References
- Albanian Parliament. (2017). ‘‘Law No. 97/2017 on Assisted Reproductive Technologies’’.
- Besson, S. (2020). International surrogacy arrangements and the rights of the child. ‘International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 34’’ (1), 1–25.
- Constitution of the Republic of Albania. (1998, as amended).
- Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989). United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child
- Council of Europe. (1950). ‘‘European Convention on Human Rights’’. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf
- Council of Europe. (1997). ‘‘Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Oviedo Convention) ’’. https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/164
- Dickson v. United Kingdom, No. 44362/04, European Court of Human Rights, 2007. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83788
- Dine, A. (2023). Ethical standards and legal challenges in Albanian assisted reproduction.‘‘Journal of Medical Ethics and Law, 11’’ (2), 45–63.
- European Court of Human Rights. (2014). ‘‘Mennesson v. France’’, no. 65192/11. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145179
- European Court of Human Rights. (2016). ‘‘Foulon and Bouvet v. France’’, Nos. 9063/14 and 10410/14. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164968
- European Court of Human Rights. (2017). ‘‘Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy’’, no. 25358/12. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170093
- European Court of Human Rights. (2014). ‘‘Labassee v. France’’, no. 65941/11. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=002-9780
- European Court of Human Rights. (2015). ‘‘X and Others v. Belgium’’, no. 24159/08. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-75036
- European Court of Human Rights. (2010). ‘‘Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland’’, no. 41615/07. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99817
- Federal Republic of Germany. (1949). ‘‘Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany (Grundgesetz, GG) ’’. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/
- Federal Republic of Germany. (1990). ‘‘Embryo Act (Embryonenschutzgesetz – EschG) ’’. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/eschg/
- Federal Republic of Germany. (2001). ‘‘Adoption Placement Act (Adoptionsvermittlungsgesetz – AdVermiG)’’. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/eschg/French Republic. (1994). ‘‘Code Civil’’, Article 16-7 as amended, introduced by Law No. 94-653 of July 29, 1994. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006070721/
- Gjoni, M. (2024). Surrogacy in Albania: Ethical controversies and political gridlock. ‘‘Albanian Journal of Bioethics and Law, 5’’ (1), 23–36.
- Gross, A. (2018). The politics of surrogacy in France: Between public order and child welfare. ‘‘Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 6’’, 1–8.
- Gross, O. (2020). Surrogacy in France: Between legal prohibition and judicial recognition. ‘‘European Journal of Comparative Law, 27’’ (3), 104–120.
- Horsey, K. (2015). Surrogacy in the UK: Myth busting and reform. University of Kent. https://blogs.kent.ac.uk/surrogacylawblog/files/2016/01/Horsey-Report.pdf
- Horsey, K. (2016). ‘‘Surrogacy: Law, policy and practice’’. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
- Hudson, N. F. (2020). Regulating surrogacy: Comparative perspectives and emerging trends. ‘‘Journal of Reproductive Ethics, 15’’ (3).
- Hellenic Republic. (2005). ‘‘Law No. 3305/2005 on the Application of the Methods of Medically Assisted Reproduction’’.
- Hellenic Republic. (1946). ‘‘Greek Civil Code (Astikos Kodikas)’’, as amended. https://www.enomothesia.gr
- Italian Parliament. (2004). ‘‘Law No. 40/2004 on Medically Assisted Procreation’’. https://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:legge:2004-02-19;40
- Johnson, J. (2021). Surrogacy and the law: A comparative overview of European approaches. ‘‘Journal of Family Law Studies, 35’’ (2).
- Kokkini-Iatridou, D., & Sandland, R. (2017). Surrogacy in Greece: Legal developments and challenges. ‘‘European Journal of Health Law, 24’’ (3), 237–255.
- Krasniqi, V. (2023). The unregulated terrain of surrogacy in Albania: Legal gaps and human rights challenges. ‘‘Albanian Legal Review, 12’’ (2), 75–94.
- Lamçe, J. (2023). Surrogacy contracts in Albania: Legal challenges and prospects. ‘‘Albanian Law Review, 8’’ (1), 78–92.
- Law No. 7850/1994, Civil Code of the Republic of Albania, (1994, July 29). Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland, No. 41615/07, European Court of Human Rights, 2010. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99817
- Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy, no. 25358/12. (2017). ECHR.
- Pennings, G. (2012). Ethical issues in surrogacy arrangements. ‘‘Human Reproduction, 27’’ (7), 1889–1895.
- Stoll, P. T. (2014). Surrogacy and German law: Ethical and constitutional constraints. ‘‘German Law Journal, 15’’ (6), 1121–1145.
- Trimmings, K., & Beaumont, P. (2013). ‘‘International surrogacy arrangements: Legal regulation at the international level’’. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- UNESCO. (2005). ‘‘Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights’’. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000146180
- United Kingdom. (1985). ‘‘Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985’’, Chapter 49. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/49
- United Kingdom. (2008). ‘‘Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008’’, Section 54. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22/section/54
- Xhabija, F. (2022). Parentage and reproductive technologies in Albanian law: A critical review. ‘‘Journal of Family Law, 7’’ (2).
- Zyberaj, J. (2019). Surrogacy in Albania and its legal implications on determining parenthood. ‘‘Proceedings of the 2nd International Academic Conference on Humanities and Social Science’’. https://www.doi.org/10.33422/2iachss.2019.02.43