Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Need for Cognitive Closure, Information Acquisition and Adoption of Green Prevention and Control Technology Cover

Need for Cognitive Closure, Information Acquisition and Adoption of Green Prevention and Control Technology

By: Qiong Wu and  Jing Zhou  
Open Access
|Apr 2021

References

  1. [1] Pan Y, Ren Y, Luning PA. Factors influencing Chinese farmers’ proper pesticide application in agricultural products - A review. Food Control. 2021;122:107788. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107788.10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107788
  2. [2] Gao Y, Zhao D, Yu L. Duration analysis on the adoption behavior of green control techniques. Environ Science Pollut Res. 2019;26:6319-27. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-04088-9.10.1007/s11356-018-04088-930617899
  3. [3] Arthanareeswaran G, Curcio S, Chakraborty S. Special Issue: Green technologies for environmental pollution control and prevention. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 2015;134(pt.2):287. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.09.032.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.09.03227772697
  4. [4] Pan D, He M, Kong F. Risk attitude, risk perception, and farmers’ pesticide application behavior in China: A moderation and mediation model. J Cleaner Prod. 2020;276(10):124241. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124241.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124241
  5. [5] Kruglanski AW, Webster DM, Klem A. Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;65(5):861-76. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.861.10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.861
  6. [6] De Dreu CKW, Koole SL, Oldersma FL. On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Addiction. 1999;25(3):348-62. DOI: 10.1177/0146167299025003007.10.1177/0146167299025003007
  7. [7] Keersmaecker JD, Dunning D, Pennycook G, Rand DG, Roets A. Investigating the robustness of the illusory truth effect across individual differences in cognitive ability, need for cognitive closure, and cognitive style. Personality Social Psychol Bull. 2020;46(2):204-15. DOI: 10.1177/0146167219853844.10.1177/014616721985384431179863
  8. [8] Simon HA. Theories of bounded rationality. Decision Organization. 1972:161-76. Available from: https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=418864.
  9. [9] Webster DM, Kruglanski AW. Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. J Personality Social Psychol. 1994;67(6):1049-62. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049.10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
  10. [10] Andrews D. The interplay of information diagnosticity and need for cognitive closure in determining choice confidence. Psychol Marketing. 2013;30(9):749-64. DOI: 10.1002/mar.20643.10.1002/mar.20643
  11. [11] Neuberg SL, Judice TN, West SG. What the need for closure scale measures and what it does not: Toward differentiating among related epistemic motives. J Personality Social Psychol. 1997;72(6):1396-412. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1396.10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1396
  12. [12] Song Y, Fan T, Tang Y. Quality information acquisition and ordering decisions with risk aversion. Int J Prod Res. 2020;(6):1-17. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1828640.10.1080/00207543.2020.1828640
  13. [13] Guo ML, Jia XP, Huang JK, Kumar KB, Burger NE. Farmer field school and farmer knowledge acquisition in rice production: Experimental evaluation in China. Agricult Ecosystems Environ. 2015;209:100-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.011.10.1016/j.agee.2015.02.011
  14. [14] Thuo M, Bell AA, Bravo-Ureta BE, Lachaud MA, Puppala N. Effects of social network factors on information acquisition and adoption of improved groundnut varieties: the case of Uganda and Kenya. Agricult Human Values. 2014;31(3). DOI: 10.1007/s10460-014-9486-6.10.1007/s10460-014-9486-6
  15. [15] Genius, M, Pantzios, CJ, Tzouvelekas V. Information acquisition and adoption of organic farming practices. J Agricult Resource Economics. 2006;31. DOI: 10.1080/028418500127345064.10.1080/028418500127345064
  16. [16] Colombo L, Femminis G, Pavan A. Information acquisition and welfare. Discussion Papers. 2014;81(4):1438-83. DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdu015.10.1093/restud/rdu015
  17. [17] Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Res Methods Instruments Computers. 2004;36(4):717-31. DOI: 10.3758/BF03206553.10.3758/BF0320655315641418
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eces-2021-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Language: English
Page range: 129 - 143
Published on: Apr 23, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Qiong Wu, Jing Zhou, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.