Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Empirical Study on How Climate and Environmental Issues Awareness Affects Low Carbon Use Behaviour Cover

An Empirical Study on How Climate and Environmental Issues Awareness Affects Low Carbon Use Behaviour

Open Access
|Apr 2020

References

  1. [1] Esmaeilifar R, Iranmanesh M, Shafiei MWM, Hyun SS. Effects of low carbon waste practices on job satisfaction of site managers through job stress. Rev Managerial Sci. 2018;3:1–22. DOI: 10.1007/s11846-018-0288-x.10.1007/s11846-018-0288-x
  2. [2] Dahlmann F, Branicki L, Brammer S. Managing carbon aspirations: The influence of corporate climate change targets on environmental performance. J Business Ethics. 2019;158(1):1–24. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3731-z.10.1007/s10551-017-3731-z
  3. [3] Wang L, Wei F, Zhang X. Why does energy-saving behavior rise and fall? A study on consumer face consciousness in the Chinese context. J Business Ethics. 2019;160(2):499–513. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-018-3944-9.10.1007/s10551-018-3944-9
  4. [4] Chen LF. Green certification, e-commerce, and low-carbon economy for international tourist hotels. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26(18):17965–73. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-2161-5.10.1007/s11356-018-2161-529785607
  5. [5] Chen H, Long R, Niu W, Feng Q, Yang R. How does individual low-carbon consumption behaviour occur? An analysis based on attitude process. Appl Energy. 2014;116(5):376–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.027.10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.027
  6. [6] Kenny T, Gray NF. A preliminary survey of household and personal carbon dioxide emissions in Ireland. Environ Int. 2009;35(2):259–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.06.008.10.1016/j.envint.2008.06.00818718663
  7. [7] Kerkhof AC, Benders RMJ, Moll HC. Determinants of variation in household CO2 emissions between and within countries. Energy Policy. 2009;37(4):1509–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.013.10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.013
  8. [8] Hines JM, Hungerford HR, Tomera AN. Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behaviour: A meta-analysis. J Environ Educat. 1986;18(2):1–8. DOI: 10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482.10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482
  9. [9] Cheung SF, Chan DKS, Wong ZSY. Reexamining the theory of planned behaviour in understanding wastepaper recycling. Environ Behaviour. 1999;31(5):587–612. DOI: 10.1177/00139169921972254.10.1177/00139169921972254
  10. [10] Lin RJ. Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. J Clean Production. 2013;40:32–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.010.10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.010
  11. [11] Chen J, Cheng J, Dai S. Regional eco-innovation in China: an analysis of eco-innovation levels and influencing factors. J Cleaner Production. 2017;153:1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.141.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.141
  12. [12] Guan JC, Chen KH. Measuring the innovation production process: A cross-region empirical study of China’s high-tech innovation. Technovation. 2010;30: 348–58. DOI: 10.3923/itj.2011.1484.1497.10.3923/itj.2011.1484.1497
  13. [13] Sun LY, Miao CL, Yang L. Ecological-economic efficiency evaluation of green technology innovation in strategic emerging industries based on entropy weighted TOPSIS method. Ecological Indicators. 2017;73:554–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.018.10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.018
  14. [14] Liang XD, Si DY, Zhang XL. Regional sustainable development analysis based on information entropy -Sichuan province as an example. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:1219. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14101219.10.3390/ijerph14101219566472029027982
  15. [15] Kiefer CP, Carrillo-Hermosilla J, Rio PD, Barroso FJC. Diversity of eco-innovations: a quantitative approach. J Cleaner Production. 2017;166:1494–506. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.241.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.241
  16. [16] Kalinichenko A, Havrysh V. Environmentally friendly fuel usage: Economic margin of feasibility. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2019;26(2):241–54. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2019-0030.10.1515/eces-2019-0030
  17. [17] Arfi WB, Hikkerova L, Sahut JM. External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance. Technological Forecasting Social Change. 2018;129:210–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.017.10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.017
  18. [18] Negev M, Paz S, Clermont A, Pri-Or NG, Shalom U, Yeqer T, et al. Impacts of climate change on vector borne diseases in the Mediterranean basin-implications for preparedness and adaptation policy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(6):6745–70. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120606745.10.3390/ijerph120606745448372826084000
  19. [19] Bhore SJ. Paris agreement on climate change: a booster to enable sustainable global development and beyond. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13:1134. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13111134.10.3390/ijerph13111134512934427854248
  20. [20] Huang G, Ali S. Local sustainability and gender ratio: evaluating the impacts of mining and tourism on sustainable development in Yunnan, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:927–39. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120100927.10.3390/ijerph120100927430690225607602
  21. [21] Marszałek M, Kowalski Z, Makara A. The possibility of contamination of water-soil environment as a result of the use of pig slurry. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2019; 26(2):313–30. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2019-0022.10.1515/eces-2019-0022
  22. [22] Nordfjærn T, Rundmo T. Acceptance of disincentives to driving and pro-environmental transport intentions: the role of value structure, environmental beliefs and norm activation. Transportation. 2019;46(6):2381–96. DOI: 10.1007/s11116-018-9950-z.10.1007/s11116-018-9950-z
  23. [23] Wang E, Kang N. Does life satisfaction matter for pro-environmental behavior? Empirical evidence from China General Social Survey. Quality Quantity. 2019;53(1):449–69. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-018-0763-0.10.1007/s11135-018-0763-0
  24. [24] Bamberg S, Möser G. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol. 2007;27(1):14–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002.10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
  25. [25] Barber NA, Taylor DC, Remar D. Desirability bias and perceived effectiveness influence on willingness-to-pay for pro-environmental wine products. Int J Wine Business Res. 2016;28(3):206–27. DOI: 10.1108/IJWBR-09-2015-0042/full/html.
  26. [26] Hanss D, Böhm G. Promoting purchases of sustainable groceries: An intervention study. J Environ Psychology. 2013;33(2):53–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.10.002.10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.10.002
  27. [27] Lee YK, Kim S, Kim MS, Kim MS, Choi JG. Antecedents and interrelationships of three types of pro-environmental behaviour. J Business Res. 2014;67(10):2097–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.018.10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.018
  28. [28] Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behaviour change. Psychological Rev. 1977;84(3):191–215. DOI: 10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4.10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4
  29. [29] Thompson SC. Will it hurt less if I can control it ? A complex answer to a simple question. Psychol Bull. 1981;90(1):89–101. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.89.10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.89
  30. [30] Ellen PS, Wiener JL, Cobb-Walgren C. The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviours. J Public Policy Marketing. 1991;10(2):102–17. DOI: 10.1177/074391569101000206.10.1177/074391569101000206
  31. [31] Roberts JA. Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. J Business Res. 1996;36(3):217–31. DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(95)00150-6.10.1016/0148-2963(95)00150-6
  32. [32] Straughan RD, Roberts JA. Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behaviour in the new millennium. J Consumer Marketing. 1999;16(6):558–75. DOI :10.1108/07363769910297506.10.1108/07363769910297506
  33. [33] Kabaday ET, Dursun İ, Alan AK, Tuğer AT. Green purchase intention of young Turkish consumers: Effects of consumer's guilt, self-monitoring and perceived consumer effectiveness. Procedia - Social Behavioral Sci. 2015;207:165–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.167.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.167
  34. [34] Hungerford HR, Volk TL. Changing learner behaviour through environmental education. J Environ Education. 1990;21(3):8–21. DOI: 10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743.10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743
  35. [35] Zeithaml VA. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J Marketing. 1988;52(3):2–22. DOI: 10.2307/1251446.10.2307/1251446
  36. [36] Mwencha PM, Muathe SM, Thuo JK. Effect of perceived attributes, perceived risk and perceived value on usage of online retailing services. J Manage Res. 2014;6(2):140–61. DOI: 10.5296/jmr.v6i2.5224.10.5296/jmr.v6i2.5224
  37. [37] Lu H, Liu X, Chen H, Long R. Employee-organization pro-environmental values fit and pro-environmental behavior: The role of supervisors’ personal values. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019;25(2):519–57. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-0007-z.10.1007/s11948-017-0007-z
  38. [38] Schwarta SH. Nomative influences on altruism. Advances Exp Social Psychology. 1977;(10):221–79. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
  39. [39] Kaiser FG, Doka G, Hofstetter P, Ranney MA. Ecological behaviour and its environmental consequences: a life cycle assessment of a self-report measure. J Environ Psychology. 2003;23(1):11–20. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00075-0.10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00075-0
  40. [40] Gärling T, Fuijii S, Gärling A, Jakobsson C. Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of proenvironmental behaviour intention. J Environ Psychology. 2003;23(1):1–9. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00081-6.10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00081-6
  41. [41] Geng J, Long R, Chen H, Li Q. Urban residents' response to and evaluation of low-carbon travel policies: Evidence from a survey of five eastern cities in China. J Environ Management. 2018;217:47–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.091.10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.09129587200
  42. [42] Tsai SB, Wang K. Using a novel method to evaluate the performance of human resources in green logistics enterprises. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2019;26(4):629–40. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2019-0045.10.1515/eces-2019-0045
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eces-2020-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Language: English
Page range: 55 - 66
Published on: Apr 24, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Su-Ping Huang, Shan-Zi Ma, Yang Pan, Yan Li, Yu-Hsi Yuan, Sang-Bing Tsai, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.