Figure 1:

Employment in the Tourism Sector
| Porto | Guimarães | Gerês | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| Total respondents | 365 | 264 | 128 | |||
| Family member employed in tourism | 124 | 34.0 | 79 | 29.9 | 53 | 41.4 |
| Accommodation | 30 | 24.2 | 16 | 20.3 | 18 | 34.0 |
| Restaurants | 57 | 46.0 | 33 | 41.8 | 28 | 52.8 |
| Transportation | 14 | 11.3 | 4 | 5.1 | 10 | 18.9 |
| Agencies and Tour Operators | 18 | 14.5 | 11 | 13.9 | 2 | 3.8 |
| Events, Entertainment, and Culture | 12 | 9.7 | 11 | 13.9 | 12 | 22.6 |
| X2= 5.085 df = 2 p = 0.79 | ||||||
Residents’ perceptions of positive impacts
| N | M | Md | MR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Improved the image of the place | ||||
| Porto | 365 | 4.11 | 4 | 339.74 |
| Guimarães | 264 | 4.58 | 5 | 482.51 |
| PN Peneda-Gerês | 128 | 3.73 | 4 | 277.46 |
| Total | 757 | |||
| Kruskal-Wallis’ test results | X2 = 136.180 df = 2 p = 0.001 | |||
| Infrastructure improvement | ||||
| Porto | 365 | 4.08 | 4 | 380.08 |
| Guimarães | 264 | 4.28 | 4 | 444.79 |
| PN Peneda-Gerês | 128 | 3.37 | 4 | 240.22 |
| Total | 757 | |||
| Kruskal-Wallis’ test results | X2= 65.561 df = 2 p = 0.001 | |||
| Opportunities for local businesses | ||||
| Porto | 365 | 4.12 | 4 | 380.05 |
| Guimarães | 264 | 4.29 | 4 | 448.28 |
| PN Peneda-Gerês | 128 | 3.30 | 4 | 233.12 |
| Total | 757 | |||
| Kruskal-Wallis’ test results | X2= 77.778 df = 2 p = 0.001 | |||
| Increased jobs for residents | ||||
| Porto | 365 | 4.16 | 4 | 435.29 |
| Guimarães | 264 | 3.93 | 4 | 387.12 |
| PN Peneda-Gerês | 128 | 2.91 | 3 | 201.73 |
| Total | 757 | |||
| Kruskal-Wallis’ test results | X2= 46.747 df = 2 p = 0.001 | |||
| Enabled heritage preservation | ||||
| Porto | 365 | 3.53 | 4 | 360.35 |
| Guimarães | 264 | 3.95 | 4 | 452.93 |
| PN Peneda-Gerês | 120 | 3.17 | 3 | 279.72 |
| Total | 757 | |||
| Kruskal-Wallis’ test results | X2= 88.299 df = 2 p = 0.001 | |||
Sample Size and Distribution
| Porto | Guimarães | PNPG | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| Total Respondents | 365 | 48.22 | 264 | 34.87 | 128 | 16.91 | 757 | 100.00 |
Residents’ Profile
| Porto | Guimarães | PNPG | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| Total Respondents | 365 | 48.22 | 264 | 34.87 | 128 | 16.91 | 757 | 100.00 | |
| Length of residence in the area | |||||||||
| ≤10 years | 60 | 16.4 | 49 | 18.6 | 16 | 12.5 | 125 | 16.51 | |
| 11–25 years | 117 | 32.1 | 108 | 40.9 | 33 | 25.8 | 258 | 34.08 | |
| 26–49 years | 101 | 27.7 | 61 | 23.1 | 44 | 34.4 | 206 | 27.21 | |
| ≥50 years | 87 | 23.8 | 46 | 17.4 | 35 | 27.3 | 168 | 22.19 | |
| Age | |||||||||
| 18–30 years | 97 | 26.6 | 100 | 37.9 | 18 | 14.1 | 215 | 28.40 | |
| 31–50 years | 128 | 35.1 | 72 | 27.3 | 54 | 42.2 | 254 | 33.55 | |
| 51–65 years | 63 | 17.3 | 64 | 24.2 | 26 | 20.3 | 153 | 20.21 | |
| >65 years | 77 | 21.1 | 28 | 10.6 | 30 | 23.4 | 135 | 17.83 | |
| Gender | |||||||||
| Female | 191 | 52.3 | 149 | 56.4 | 71 | 55.5 | 411 | 54.29 | |
| Male | 174 | 47.7 | 114 | 43.2 | 57 | 44.5 | 345 | 45.57 | |
| Civil status | |||||||||
| Single | 104 | 28.5 | 105 | 39.8 | 40 | 31.3 | 249 | 32.89 | |
| Married/non-marital cohabitation | 185 | 50.7 | 121 | 45.8 | 65 | 50.8 | 371 | 49.01 | |
| Divorced/separated | 36 | 9.9 | 23 | 8.7 | 11 | 8.6 | 70 | 9.25 | |
| Widowed | 40 | 11.0 | 15 | 5.7 | 12 | 9.4 | 67 | 8.85 | |
| Academic qualifications | |||||||||
| Cannot read or write | 1 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.38 | 6 | 4.7 | 8 | 1.06 | |
| I can read but no school | 2 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.76 | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 0.53 | |
| 1st cycle (primary education) | 75 | 20.0 | 44 | 16.67 | 37 | 28.9 | 156 | 20.61 | |
| Intermediate (9th grade) | 112 | 29.9 | 28 | 10.61 | 26 | 20.3 | 166 | 21.93 | |
| Secondary/vocational (12th grade) | 93 | 24.8 | 78 | 29.55 | 43 | 33.6 | 214 | 28.27 | |
| High education | 92 | 24.5 | 111 | 42.05 | 16 | 12.5 | 219 | 28.93 | |
| Labour status | |||||||||
| Domestic | 7 | 1.9 | 4 | 1.5 | 7 | 5.5 | 18 | 2.38 | |
| Student | 38 | 10.4 | 56 | 21.2 | 6 | 4.7 | 100 | 13.21 | |
| Self-employed | 54 | 14.8 | 26 | 9.8 | 44 | 34.4 | 124 | 16.38 | |
| Retired | 68 | 18.6 | 41 | 15.5 | 25 | 19.5 | 134 | 17.70 | |
| Unemployed | 21 | 5.8 | 5 | 1.9 | 12 | 9.4 | 38 | 5.02 | |
| Seeking 1st job | 9 | 2.5 | 13 | 4.9 | 0 | 0.0 | 22 | 2.91 | |
| Employee of someone else | 174 | 47.7 | 119 | 45.1 | 34 | 26.6 | 327 | 43.20 | |
Tourism Social Sustainability Indicators
| Overnights 2022* | Residents (2021 Census) | Tourist Intensity (overnights/100 residents/day), in 2022* | Tourist Density (overnights/Km2/day), in 2021* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norte | 11 556 645 | 3 586 586 | 0.08 | 0.79 |
| Arcos de Valdevez | 80 263 | 20 718 | 0.09 | 0.39 |
| Guimarães | 320 866 | 156 830 | 0.05 | 2.26 |
| Porto | 4 819 168 | 231 800 | 0.54 | 193.97 |
Residents’ Perceptions of Negative Impacts
| N | M | Md | MR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increased prices of goods and services | ||||
| Porto | 365 | 4.05 | 4 | 370.61 |
| Guimarães | 264 | 4.44 | 5 | 483.54 |
| PN Peneda-Gerês | 128 | 3.04 | 3 | 187.30 |
| Total | 757 | |||
| Kruskal-Wallis’ test results | X2=173.927 df=2 p=0.001 | |||
| Environmental degradation | ||||
| Porto | 365 | 2.83 | 3 | 413.81 |
| Guimarães | 264 | 2.29 | 2 | 305.54 |
| PN Peneda-Gerês | 128 | 2.93 | 3 | 431.25 |
| Total | 757 | |||
| Kruskal-Wallis’ test results | X2=29.440 df=2 p=0.001 | |||
| Reduction of traditional shopping | ||||
| Porto | 365 | 1.92 | 2 | 377.14 |
| Guimarães | 264 | 1.97 | 2 | 354.28 |
| PN Peneda-Gerês | 128 | 2.30 | 2 | 435.30 |
| Total | 757 | |||
| Kruskal-Wallis’ test results | X2=16.469 df=2 p=0.001 | |||
| Causes loss of cultural identity | ||||
| Porto | 365 | 2.30 | 2 | 410.80 |
| Guimarães | 264 | 1.87 | 2 | 316.26 |
| PN Peneda-Gerês | 127 | 2.34 | 2 | 415.04 |
| Total | 756 | |||
| Kruskal-Wallis’ test results | X2=12.795 df=2 p=0.001 | |||
| Disrupts daily life of residents | ||||
| Porto | 365 | 2.97 | 3 | 455.52 |
| Guimarães | 264 | 2.08 | 2 | 293.09 |
| PN Peneda-Gerês | 128 | 2.30 | 2 | 337.97 |
| Total | 757 | |||
| Kruskal-Wallis’ test results | X2= 53.044 df = 2 p = 0.001 | |||