Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A case study for a transformational festival creation in Lourinhã, Portugal Cover

A case study for a transformational festival creation in Lourinhã, Portugal

Open Access
|Dec 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1:

Festival studies - researched works by theme (own elaboration)

Table 2:

Transformational festivals theoretical support – main works by theme (own elaboration)

ThemeAuthors
The core phenomenonConceptTEDxTalks (2011); Mohr (2017); Ruane (2017); Taylor (2015).
TransformationBannerman (2016); Bottorff (2015); Mohr (2017); St. John & Baldini (2012).
Transformational experiencesBannerman (2016); Bottorff (2015); Mohr (2017); Reic (2017); Taylor (2015).
Political and social/cultural meanings and discourses; social changeBannerman (2016); Connell (n.d.); Howard (2014); Mohr (2017); Taylor (2015); Yeganegy (2012).
Authenticity (identity, commercialisation, commodification)Flinn & Frew (2013); Gauthier (2013); Ruane (2017); St. John (2015); Yeganegy (2012).
Community, culture, place identity and attachmentBannerman (2016); Mohr (2017); St. John (2015); Taylor (2015).
Communitas, social cohesion, sociabilityBannerman (2016); Hastings (2015); Mohr (2017); St. John (2015).
Festivity, liminality, the carnivalesqueBiaett (2015); Flinn & Frew (2013); Gauthier (2013); St. John (2015); St. John & Baldini (2012); St. John (2011); Yeganegy (2012).
Rites and rituals; religionBannerman (2016); Bottorff (2015); Gauthier (2013); Hastings (2015); Mohr (2017); Ruane (2017); St. John & Baldini (2012); Yeganegy (2012).
PilgrimageMohr (2017); St. John & Baldini (2012); Bottorff (2015); Yeganegy (2012).
Myths and symbolsBottorff (2015); Flinn & Frew (2013); Taylor (2015).
SpectacleBannerman (2016); Mohr (2017); Schmidt (2015); St. John & Baldini (2012); Yeganegy (2012).
MotivationsBennett, Taylor & Woodward (2016); Bottorff (2015); Gauthier (2013); Hastings (2015); Mohr (2017); St. John (2015); St. John & Baldini (2012); Yeganegy (2012).
Figure 1:

Research scheme (own elaboration)

Figure 2:

H1 – Participation abroad by TF participation (own elaboration)

Figure 3:

H1 – TF participation by external participation (own elaboration)

Figure 4:

H2 – Brand rejection by TF participation (own elaboration)

Figure 5:

H2 – Brand rejection by TF participation (own elaboration)

Figure 6:

H3 – Venue preference by TF participation (own elaboration)

Figure 7:

H3 – Venue preference by TF participation (own elaboration)

Figure 8:

H4 – Electronic music preference by TF participation (own elaboration)

Figure 9:

Participation in TF by stereotype identification (own elaboration)

Figure 10:

H6 – Transformational festivals CSF (own elaboration)

Table 3:

Spiritualists’ critical success factors (own elaboration)

CSFS - NSChi-square
(X2 (1))
pMdn
(S - NS)
Mann-Whitney
(U)
p
Alternatives to new experiences/alternative activities4.3%–0.0%11.3490.001162.14–155.55962.50.001
Outdoor space – welcoming4.3%–0.4%6.3040.012161.64–155.5959860.012
Food conditions
Party
Personal taste
Organisation image
Informality
Message that transmits2.1%–0.0%5.6560.017159.32–15660950.018
Where one feels at home
Temporal period
Performers
Being outside the box
Show type
Costs4.3%–0.8%3.8650.049161.14–155.686009.50.05

1 Note: S – Spiritualist; NS – Non-spiritualist

Table 4:

Hippies’ critical success factors (own elaboration)

CSFH – NHChi-square
(X2 (1))
pMdn
(H – NH)
Mann-Whitney
(U)
p
Food conditions
Festival philosophy
Festival ideology
Rural location7.1%–0.0%21.3540.000167.14–156.0519370.000
Option of preference at the moment
Local sustainability
Accessibility
Musicians
7.1%–0.3%9.7290.002166.64–156.0219440.002
Toilet conditions7.1%–0.7%5.8810.015166.14–156.0519510.015
Music/musical offer35.7%–14.8%4.4330.035187.71–155.0316490.036
Conditions7.1%–1.0%3.9780.046165.64–156.0719580.046

1 Note: H – Hippie; NH – Non-hippie

Table 5:

Artistics’ critical success factors (own elaboration)

CSFA - NAChi-square
(X2 (1))
pMdn
(A - NA)
Mann-Whitney
(U)
p
Alternatives to new experiences/alternative activities
Overnight stay/accommodation conditions3.4%–0.0%8.8150.003160.88–155.571120.003
Event quality
Value
Spirit
Festival philosophy
Festival ideology
Environmental logistics
Message that transmits1.7%–0.0%4.3930.036158.69–15672390.036
Cultural offer
Temporal period
Beach
Noise

1 Note: A – Artistic; NA – Non-artistic

Table 6:

Ravers’ critical success factors (own elaboration)

CSFR - NRChi-square (X2 (1))pMdn (R - NR)Mann-Whitney (U)p
The option of preference at the moment7.1%–0.0%21.3540.000167.14–15619370.000
Organisation7.1%–0.7%5.8810.015166.14–156.0519510.015

1 Note: R – Ravers; NR – Non-ravers

Table 7:

Generation X’s critical success factors (own elaboration)

CSFX - NXChi-square
(X2 (1))
pMdn
(X - NX)
Mann-Whitney
(U)
p
Venue commodities
Fewer people than big festivals
Offer5.9%–0.0%17.4090.000165.18–15623600.000
Possibility to see all the artists and not simultaneously
Show type
Availability
Landscape5.9%–0.3%7.7550.005164.68–156.032368.50.005
Musicians
Organisation5.9%–0.7%4.5720.033164.18–156.0623770.033

1 Note: X – Generation X; NX – Non-Generation X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ejthr-2022-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2182-4924 | Journal ISSN: 2182-4916
Language: English
Page range: 46 - 60
Submitted on: Nov 15, 2020
Accepted on: Dec 12, 2021
Published on: Dec 31, 2022
Published by: Polytechnic Institute of Leiria
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 João Malho Ferreira Ribeiro de Carvalho, Nuno Gustavo, Victor Afonso, published by Polytechnic Institute of Leiria
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.