Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Digital Empowerment and Enterprise Carbon Risk Management: Evidence from Manufacturing Sector Cover

Digital Empowerment and Enterprise Carbon Risk Management: Evidence from Manufacturing Sector

By: Yan Han  
Open Access
|Jul 2024

References

  1. Hoffmann VH, Busch T. Corporate carbon performance indicators: Carbon intensity, dependency, exposure, and risk. J Industrial Ecol. 2008;12(4):505-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00066.x.
  2. Subramaniam N, Wahyuni D, Cooper BJ, Leung P, Wines G. Integration of carbon risks and opportunities in enterprise risk management systems: evidence from Australian firms. J Cleaner Prod. 2015;96(1):407-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.013.
  3. Gao B, Zhang J, Liu X. Does carbon risk amplify environmental uncertainty? Int Rev Economics Finance. 2023;88. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.037.
  4. Jung J, Herbohn K, Clarkson P. Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. J Business Ethics. 2018;150:1151-71. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3207-6.
  5. Clarkon PM, Li Y, Richapdson GD, Vasvari FP. Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. J Accounting Public Policy. 2011;30(2):122-44. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.955890.
  6. Li DY, Zheng M, Cao CC, Chen X, Ren S, Huang M. The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: evidence from China top 100. J Cleaner Prod. 2017;141(1):41-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.123.
  7. Dumrose M, Höck A. Corporate carbon-risk and credit-risk: the impact of carbon-risk exposure and management on credit spreads in different regulatory environments. Finance Research Lett. 2023;51:103414. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103414.
  8. Liu W, Tsai SB, Wu CH, Shao X, Wacławek M. Corporate environmental management and sustainable operation: theory and application. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2022;29(3):283-5. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2022-0020.
  9. Filak M, Hoffman S. Benzo(a)pyrene in PM10 - Air monitoring results in Poland. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2023;30(4):557-65. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2023-0048.
  10. Li J, Zhan G, Dai X, Qi M, Liu B. Innovation and optimization logic of grassroots digital governance in china under digital empowerment and digital sustainability. Sustainability. 2022;14(24):16470. DOI: 10.3390/su142416470.
  11. Ghasemaghaei M, Calic G. Assessing the impact of big data on firm innovation performance: Big data is not always better data. J Business Res. 2020;108:147-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.062.
  12. Tao F, Sui F, Liu A, Qi Q, Zhang M, Song B, et al. Digital twin-driven product design framework. Int J Prod Res. 2019;57(12):3935-53. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1443229.
  13. Adeniji D, Schoop J. In-situ calibrated digital process twin models for resource efficient manufacturing. J Manufacturing Sci Eng. 2022;144(4):041008. DOI: 10.1115/1.4052131.
  14. Nambisan S. Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice. 2017;41(6):1029-55. DOI: 10.1111/etap.12254.
  15. Autio E, Nambisan S, Thomas LDW, Wright M. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 2018;12(1):72-95. DOI: 10.1002/sej.1266.
  16. Bertl M, Metsallik J, Ross P. A systematic literature review of AI-based digital decision support systems for post-traumatic stress disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:923613. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.923613.
  17. Wu CH, Tsai SB, Liu W, Xue FS, Yang KX, Wacławek M. Green environment and sustainable development: methods and applications. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2021;28(4):467-70. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2021-0030.
  18. Jiang LH. Research on low carbon financial support strategies from the perspective of eco-environmental protection. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2021;28(4):525-39. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2021-0035.
  19. Mubeen R, Han D, Abbas J, Raza S, Bodian W. Examining the relationship between product market competition and Chinese firms performance: the mediating impact of capital structure and moderating influence of firm size. Front Psychol. 2022;12:709678. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709678.
  20. Haar J, O’Kane C, Daellenbach U. High performance work systems and innovation in New Zealand SMEs: testing firm size and competitive environment effects. Int J Human Resource Manage. 2022;33(16):3324-52. DOI: 0.1080/09585192.2021.1894213.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eces-2024-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Language: English
Page range: 193 - 202
Published on: Jul 10, 2024
Published by: Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Yan Han, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.