Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Effect of Maintenance Works to Physical and Chemical Conditions of Small Rivers in Agricultural Areas Cover

The Effect of Maintenance Works to Physical and Chemical Conditions of Small Rivers in Agricultural Areas

Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S
Volume 29 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)
By: Adam Brysiewicz,  Przemysław Czerniejewski,  Małgorzata Bonisławska and  Jarosław Dąbrowski  
Open Access
|Apr 2022

References

  1. [l] Williams P, Whitfield M, Biggs J, Bray S, Fox G, Nicolet P, et al. Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biol Conserv. 2004;115:329-41. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00153-8.10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00153-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Bezuidenhout J, Nekhoroshkov P, Zinicovscaia I, Yushin N, Frontasyeva M. Accumulation features of micro and macroelements in indigenous and alien molluscs in Saldanha Bay, South Africa. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2021;27(4):495-508. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2020-0030.10.2478/eces-2020-0030
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Nilsson C, Jansson R, Malmqvist B, Naiman R. Restoring riverine landscapes: the challenge of identifying priorities, reference states, and techniques. Ecol Society. 2007;12(1). Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26267827.10.5751/ES-02030-120116
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Oz N, Topal B, Uzun HI. Prediction of water quality in Riva River watershed. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2019;26(4):727-42. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2019-0051.10.1515/eces-2019-0051
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Naiman RJ, Bunn SE, Nilsson C, Petts GE, Pinay G, Thompson LC. Legitimizing fluvial ecosystems as users of water: an overview. Environ Manage. 2002;30:455-67. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-002-2734-3.10.1007/s00267-002-2734-312481913
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Oppeltová P, Boráková J. Monitoring of basic physicochemical parameters in the flow and their possible influence on the quality of the small water source. J Water Land Develop. 2020;44:106-17. DOI: 10.24425/jwld.2019.127051.10.24425/jwld.2019.127051
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Li S, Gu S, Liu W, Han H, Zhang Q. Water quality in relation to land use and land cover in the upper Han River Basin, China. Catena. 2014;75(2):216-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2008.06.005.10.1016/j.catena.2008.06.005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Brysiewicz A, Czerniejewski P. The effect of maintenance works on ichthyofauna in the context of hydrochemical conditions of small watercourses of central and north-western Poland. J Ecol Eng. 2019;20(8):82-9. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/110814.10.12911/22998993/110814
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Jędryka E. Needs of work management connected with conservation of surface water and water facilities at restoration areas. Infrastruktura Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich. 2006;4(2):43-50. Available from: http://www.infraeco.pl/pl/art/a_14991.htm.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Obeta MCh. Private for-profit rural water supply in Nigeria: Policy constraints and options for improved performance. J Water Land Develop. 2019;41:101-10. DOI: 10.2478/jwld-2019-0033.10.2478/jwld-2019-0033
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Naiman RJ, Bechtold JS, Drake DC, Latterell JJ, O’Keefe TC, Balian EV. Origins, Patterns, and Importance of Heterogeneity in Riparian Systems. In: Lovett GM, Turner MG, Jones CG, Weathers KC. Editors. Ecosystem Function in Heterogeneous Landscapes. 2005;279-309. New York, NY: Springer; 2005. DOI: 10.1007/0-387-24091-8_14.10.1007/0-387-24091-8_14
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Downs PW, Dusterhoff SR, Sears WA. Reach-scale channel sensitivity to multiple human activities and natural events: Lower Santa Clara River, California, USA. Geomorphology. 2013;189:121-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.01.023.10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.01.023
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Hachoł J, Bondar-Nowakowska E. Tendencies in the development of hydromacrophytes after the completion of regulatory and maintenance works in a river bed. Ecol Chem Eng A. 2012;19(9):997-1013. DOI: 10.2428/ecea.2012.19(09)096.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Aldridge DC. The impacts of dredging and weed cutting on a population of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Biol Conserv. 2000;95:247-57. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00045-8.10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00045-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Ochs K, Rivaes RP, Ferreira T, Egge G. Flow management to control excessive growth of macro-phytes -an assessment based on habitat suitability modeling. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:356-67. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00356.10.3389/fpls.2018.00356586813529616067
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Bellezza M, Nasini L, Casadei S, Standardi A. Watercourse maintenance: a look at the plants and hydrology of a case study on the Tiber River. River Basin Management III. WIT Press. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. 2005;83:443-53. Available from: www.witpress.com.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Hachoł J, Hämmerling M, Bondar-Nowakowska E. Applying the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) into the effects assessment of river training works. J Water Land Develop. 2017;35:63-72. DOI: 10.1515/jwld-2017-0069.10.1515/jwld-2017-0069
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Petkovska V, Urbanič G. Links between morphological parameters and benthic invertebrate assemblages, and general implications for hydromorphological river management. Ecohydrology. 2015;8:67-82. DOI: 10.1002/eco.1489.10.1002/eco.1489
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Vaughan IP, Diamond M, Gurnell AM, Hall KA, Jenkins A, Milner NJ, et al. Integrating ecology with hydromorphology: a priority for river science and management. Aquat Conserv Marine Freshwater Ecosyst. 2009;19(1):113-25. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.895.10.1002/aqc.895
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Mazerolle MJ. Drainage ditches facilitate frog movements in a hostile land-scape. Landscape Ecol. 2006;20:579-90. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-004-3977-6.10.1007/s10980-004-3977-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Davies B, Biggs J, Williams P, Whitfield M, Nicolet P, Sear D, et al. Comparative biodiversity of aquatic habitats in the European agricultural landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2008;125:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.10.006.10.1016/j.agee.2007.10.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Feld CL, De Bello F, Dolédec S. Biodiversity of traits and species both show weak responses to hydromorphological alteration in lowland river macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biol. 2014;59:233-48. DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12260.10.1111/fwb.12260
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Haidekker A, Hering D. Relationship between benthic insects (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Coleoptera, Trichoptera) and temperature in small and medium-sized streams in Germany: A multivariate study. Aquat Ecol. 2008;42:463-81. DOI: 10.1007/s10452-007-9097-z.10.1007/s10452-007-9097-z
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Dvurechenskaya SYa, Yermolaeva NI. Interrelations between chemical composition of waterand characteristics of zooplankton in the Novosibirsk Reservoir. Contemp Probl Ecol. 2014;7:465-73. DOI: 10.1134/S1995425514040039.10.1134/S1995425514040039
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Rajfur M. Algae - heavy metals biosorbent. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2013;20(1):23-40. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2013-0002.10.2478/eces-2013-0002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Barretto MG, Uieda VS. Influence of the abiotic factors on the ichthyofauna composition in different orders stretches of Capivara River, São Paulo State, Brazil. Verh Internat Verein Limnol. 1998;26:2180-3. DOI: 10.1080/03680770.1995.11901132.10.1080/03680770.1995.11901132
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Cohen Y, Cohen JY. Statistics and Data with R. An Applied Aproach Trough Examples. The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley; 2008. ISBN: 9780470758052.10.1002/9780470721896
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Marques de Sa J, Joaquim P. Applied Statistics Using SPSS, STATISTICA, MATLAB and R. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer; 2007. ISBN: 9783540719717.10.1007/978-3-540-71972-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Brysiewicz A, Bonisławska M, Czerniejewski P, Kierasiński B. Quality analysis of waters from selected small watercourses within the river basins of Odra river and Wisła river. Annual Set Environ Protection. 2019;21:1202-16. https://ros.edu.pl/images/roczniki/2019/072_ROS_V21_R2019.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Meybeck M. The global change of continental aquatic systems: dominant impacts of human activities. Water Sci Technol. 2004;49(7):73-83. DOI:10.2166/wst.2004.0420.10.2166/wst.2004.0420
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Rabalais NN. Nitrogen in aquatic ecosystems. Ambio: J Human Environment. 2002;31(2):102-112. DOI:10.1579/0044-7447-31.2.102.10.1579/0044-7447-31.2.10212077998
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Obolewski K, Osadowski Z, Miler M. Sposoby renaturyzacji małych cieków na przykładzie rzeki Kwaczy [Dolina Słupi] (Renaturation methods for small river basins in the example of the Kwacza River [Slupia River basin]). Nauka Przyr Technol. 2009;3(3):1-11. http://www.npt.up-poznan.net/pub/art_3_95.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Moore M, Locke MA, Jenkins M, Steinriede RW, McChesney DS. Dredging effects on selected nutrient concentrations and ecoenzymatic activity in two drainage ditch sediments in the lower Mississippi River Valley. Int Soil Water Conserv Res. 2017;5(3):190-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.06.004.10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.06.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Smith DR, Warnemuende EA, Haggard BE, Huang C. Dredging of drainage ditches increases short term transport of soluble phosphorus. J Environ Quality. 2006;35(2):611-6. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0301.10.2134/jeq2005.030116510706
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Mitsuoa Y, Tsunodab H, Kozawac G, Yuma M. Response of the fish assemblage structure in a small farm pond to management dredging operations. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2014;188:93-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.02.015.10.1016/j.agee.2014.02.015
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Dąbkowski P, Buczyński P, Zawal A, Stępień E, Buczyńska E, Stryjecki R, et al. The impact of dredging of a small lowland river on water beetle fauna (Coleoptera). J Limnol. 2016;75(3):472-87. DOI: 10.4081/jlimnol.2016.1270.10.4081/jlimnol.2016.1270
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Zawal A, Czachorowski S, Stępień E, Buczyńska E, Szlauer-Łukaszewska A, Buczyński P, et al. Early post-dredging recolonization of caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) in a small lowland river (NW Poland). Limnology. 2016;17:71-85. DOI: 10.1007/s10201-015-0466-3.10.1007/s10201-015-0466-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Buczyński P, Zawal A, Buczyńska E, Stępień E, Dąbkowski P, Michoński G, et al. Early recolonization of a dredged lowland river by dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata). Knowl Manage Aquat Ecosyst. 2016;417(43):1-11. DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2016030.10.1051/kmae/2016030
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Wenger AS, Harvey E, Wilson S, Rawson C, Newman SJ, Clarke D, et al. A critical analysis of the direct effects of dredging on fish. Fish Fisheries. 2017;18:967-85. DOI: 10.1111/faf.12218.10.1111/faf.12218
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Rosenvald R, Järvekülg R, Lõhmus A. Fish assemblages in forest drainage ditches: Degraded small streamsor novel habitats? Limnologica. 2014;46:37-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.limno.2013.12.004.10.1016/j.limno.2013.12.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Bączyk A, Wagner M, Okruszko T, Grygoruk M. Influence of technical maintenance measures on ecological status of agricultural lowland rivers - systematic review and implications for river management. Sci Tot Environ. 2018;627:189-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.235.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.23529426140
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Bal KD, Meire P. The influence of macrophyte cutting on the hydraulic resistance of lowland rivers. J Aquat Plant Manage. 2009;47:65-68. Available from: https://www.apms.org/wp-content/uploads/japm-47-01-065.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Clarke SJ. Conserving freshwater biodiversity: the value, status and management of high quality ditch systems. J Nature Conserv. 2015;224:93-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2014.10.003.10.1016/j.jnc.2014.10.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eces-2022-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 39 - 49
Published on: Apr 22, 2022
Published by: Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
desilting,
small rivers,
water quality,
biogenes
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Sustainable and green chemistry,
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Energy engineering,
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2022 Adam Brysiewicz, Przemysław Czerniejewski, Małgorzata Bonisławska, Jarosław Dąbrowski, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 29 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)Next article