Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sustainable Innovation on Urban Landscape Construction and Ecological Water Environment Governance Process Cover

Sustainable Innovation on Urban Landscape Construction and Ecological Water Environment Governance Process

Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S
Volume 29 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)
By: Ke Li  
Open Access
|Oct 2022

References

  1. [1] Cooper GCK, Namit K. City with a billion dollar view. New Zealand Economic Papers. 2018;55(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1080/00779954.2018.1509110.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Camay S, Zielinski E, Zaranko A. New York City’s East River Ferry: expanding passenger ferry service and stimulating economic development in the New York City Region. Transportation Res Record. 2018;2274(1):192-200. DOI: 10.3141/2274-21.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Rees CV, Canizares JR, Garcia GM, Reed JM. Ecological stakeholder analogs as intermediaries between freshwater biodiversity conservation and sustainable water management. Environ Policy Governance. 2019;29(4):303-12. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1856.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Nykvist B, Borgstrm S, Boyd E. Assessing the adaptive capacity of multi-level water governance: ecosystem services under climate change in Mlardalen region, Sweden. Regional Environ Change. 2017;17(8):2359-71. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-017-1149-x.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Schulz C, Martin-Ortega J, Ioris AAR, Glenk K. Applying a ‘Value Landscapes Approach’ to conflicts in water governance: The case of the Paraguay-Paraná Waterway. Ecol Economics. 2017;138:47-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.033.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Cookey PE, Darnsawasdi R, Ratanachai C. Text mining analysis of institutional fit of Lake Basin water governance. Ecol Indicators. 2017; 72:640-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.057.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Roth AP, De Loe RC. Incorporating outcomes from collaborative processes into government decision making: A case study from low water response planning in Ontario, Canada. Ecol Economics. 2017;132:169-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.015.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Bischoff-Mattson Z, Lynch AH. Integrative governance of environmental water in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin: Evolving challenges and emerging pathways. Environ Manage. 2017;60(1):41-56. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0864-x.28412766
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Makota S, Nde-Tchoupe AI, Mwakabona HT, Tepong-Tsindé R, Noubactep C, Nassi A. Metallic iron for water treatment: Leaving the valley of confusion. Appl Water Sci. 2017;7(113):4177-96. DOI: 10.1007/s13201-017-0601-x.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Jesse B. Four steps to smart city success [Viewpoint]. IEEE Electrification Magazine. 2018;6(2):110-2. DOI: 10.1109/MELE.2018.2816849.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Kumar VTM. Advances in 21st century human settlements. Smart Economy in Smart Cities. Morgenstadt -A German View of the City of the Future. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-1610-3. (Chapter 11):253-72. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-1610-3_11.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Cosens B, Gunderson L. Practical Panarchy for Adaptive Water Governance. An Introduction to Practical Panarchy: Linking Law, Resilience, and Adaptive Water Governance of Regional Scale Social-Ecological Systems. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72472-0 (Chapter 1): 1-16. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72472-0_1.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Lerner AM, Eakin HC, Tellman E, Bausch JC, Aguilar BH. Governing the gaps in water governance and land-use planning in a megacity: The example of hydrological risk in Mexico City. Cities. 2018;83:61-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.009.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Porras GL, Stringer LC, Quinn CH. Unravelling stakeholder perceptions to enable adaptive water governance in dryland systems. Water Resources Manage. 2018;32(10):3285-301. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-018-1991-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Alexandra J. The city as nature and the nature of the city-climate adaptation using living infrastructure: governance and integration challenges. Australasian J Water Resources. 2017;21(2):63-76. DOI: 10.1080/13241583.2017.1405570.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Gondek K, Mierzwa-Hersztek M, Kopeć M, Spałek I. Compost produced with addition of sewage sludge as a source of Fe and Mn for plants. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2021;28(2):259-75. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2021-0019.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Wang S, Fu B, Bodin O, Liu J, Zhang M, Li X. Alignment of social and ecological structures increased the ability of river management. Sci Bull. 2019;64(18):30-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.07.016.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Hamoudi SA, Hamdi B, Brendle J. Tetracycline removal from water by adsorption on geomaterial, activated carbon and clay adsorbents. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2021;28(3):303-28. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2021-0021.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Benham CF. Aligning public participation with local environmental knowledge in complex marine social-ecological systems. Marine Policy. 2017;82:16-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.04.003.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Aagaard K, Lyons JE, Thogmartin WE. Quantifying the relative contribution of an ecological reserve to conservation objectives. Global Ecol Conservation. 2017;9:142-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2017.01.002.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Schnegg M, Kiaka RD. Subsidized elephants: Community-based resource governance and environmental (in) justice in Namibia. Geoforum. 2018;93:105-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.05.010.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Kistenkas FH, Bouwma IM. Barriers for the ecosystem services concept in European water and nature conservation law. Ecosystem Services. 2018;29(3):251-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.013.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Ilic P, Ilic S, Markic DN, Bjelić LS, Farooqi ZUR, Sole B. Source identification and ecological risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils and groundwater. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2021;28(3):355-63. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2021-0024.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Cheng R, Li W. Evaluating environmental sustainability of an urban industrial plan under the three-line environmental governance policy in China. J Environ Manage. 2019;251:109545.1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109545.31574375
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eces-2022-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 287 - 304
Published on: Oct 17, 2022
Published by: Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
urban landscape construction,
fuzzy evaluation criteria,
ecological water treatment,
sustainable innovation
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Sustainable and green chemistry,
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Energy engineering,
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2022 Ke Li, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 29 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)Next article