Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Tradition and Modernity in the Romanian Rural Space. Case Study: the Arges Sub-Carpathian Foothills Cover

Tradition and Modernity in the Romanian Rural Space. Case Study: the Arges Sub-Carpathian Foothills

Open Access
|Feb 2014

References

  1. Alessandrescu, C., 1893. Dicţionarul geografic al judeţului Muscel. Bucharest: Socec.
  2. Bacanaru I., Candea M., 1977. ‘Aspecte geografice in alimentarea cu apa a localitatilor rurale si urbane din Romania’, SCGGG-Geogr.. Vol. XXIV, 2.
  3. Barbic A., 1988. ‘Cultural identity of the Slovenian countryside: Territorial integrity and Cultural diversity from the perspective of rural communities’, Agriculture and Human Values. Journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. Vol.15 nr. 3/1998: 253-265.10.1023/A:1007452715008
  4. Cocean, P., 2002. Geografie regional. Cluj Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană.
  5. Conea, I.,1931. ‘Aşezările omeneşti in depresiunea subcarpatică din Oltenia’, BSRRG, Vol. L.
  6. Courville, S ., 1993. ‘Tradition et modernite: leurs significations spatiales’ (Tradition and modernity: their spatial significance’), Recherches sociographiques, Vol. 34, no.2,: 211-231 (2 p.).10.7202/056768ar
  7. Cucu, V., 2009. Satul Romanesc. Tradiţie, contemporaneitate si speranţe de viitor. Bucuresti: Editura Transversal.
  8. Dejeant-Pons, M., 2007. Ghid de valorificare a patrimoniului rural. Casa de Presa si Editura TRIBUNA.
  9. Giddens, A.,1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press
  10. Ianoş, I., 1996. ‘The changing Romanian village. The case of Semlac in Arad county, Romania’, Geojournal. Vol. 38 (2).10.1007/BF00186666
  11. Majerova, V., 2009. ‘Local Initiatives Functioning as a C ondition of Rural Development of the Czech Countryside’, Eastern European Countryside. Vol. 15.: 127-149.10.2478/v10130-009-0008-2
  12. Manu, C. M., 2003. ‘Focul lui Sumedru’, Satul natal. Vol. III (9).
  13. Florea, M. S ., 1994. Les fetes chez les Roumains. Etude ethnographique. Bucaresti: Ed. F undaţiei Culturale Romane.
  14. Mlinar, Z., Uvod, M., Zdravko, Ur.,1995. Osamosvajanje in povezovanje vevropskem prostoru (Emancipation and Unification in the European Space). Ljubljana: Fakulteta za drubene vede, Znanstvena knjinica, pp.1-22.
  15. Tudor, P., 1997. Sărbătorile la romani. Studiu etnografic (Les fetes chez les Roumains. Etude ethnographique). Ediţie de: Datcu, Iordan. Bucureşti, Ed. S aeculum I. O ., pp.43.
  16. Panea, N., 1995. Antropologie a tradiţiilor: tradiţia populară şi mecanismele de reglare a mentalităţii (Anthropologie des traditions: la tradition populaire et les mecanismes de reglage des mentalites). Craiova, Ed. O mniscop, pp.137.
  17. Sandru, I., 1967. Problemele modernizarii satului romanesc, in Rev. „Terra”, nr.2
  18. Strassoldo, R., 1990. ‘Lokalna pripadnost in globalna Uvrstitev. Druboslovne razprave’ (‘Local belonging and global placing’). Ljubljana: Slovensko sociološko društvo in Inštitut za sociologijo, pp: 64-76.
  19. Urucu, V., 1985. ‘Centres ruraux de polarisation locale en Oltenie’, RRGGG, Geographie, pp.29.
  20. Urucu, V., Dobre, S., 1998. ‘Particularitati ale dezvoltarii durabile a satului din Campia Romana si din Dobrogea’, Comunicari de Geografie. Vol.II.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eec-2013-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8717 | Journal ISSN: 1232-8855
Language: English
Page range: 127 - 151
Published on: Feb 27, 2014
Published by: Nicolaus Copernicus University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2014 Gabriela Manea, Elena Matei, Iuliana Vijulie, Marian Marin, Octavian Cocos, Adrian Tiscovschi, published by Nicolaus Copernicus University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.