Have a personal or library account? Click to login
International Innovation Alliances: A Case Study of the Influence of Proximity in the Aviation Sector Cover

International Innovation Alliances: A Case Study of the Influence of Proximity in the Aviation Sector

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and Innovation: From Statics to Dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.883598
  2. Balland, P. A., De Vaan, M., & Boschma, R. (2013). The dynamics of interfirm networks along the industry life cycle: The case of the global video game industry, 1987–2007. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(5), 741–765. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs023
  3. Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de Conteúdo (3rd ed.). Lisboa: Edições.
  4. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. l. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.
  5. Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
  6. Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2010). The spatial evolution of innovation networks: a proximity perspective. In E. E. P. Limited (Ed.), The Handbook of Economic Geography (1 ed., pp. 120–135.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  7. Broekel, T. (2015). The Co-evolution of Proximities – A Network Level Study. Regional Studies, 49(6), 921–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.1001732
  8. Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2012). Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbr010
  9. Brossard, O., & Gres, L. (2007). Cognitive & Relational Distance in Alliance Networks: Evidence on the Knowledge Value Chain in the European ICT Sector. Knowledge Creation Diffusion Utilization, 2007 (18), 1–28.
  10. Capaldo, A., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2014). Partner geographic and organizational proximity and the innovative performance of knowledge-creating alliances. European Management Review, 11(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12024
  11. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Harvard). Boston: Harvard.
  12. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities : What Are They ? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.
  13. Fitjar, R. D., Huber, F., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2016). Not too close, not too far: testing the Goldilocks principle of ‘optimal’ distance in innovation networks. Industry and Innovation, 23(6), 465–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1184562
  14. Geerts, A., Leten, B., Belderbos, R., & Van Looy, B. (2018). Does Spatial Ambidexterity Pay Off? On the Benefits of Geographic Proximity Between Technology Exploitation and Exploration. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12380
  15. Guido, N., & Franco, B. (2003) Evaluation of supplier contribution to product development: fuzzy and neuro-fuzzy based approaches. International Journal of Production Research, 41(13), 2933–2956.
  16. Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002). External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies, 39(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00287
  17. Hansen, T. (2014). Juggling with Proximity and Distance: Collaborative Innovation Projects in the Danish Cleantech Industry. Economic Geography, 90(4), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12057
  18. Hansen, T. (2015). Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects. Regional Studies, 49(10), 1672–1684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.873120
  19. He, Z. -L., & Wong, P. -K. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
  20. Huber, F. (2011). On the Role and Interrelationship of Spatial, Social and Cognitive Proximity: Personal Knowledge Relationships of R&D Workers in the Cambridge Information Technology Cluster. Regional Studies, 46(9), 1169–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.569539
  21. Jansen, J. J. P., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008
  22. Kauppila, O. P. (2010). Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing structurally separate interorganizational partnerships. Strategic Organization, 8(4), 283–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127010387409
  23. Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. G. (2006). Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00121.x
  24. Liu, L., Wang, F., & Li, X. (2019). Comparing the configured causal antecedents of exploration and exploitation: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 13(1), 1–25.
  25. Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
  26. March, J. G. (1991). Exploracion Y Explotacion En Aprendizaje Organizacional. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  27. Martínez-noya, A., & Narula, R. (2018). What more can we learn from R&D alliances? A review and research agenda. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de La Empresa, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.04.001
  28. Mattes, J. (2012). Dimensions of Proximity and Knowledge Bases: Innovation between Spatial and Non-spatial Factors. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1085–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.552493
  29. Narula, R. (2002). R&D collaboration by SMEs: some analytical issues and evidence. Cooperative Strategies and Alliance, (October), 543–568.
  30. Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. Oerlemans, L., & Meeus, M. (2005). Do Organizational and Spatial Proximity Impact on Firm Performance? Regional Studies, 39(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320896
  32. Oliver, G., Marco, Z., Timo, W., & Martin, S. (2010) Crossing the Industry-line: Breakthrough Innovation through Cross-Industry Alliances with ‘non-suppliers’. Long Range Plann, 43, 639–654.
  33. Parng, B. C.; & Chen, M.K. (2014) Innovation and Alliance Effects for Tourism Industry in Taiwan. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 6(3), 199–209.
  34. Santos, J. (2006). O desafio Metanacional. In Gestão Internacional. São Paulo: Saraiva.
  35. Schamp, E. W., Rentmeister, B., & Lo, V. (2004). Dimensions of proximity in knowledge-based networks: The cases of investment banking and automobile design. European Planning Studies, 12(5), 607–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431042000219978
  36. Steinmo, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2016). How firms collaborate with public research organizations : The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1250–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.006
  37. Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  38. Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320842
  39. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565056
  40. Zhang, H., & Lu, R. (2010) Research on the Process and Impact of Supplier Participation in Service Innovation. Studies in Science of Science, 09, 1422–1427.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ejthr-2021-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2182-4924 | Journal ISSN: 2182-4916
Language: English
Page range: 34 - 44
Submitted on: Oct 10, 2020
Accepted on: Apr 30, 2021
Published on: Dec 30, 2021
Published by: Polytechnic Institute of Leiria
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Jessâmine Salvini, Simone Galina, Teresa Costa, published by Polytechnic Institute of Leiria
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.