Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Integrating Environmental, Social, Governance into Low-Carbon Environmental Management: An Exploratory Study Cover

Integrating Environmental, Social, Governance into Low-Carbon Environmental Management: An Exploratory Study

By: Wenlong Lai and  Bui Thanh Khoa  
Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. Cao GM, Zhao X, Gao HH, Tang MC. A game theory analysis of intelligent transformation and sales mode choice of the logistics service provider. Adv Production Eng Manage. 2023;18(3):327-44. DOI: 10.14743/apem2023.3.476.
  2. Bányai A. Impact of agile, condition-based maintenance strategy on cost efficiency of production systems. Adv Production Eng Manage. 2023;18(3):475. DOI: 10.14743/apem2023.3.475.
  3. Rinkevičius T, Miečinskienė A. Assessment of the involvement of the European Union countries in sustainable finance. J Service, Innovation Sust Development. 2023;4(1):115-28. DOI: 10.33168/SISD.2023.0110.
  4. Zanellato G, Marin-Pantelescu A, Dragolea LL. European sustainable development goals reporting: a qualitative comparative analysis on cultural impact. Economic Comput Economic Cybernetics Stud Res. 2024;58(3):258-75. DOI: 10.24818/18423264/58.3.24.16.
  5. Guzman E, Poler R, Andres B. A matheuristic approach combining genetic algorithm and mixed integer linear programming model for production and distribution planning in the supply chain. Adv Prod Eng Manage. 2023;18(1):19-31. DOI: 10.14743/apem2023.1.454.
  6. Ahmed AM, Mohamed AA. Inbound, outbound disturbances and supply chain vulnerability of firms operating in post-conflict zones: the case of Somalia. J System Manage Sci. 2023;13(3):352-63. DOI: 10.33168/JSMS.2023.0324.
  7. Pena CR, Serrano ALM, Ferreira LOG, Guarnieri P, Peixoto MGM, Neumann C, et al. An applied study of data envelopment analysis on Brazilian agriculture data. J System Manage Sci. 2023;13(3):517-32. DOI: 10.33168/JSMS.2023.0335.
  8. Triandini E, Wijaya IGNS, Suniantara IKP. Analysis of technology adoption by SMES using technology organization environment model. J System Manage Sci. 2023;13(2):225-40. DOI: 10.33168/JSMS.2023.0216.
  9. Suchanek P, Bucki R, Postrozny J. Modelling and simulation of a decision-making process supporting business system logistics. Int J Simulation Modelling. 2023;22(4):655-66. DOI: 10.2507/IJSIMM22-4-665.
  10. Sket K, Ficko M, Gubeljak N, Brezocnik M. Study of environmental impacts on overhead transmission lines using genetic algorithms. Int J Simulation Modelling. 2023;22(4):610-8. DOI: 10.2507/IJSIMM22-4-661.
  11. Lumnitzer E, Fabianova J, Janekova J, Suhanyiova A, Suhanyi L. The use of simulations in investment decision-making and financing. Int J Simulation Modelling. 2024;23(1):113-24. DOI: 10.2507/IJSIMM23-1-677.
  12. Liu C, Xie W, Shi Y, Huo H. Optimizing eco-efficiency and carbon emissions in the electric power industry for sustainable development. Environ Eng Manage J. 2024;23(9):1849-70. DOI: 10.30638/eemi.2024.149.
  13. Chen W, Huang M, Du C. Can development in the digital economy lead to a win-win for ‘efficiency promotion’ and ‘Emission Reduction’? Ecol Chem Eng S. 2024;31(3):385-95. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2024-0026.
  14. Gillan SL, Koch A, Starks LT. Firms and social responsibility: a review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. J Corp Financ. 2021;66(3):101889. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889.
  15. Kwilinski A, Lyulyov O, Pimonenko T. The role of green finance in attaining environmental sustainability within a countrys ESG performance. J Innov Knowl. 2025;10(2):100674. DOI: 10.1016/J.JIK.2025.100674.
  16. Dohrmann M, Martinez-Blasco M, Cuadros J, Sanz FP. Environmental performance and firm value: the moderating role of ESG-executive compensation. Sustain Dev. 2025;33(4):6215-27. DOI: 10.1002/sd.3454.
  17. Kotrba V, Menšík J, Martinez FL. ESG consequences for companies in the digital environment: insights from sector-specific performance across the EU-27. J Market Anal. 2025;13:574-86. DOI: 10.1057/s41270-024-00370-7.
  18. Farooq U, Thavorn J. Exploring the impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on firm efficiency: the mediating role of environmental R&D investment in BRICS economies. Corp Soc Resp Environ Manage. 2025;32(3):3978. DOI: 10.1002/csr.3165.
  19. Merkevicius J, Nalivaike J, Nalivaika D. Expanding internet of things into the new markets. J Manage Change Digit Era. 2024;1(1):42-58. DOI: 10.33168/JMCDE.2024.0104.
  20. Šević A, Nerantzidis M, Tampakoudis I, Tzeremes P. Sustainability indices nexus: green economy, ESG, environment and clean energy. Int Rev Financ Anal. 2024;96(PA):103615. DOI: 10.1016/J.IRFA.2024.103615.
  21. Ralf M, Andrée MC, Nathalie D, Jon L, Raimonda A, Alfredas C, et al. Governance of ESG implementations: governance dimensions and their structural implementation. Int J Manage Proj Bus. 2025;18(1):118-38. DOI: 10.1108/IJMPB-05-2024-0107.
  22. Jo H, Chun H, Song H. Shared governance and ESG rating: evidence from Korea. Corp Soc Resp Environ Manage. 2025;32(2):2769-82. DOI: 10.1002/CSR.3104.
  23. Bruno CC, Henisz JW. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) outcomes and municipal credit risk. Bus Soc. 2024;63(8):1709-56. DOI: 10.1177/00076503231220541.
  24. Lee H, Kim HJ, Jung SH. From corporate earnings calls to social impact: exploring ESG signals in S&P 500 ESG index companies through transformer-based models. J Cleaner Prod. 2025;501:145320. DOI: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2025.145320.
  25. Hsu BX, Chen YM. Does corporate social responsibility influence performance persistence? a signal extraction approach with evidence from Fortune 500 companies. Technol Forecast Soc. 2024;200:123154. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123154.
  26. Rahmani A, Ahmad S, Jalil IEA, Lee SW. A comprehensive assessment model for requirement-based test case prioritization: integrating internal factors and dependency analysis through expert evaluation. J Logist Inform Serv Sci. 2024;11(10):65-85. DOI: 10.33168/JLISS.2024.1005.
  27. Gabor MR, Dîmbean CA, Kardos M, Bănacu CS. Statistical modelling for synergic well-being and company performance based on psychological constructs as predictors of employee satisfaction. Econ Comput Econ Cyb. 2024;58(1):280-97. DOI: 10.24818/18423264/58.1.24.18.
  28. Zhang HJ, He F, Wan PJ, Zhang Y, Zhu YM. The digital path to green: Exploring the impact of supply chain digital transformation on corporate green investments. J Cleaner Prod. 2025;526:146656. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146656.
  29. Genc TS. A sustainable semiconductor supply chain under regulation. Int J Prod Econ. 2024;278:109426. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109426.
  30. Zhang MY, Tan JL, Cheng ETC. Pricing of Chinese certified emissions reduction scheme in a supply chain under the cap-and-trade policy. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2024;31(1):31-48. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2024-0003.
  31. Xu W, Xu S, Liu DY, Awaga AL, Rabia AC, Zhang YY. Impact of fairness concerns on resource-sharing decisions: a comparative analysis using evolutionary game models in manufacturing enterprises. Adv Production Eng Manage. 2024;19(2):223-38. DOI: 10.14743/apem2024.2.503.
  32. Khadka S, Khadka AK. Exploring freelancer satisfaction: impact of cultural norms, digital tech, and government support in Nepal. J Manage Change Digit Era. 2024;1(1):89-106. DOI: 10.33168/JMCDE.2024.0107.
  33. Ji X, Xu W, Aslam R, Yin Y. The influence of government on automobile enterprise`s production methods: an evolutionary game based study. Econ Comput Econ Cyb. 2024;58(4):223-40. DOI: 10.24818/18423264/58.4.24.14.
  34. Lee CC, Luppi JL, Simmons T, Tran B, Zhang R. Examining the impacts of ESG on employee retention: a study of generational differences. J Bus Manage. 2023;29(1):1-22. DOI: 10.6347/JBM.202307_29(1).0001.
  35. Valiusis O. Digitalization modeling of production processes in paper packaging sector companies. J Manage Change Digit Era. 2025;2(1):67-76. DOI: 10.33168/JMCDE.2025.0105.
  36. Feng SJ. Implementation of decision support system for ecological environment planning of urban green space. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2024;31(2):177-92. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2024-0012.
  37. Liu T. Time-varying influence of policy risk on carbon emissions analysis. J Serv Innov Sustain Dev. 2024;5(2):95-115. DOI: 10.33168/SISD.2024.0206.
  38. Alshemmari JMHJ. An empirical study on employee empowerment role in increasing efficiency of employee performance. J Logist Inform Serv Sci. 2023;10(1):52-71. DOI: 10.33168/JLISS.2023.0104.
  39. Zhang FL. Evolutionary algorithm for dynamic resource allocation and its applications. Int J Simulation Modelling. 2023;23(3):531-42. DOI: 10.2507/IJSIMM23-3-CO14.
  40. Kourriche I, Aboutafail MO. A review of the impact of lean manufacturing on performance through PARETO analysis. J Logist Inform Serv Sci. 2023;10(3):13-27. DOI: 10.33168/JLISS.2023.0302.
  41. Kurnia A, Oktavia T. A multi-criteria decision approach for optimized route planning in retail distribution. J Logist Inform Serv Sci. 2024;11(9):37-53. DOI: 10.33168/JLISS.2024.0903.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eces-2025-0030 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Language: English
Page range: 571 - 587
Published on: Dec 31, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Wenlong Lai, Bui Thanh Khoa, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.