺b | 55 | 4.0970 | .57260 | |||
| 40,001 ₺ and morec | 305 | 4.1585 | .53121 | |||
Examining the differences in attitude towards euthanasia tourism according to one’s position within the institution_
| Position in the Institution | N |
| SD | Sig. | Source of the Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Euthanasia General Attitude | Faculty Membera | 168 | 3.8974 | .69763 | 0.000 |
|
| Specialist Physicianb | 125 | 3.8761 | .65563 | |||
| Resident Physicianc | 131 | 3.5770 | .84290 | |||
| Perception of Euthanasia | Faculty Membera | 168 | 3.9128 | .88647 | 0.001 |
|
| Specialist Physicianb | 125 | 3.8903 | .83970 | |||
| Resident Physicianc | 131 | 3.5294 | 1.04083 | |||
| Euthanasia Prediction | Faculty Membera | 168 | 3.8246 | .71095 | 0.001 |
|
| Specialist Physicianb | 125 | 3.7558 | .67405 | |||
| Resident Physicianc | 131 | 3.4968 | .88397 | |||
Examining the variation in attitudes towards euthanasia tourism based on work experience_
| Work Experience | N |
| SD | Sig. | Source of the Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Euthanasia General Attitude | 0–10 yearsa | 157 | 3.6852 | .79464 | 0.020 | b>a (p=0.014) |
| 11–20 yearsb | 114 | 3.9417 | .55793 | |||
| 21 and more | 153 | 3.7905 | .80181 | |||
| Perception of Euthanasia | 0–10 yearsa | 157 | 3.6268 | 1.01389 | 0.009 | b>a (p=0.007) |
| 11–20 yearsb | 114 | 3.9764 | .67017 | |||
| 21 and more | 153 | 3.8123 | 1.00280 | |||
The examination of the differences in attitudes towards euthanasia tourism according to the clinic where the physicians work_
| Working Clinic | N |
| SD | Sig. | Source of the Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Euthanasia General Attitude | Emergency Departmenta | 85 | 3.83 | .662 | 0.000 |
|
| Internal Medicine Departmentb | 89 | 3.59 | .930 | |||
| Surgical Departmentc | 152 | 3.97 | .565 | |||
| Intensive Cared | 67 | 3.98 | .549 | |||
| Othere | 31 | 2.97 | .864 | |||
| Perception of Euthanasia | Emergency Departmenta | 85 | 3.82 | .837 | 0.000 |
|
| Internal Medicine Departmentb | 89 | 3.51 | 1.210 | |||
| Surgical Departmentc | 152 | 4.01 | .693 | |||
| Intensive Cared | 67 | 4.03 | .647 | |||
| Othere | 31 | 2.86 | 1.146 | |||
| Euthanasia Prediction | Emergency Departmenta | 85 | 3.74 | .633 | 0.000 |
|
| Internal Medicine Departmentb | 89 | 3.54 | .883 | |||
| Surgical Departmentc | 152 | 3.89 | .638 | |||
| Intensive Cared | 67 | 3.87 | .624 | |||
| Othere | 31 | 2.84 | .978 | |||
The average scores of Turkish physicians’ attitudes towards euthanasia tourism_
|
| SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Perception of Euthanasia | 1. Just as individuals are given the right to live, in some cases, the right to die should also be granted | 3.92 | 1.15 |
| 2. I support euthanasia | 3.79 | 1.18 | |
| 3. If I were to be diagnosed with an incurable terminal illness, I would like to have euthanasia applied to myself. | 3.59 | 1.22 | |
| 4. Granting the right to die to individuals with incurable illnesses instead of making them suffer is an ethical situation | 3.87 | 1.14 | |
| 5. I support euthanasia tourism | 3.69 | 1.21 | |
| 6. Euthanasia is equivalent to murder. | 1.63 | 1.05 | |
| 7. Euthanasia should not be an alternative for incurable diseases. | 2.32 | 1.19 | |
| 8. Euthanasia is equivalent to suicide. | 1.82 | 1.18 | |
| 9. I support the euthanasia requests of our country’s citizens. | 3.73 | 1.12 | |
| 10. I support the euthanasia requests of foreign tourists. | 3.81 | 1.14 | |
| 11. If euthanasia tourism were legal in Turkey, I would fulfil the requests of individuals who want to undergo euthanasia within the framework of legal requirements | 3.76 | 1.18 | |
| 12. Euthanasia may become legal in Turkey in the next 10 years | 3.00 | 1.22 | |
| 13.Since euthanasia is legal in only a limited number of countries, there may be a travel mobility to regions where euthanasia is legal worldwide. | 3.85 | .97 | |
| Euthanasia Prediction | Dimension of the Perception of Euthanasia: 3,29±0,64 | ||
| 14. Travel made within the scope of euthanasia increases tourism revenues | 3.87 | 1.12 | |
| 15. Euthanasia tourism can be seen as a stage of medical tourism | 3.74 | 1.11 | |
| 16. If euthanasia were legal, there would be an increase in travel demand to Turkey for this purpose | 3.98 | .97 | |
| 17. Euthanasia can be seen as a solution instead of palliative care | 3.75 | 1.14 | |
| 18. If euthanasia tourism becomes legal, I will perform voluntary euthanasia | 3.62 | 1.22 | |
| 19. If euthanasia tourism is legalised, I will perform the non-volunteer (decision taken based on the request of the first-degree relatives of the patient without consulting the patient) type of euthanasia. | 3.11 | 1.12 | |
| 20. If euthanasia were legal in Turkey, the number of for-profit healthcare institutions would increase | 3.97 | .89 | |
| 21. If euthanasia were legal in Turkey, healthcare workers would have the psychological competence for euthanasia. | 2.96 | 1.02 | |
| 22. If euthanasia were legal in Turkey, hospitals would have the necessary equipment for euthanasia | 3.63 | .95 | |
| 23. An individual requesting euthanasia must undergo psychological tests | 4.40 | .83 | |
| Social Values | The Dimension of Euthanasia Prediction: 3,70±0,77 | ||
| 24. Culture is effective in the fact that euthanasia is not legal in our country. | 3.95 | .75 | |
| 25. Lifestyle is effective in making euthanasia legal in our country. | 3.77 | .78 | |
| 26. Religion is effective in the fact that euthanasia is not legal in our country. | 4.61 | .83 | |
| Dimension of Social Values:4.11±0,60 | |||
| Euthanasia General: 3.54±0,60 |
Examination of the difference in attitude towards euthanasia tourism according to age_
| Age | N |
| SD | Sig. | Source of the Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Euthanasia General Attitude | 22–39a | 163 | 3.6468 | .84554 | 0.000 |
|
| 40–59b | 157 | 3.7908 | .71815 | |||
| 60 and morec | 104 | 4.0220 | .54446 | |||
| Perception of Euthanasia | 22–39a | 163 | 3.5919 | 1.08194 | 0.000 |
|
| 40–59b | 157 | 3.7803 | .90090 | |||
| 60 and morec | 104 | 4.1057 | .61664 | |||
| Euthanasia Prediction | 22–39a | 163 | 3.5692 | .82615 | 0.003 | c>a (p=0.002) |
| 40–59b | 157 | 3.7111 | .77853 | |||
| 60 and morec | 104 | 3.9006 | .61235 | |||
Examining the differences in attitude towards euthanasia tourism based on gender, marital status, and education level_
| Gender, Marital Status and Education Level | N |
| SD | Sig. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Euthanasia General Attitud | Male | 223 | 3.8447 | .74959 | 0.127 |
| Female | 201 | 3.7339 | .74064 | ||
| Married | 266 | 3.7683 | .78680 | 0.395 | |
| Single | 158 | 3.8322 | .67387 | ||
| Bachelor’s Degree | 186 | 3.6810 | .76963 | 0.007 | |
| Ph.D./Medical Specialisation | 238 | 3.8790 | .71768 | ||
| Perception of Euthanasia | Male | 223 | 3.8569 | .94159 | 0.110 |
| Female | 201 | 3.7110 | .93036 | ||
| Married | 266 | 3.7589 | 1.00575 | 0.413 | |
| Single | 158 | 3.8361 | .81208 | ||
| Bachelor’s Degree | 186 | 3.6619 | .92756 | 0.014 | |
| Ph.D./Medical Specialisation | 238 | 3.8860 | .93631 | ||
| Euthanasia Prediction | Male | 223 | 3.7463 | .75941 | 0.223 |
| Female | 201 | 3.6550 | .78046 | ||
| Married | 266 | 3.6814 | .80557 | 0.453 | |
| Single | 158 | 3.7395 | .70678 | ||
| Bachelor’s Degree | 186 | 3.5794 | .83677 | 0.004 | |
| Ph.D./Medical Specialisation | 238 | 3.7997 | .70001 | ||
| Social Values | Male | 223 | 4.1196 | .67313 | 0.688 |
| Female | 201 | 4.0962 | .50181 | ||
| Married | 266 | 4.0990 | .58833 | 0.672 | |
| Single | 158 | 4.1245 | .61416 | ||
| Bachelor’s Degree | 186 | 4.1022 | .63033 | 0.847 | |
| Ph.D./Medical Specialisation | 238 | 4.1134 | .57182 | ||