Synergistic Governance of Digital Economy Development and Carbon Reduction: Evidence from Chinese Cities

Ma, Nian; Deng, Ying

doi:10.2478/eces-2024-0014

References

Karlsson M, Alfredsson E, Westling N. Climate policy co-benefits: a review. Climate Policy. 2020;20(3):292-316. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1724070.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ürge-Vorsatz D, Herrero ST, Dubash NK, Lecocq F. Measuring the co-benefits of climate change mitigation. Annual Rev Environ Resources. 2014;39:549-82. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-031312-125456.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mayrhofer JP, Gupta J. The science and politics of co-benefits in climate policy. Environ Sci Policy. 2016;57:22-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xie Z, Wu R Wang S. How technological progress affects the carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from National Panel Quantile Regression. J Cleaner Prod. 2021;307:127133. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127133.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sun W, Huang C. How does urbanization affect carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from China. J Cleaner Prod. 2020;272:122828. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122828.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yu Y, Zhang N. Low-carbon city pilot and carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China. Energy Economics. 2021;96:105125. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105125.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gao P, Yue S, Chen H. Carbon emission efficiency of China’s industry sectors: From the perspective of embodied carbon emissions. J Cleaner Prod. 2021;283:124655. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124655.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhu K, Guo X, Zhang Z. Reevaluation of the carbon emissions embodied in global value chains based on an inter-country input-output model with multinational enterprises. Appl Energy. 2022;307:118220. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118220.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wu CH, Tsai SB, Liu W, Shao XF, Xia YK, Wacławek M. Green environment and sustainable development: methods and applications. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2021;28(4):467-70. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2021-0030.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liu W, Tsai SB, Wu CH, Shao X, Wacławek M. Corporate environmental management and sustainable operation: theory and application. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2022;29(3):283-5. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2022-0020.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Filak M, Hoffman S. Benzo(a)pyrene in PM10 - Air monitoring results in Poland. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2023;30(4):557-65. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2023-0048.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O’Neill BC, Dalton M, Fuchs R, Zigova K. Global demographic trends and future carbon emissions. Proc National Acad Sci. 2010;107(41):17521-6. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1004581107.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steger U. Environmental management systems: empirical evidence and further perspectives. Europ Manage J. 2000;18(1): 23-37. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00066-3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liu W, Tsai SB, Wu CH, Shao XF, Wacławek M. Corporate environmental management with digital transformation: theory and applications. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2023;30(2):155-7. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2023-0014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wu SH, Wang HQ, He M, Qin C. Environmental regulation, environmental policy complexity and technological innovation efficiency. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2023;30(2):159-66. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2023-0015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang C, Li J. The evaluation and promoting path of green innovation performance in Chinese pollution intensive industry. Sustainability. 2020;12(10):4198. DOI: 10.3390/su12104198.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhou PL, Zhang D, Zhou Q, Xia WJ. Modeling economic performance of interprovincial CO₂ emission reduction quota trading in China. Appl Energy. 2013;112(16):1518-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Henneman LRF, Rafaj P, Annegarn HJ, Klausbruckner C. Assessing emissions levels and costs associated with climate and air pollution policies in South Africa. Energy Policy. 2016;89(2):160-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.026.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhao B, Wang TY, Jiang Z, Gu Y, Liou KN, Kalandiyur N, et al. Air quality and health co-benefits of different deep decarbonization pathways in California. Environ Sci Technol. 2019;53(12):7163-71. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02385.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang P, Wu JN. Impact of mandatory targets on PM_2.5 concentration control in Chinese cities. J Cleaner Prod. 2018;197:323-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.189.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang YP, Yan WL, Ma D, Zhang CL. Carbon emissions and optimal scale of China’s manufacturing agglomeration under heterogeneous environmental regulation. J Cleaner Prod. 2018;176:140-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.118.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Du M, Zhang X, Xia L, Cao L, Zhang Z, Zhang L, et al. The China Carbon Watch (CCW) System: A rapid accounting of household carbon emissions in China at the provincial level. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2021;111825. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111825.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li FY, Wang Z, Huang LX. Economic growth target and environmental regulation intensity: evidence from 284 cities in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(7):10235-49. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16269-0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Synergistic Governance of Digital Economy Development and Carbon Reduction: Evidence from Chinese Cities

References

Paradigm

My account