Figure 1:
The bibliometric analysis procedure
Source: Adapted from Donthu et al. (2021)
Figure 2:
Publication number per year of bibliometric analysis
Figure 3:
Publication number of contribution authors‘ bibliometric analysis
Figure 4:
Number of active years of publication bibliometric analysis
Figure 5:
Number of publications by source bibliometric analysis
Figure 6:
otal citations of bibliometric analysis
Figure 7:
Co-citation analysis of bibliometric analysis
Table 1:
Average citations of bibliometric analysis
| Year | N | MeanTCperArt | MeanTCperYear | CitableYears |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 1,00 | 85 | 2,18 | 39 |
| 1991 | 1,00 | 3 | 0,09 | 33 |
| 1992 | 1,00 | 128 | 4,00 | 32 |
| 1993 | 2,00 | 13 | 0,42 | 31 |
| 1994 | 1,00 | 5 | 0,17 | 30 |
| 1995 | 2,00 | 7 | 0,24 | 29 |
| 1996 | 2,00 | 1 | 0,04 | 28 |
| 1997 | 2,00 | 15 | 0,56 | 27 |
| 1998 | 4,00 | 10,5 | 0,40 | 26 |
| 1999 | 4,00 | 14,75 | 0,59 | 25 |
| 2000 | 5,00 | 20,6 | 0,86 | 24 |
| 2001 | 9,00 | 48 | 2,09 | 23 |
| 2002 | 4,00 | 4,5 | 0,20 | 22 |
| 2003 | 6,00 | 26,83 | 1,28 | 21 |
| 2005 | 3,00 | 28 | 1,47 | 19 |
| 2006 | 4,00 | 24,25 | 1,35 | 18 |
| 2007 | 9,00 | 30,11 | 1,77 | 17 |
| 2008 | 10,00 | 20,2 | 1,26 | 16 |
| 2009 | 8,00 | 28,12 | 1,87 | 15 |
| 2010 | 18,00 | 56,61 | 4,04 | 14 |
| Total | 96,00 |
Figure 8:
Bibliography coupling by citing publications of bibliometric analysis
Figure 9:
Relationship among topics of bibliometric analysis
Figure 10:
Thematic evaluation of bibliometric analysis