Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Copilot as a methodological partner in plant physiology: Proof of concept using common bean leaf dehydration Cover

Copilot as a methodological partner in plant physiology: Proof of concept using common bean leaf dehydration

Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Kumar K, Sharma R, Ranjan K, Pandey DK. Artificial Intelligence in Biotechnology. In: Mohanan PV, editor. Artificial Intelligence and Biological Sciences. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2025. pp. 192-218.
  2. Kalita I, Bhattacharjee S, Saharia M. Advancements in medicinal plant research: Harnessing artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, and bioinformatics. In: Mohanan PV, editor. Biotechnology, Multiple Omics, and Precision Breeding in Medicinal Plants. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2025. pp. 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003475491-11
  3. Mohanan PV, editor. Artificial Intelligence and Biological Sciences. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2025. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003492726
  4. Su X, Xu J, Li C, Wei M. The research progress on crop stress resistance and environmental adaptability improvement based on artificial intelligence. Adv Resour Res. 2025; 5 (3): 1589-1610. https://doi.org/10.50908/arr.5.3_1589
  5. Garcia-Oliveira AL, Dwivedi SL, Chander S, Nelimor C, Abd El Moneim D, Ortiz RO. Breeding smarter: Artificial intelligence and machine learning tools in modern breeding – a review. Agronomy. 2026; 16 (1): 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010137
  6. Das S, Karmakar S. Artificial intelligence in omics-assisted crop breeding and genetic enhancement. In: Mohanan PV, editor. AI in Plant Science and Precision Agriculture. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2025. pp. 327-345.
  7. Luna-Maldonado AI. Data-driven plant phenotyping: Integrating artificial intelligence and imaging technologies for precision crop improvement. In: Precision Agriculture – Data-Driven Technologies for Sustainable Food Production. London: IntechOpen; 2026. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1014679
  8. Yang X, Chen X, Zhu Y. AI-driven phenotyping platforms for large-scale cotton field trials. Field Crop Res. 2025; 8: 139-153.
  9. Valencia Albornoz RG. Metabolomics and machine learning to assist biotechnology culture optimisation [dissertation]. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh; 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/6074
  10. Pepe M, Hesami M, Jones AMP. A comprehensive guide to machine learning-mediated optimization of medium composition for enhanced in vitro performance. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2025; 69: 103810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2025.103810
  11. Sharma D, Singh K. AI-enhanced bioprocess technologies: Machine learning implementations from upstream to downstream operations. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025; 41 (8): 278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-025-04494-5
  12. Aijaz N, Lan H, Raza T, Yaqub M, Iqbal R, Pathan MS. Artificial intelligence in agriculture: Advancing crop productivity and sustainability. J Agric Food Res. 2025; 20: 101762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101762
  13. Wah KNJ. The role of AI in transforming agriculture: Toward sustainable growth in an era of climate change. Sci Cult. 2025; 11 (2): 45-63. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15587933
  14. Alawi ZB. A comparative survey of PyTorch vs TensorFlow for deep learning: Usability, performance, and deployment trade-offs. arXiv. 2025; arXiv: 2508.04035. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.04035
  15. Chen Y, Wan Z, Zhuang Y, Liu N, Lo D, Yang X. Understanding the OSS communities of deep learning frameworks: A comparative case study of PyTorch and Tensor-Flow. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol. 2025; 34 (3): 70 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3705303
  16. Uyar MU. Machine learning and AI with simple Python and Matlab scripts: Courseware for non-computing majors. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2025.
  17. Yu X, Xie L, Guo Z, Wang A, Lu Z. A project-based learning approach: Designing MATLAB-aligned mixed-signal circuit components with open source tools. Comput Appl Eng Educ. 2026; 34 (1): e70141. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70141
  18. Rathod PR. A research review on comparative analysis of data mining tools and techniques. IJSAT-Int J Sci Technol. 2025; 16 (3): 25037067. https://doi.org/10.71097/IJSAT.v16.i3.7067
  19. Apostoloska Kondoska M, Ristevski B, Rendevski N, Savoska S. Comparative analysis of text mining techniques and tools. In: XV International Conference on Applied Internet and Information Technologies (AIIT 2025); 2025; Macedonia. pp. 1-24. https://eprints.uklo.edu.mk/id/eprint/11309
  20. Corradini F, Mozzoni L, Piangerelli M, Re B, Rossi L. A framework for rapidly prototyping data mining pipelines. Big Data Cogn Comput. 2025; 9 (6): 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc9060150
  21. Musunuri A. Machine learning workflows in the cloud: An overview of AI-based data processing techniques and architectures. In: 2025 International Conference on Communication and Smart Devices (ICCoSD); 2025; India. Piscataway: IEEE; 2025. pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCoSD66074.2025.11348590
  22. Bershchanskyi Y, Oberyshyn R, Klym H. Designing scalable architectures for cloud-based AI-driven systems. In: 13th International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS); 2025; Poland. Piscataway: IEEE; 2025. pp. 1016-1020. https://doi.org/10.109/IDAACS68557.2025.11322157
  23. Zac CH, Rana ME, Jayabalan M, Hameed VA. Leveraging cloud computing for enhanced artificial intelligence and machine learning: A comprehensive analysis of service models, deployment strategies, and provider offerings. In: Bhateja V, Biju SM, Udgata SK, eds. Proceedings of Eighth International Conference on Information System Design and Intelligent Applications. Singapore: Springer; 2025. pp. 559-571.
  24. Menon S. The AI Copilot paradigm: Boosting productivity without replacing humans. J Comput Sci Technol Stud. 2025; 7 (6): 494-500.
  25. Gupta N. The rise of AI copilots: Redefining human-machine collaboration in knowledge work. Int J Humanit Inf Technol. 2025; 7 (3): 1-11.
  26. Perumal RA. The role of AI tools like ChatGPT and Co-pilot in revolutionizing software development and user experiences. Int J Adv Res Ideas Innov Technol. 2025; 11 (1): 125-131.
  27. Daud ML, Binagwa PH, Mwaipopo BV, Mbanzibwa DR, Mohhamed SO, Chilagane LA, Nchimbi-Msolla S. Climate change, disease dynamics, and breeding responses in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production in Tanzania: A systematic review (2005–2025). Front Clim. 2026; 8: 1763987. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2026.1763987
  28. Fayaz S, Lone AA, Mir BA, Dar ZA, Rather MA, Peer LA. Integrative strategies for enhancing drought tolerance in common beans: Physiological, biochemical, and genetic perspectives. J Plant Growth Regul. 2026; 45 (1): 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-025-11867-5
  29. Havyarimana J, Faye D, Anoman M, Dione D, Diop I, editores. The effects of climate change on the spread of the common bean diseases. In: 6th International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET); 2026. Piscataway: IEEE; 2026.
  30. Yetgin A. Revolutionizing multi-omics analysis with artificial intelligence and data processing. Quant Biol. 2025; 13 (3): e70002. https://doi.org/10.1002/qub2.70002
  31. Pranandi I, Tjhay F. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in biochemical and molecular diagnostics: A transformative review of current applications and future prospects. Anal Methods. 2025; 11 (3): 4138-4147. https://doi.org10.22399/ijcesen.2634
  32. Shoaib M, Khan SU, AbdelHameed H, Qahmash A. Plant stress detection using multimodal imaging and machine learning: From leaf spectra to smartphone applications. Front Plant Sci. 2025; 16: 1670593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1670593
  33. Muhammad A, Khan ZU, Khan J, Mashori AS, Ali A, Ja-been N, Han Z, Li F. A comprehensive review of crop stress detection: Destructive, non-destructive, and ML-based approaches. Front Plant Sci. 2025; 16: 1638675. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1638675
  34. Vennam RR, Chandel AK, Haak DC, Oakes J, Balota M. Leaf wilting as a phenotypic indicator of heat and drought stress in crops: An overview of physiological mechanisms and machine learning applications. Discov Agric. 2026; 4 (1): 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-026-00506-6
  35. Fuente-Ballesteros A, Samanidou V, Daryanavard SM, Ares AM, Bernal J. Artificial intelligence as a scientific co-pilot in analytical chemistry: Transforming how we write, review, and publish. Anal Chem. 2025; 97 (38): 20667-20672. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c03767
  36. International Seed Testing Association. International rules for seed testing. Bassersdorf: ISTA; 2005. https://www.seed-test.org/en/publications/international-rules-seed-testing.html
  37. Pan Y, Sun J, Yu H, Luck J, Bai G, Chamara N, Ge Y, Awada T. Building multi-agent copilot towards autonomous agricultural data management and analysis. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData); 2024; USA. Piscataway: IEEE; 2024. pp. 4384-4393. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData62323.2024.10826038
  38. Fontenelle MR, da Silva KMNB, Silva KCR, Rodrigues GSS, Jorge MHA, Lima CEP. Plant growth-promoting bacteria and generative AI validation in sustainable lettuce seedling production systems. Rev DCS. 2025; 22 (83): e3634. https://doi.org/10.54899/dcs.v22i83.3634
  39. North SM, Stachura E, North MM. Fractal applications and generation: A concise descriptive exploration. Int Manag Rev. 2025; 21 (2): 36-83.
  40. Ahmed B. Fractal geometry in nature: Applications in physics and mathematical theory. Front Appl Phys Math. 2024; 1 (2): 129-145. https://doi.org/10.71465/fapm14
  41. Cheeseman AK, Vrscay ER. Estimating the fractal dimensions of vascular networks and other branching structures: Some words of caution. Mathematics. 2022; 10 (5): 839. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10050839
  42. Naskręcki B, Malinowski J, Dauter Z, Jaskolski M. Growth functions of periodic space tessellations. Found Crystallogr. 2025; 81 (1): 64-81. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273324010763
  43. Kalogeropoulou M, van Kampen KA, Fucile P, Mota C, Moroni L. Patterning the void: Combining L-systems with Archimedean tessellations as a perspective for tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv Funct Mater. 2025; 36 (1): e08763. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202508763
  44. Trautwein I, Eris M, Ravlija D, Sonntag M. Comparison of approaches for tessellating a business area using Voronoi diagrams. J Electr Syst Inf Technol. 2025; 12 (1): 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43067-025-00271-4
  45. Iannaccone PM, Khokha M, eds. Fractal geometry in biological systems: An analytical approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1996.
  46. Losa GA. The fractal geometry of life. Riv Biol. 2009; 102 (1): 29-59.
  47. Bizzarri M, Giuliani A, Cucina A, D’Anselmi F, Soto AM, Sonnenschein C. Fractal analysis in a systems biology approach to cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2011; 21 (3): 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2011.04.002
  48. Phillips D. Tessellation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2014; 6 (3): 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1298
  49. Brooke JM, James SS, Jimenez-Rodriguez A, Wilson SP. Biological action at a distance: Correlated pattern formation in adjacent tessellation domains without communication. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18 (3): e1009963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009963
  50. Bock M, Tyagi AK, Kreft J-U, Alt W. Generalized Voronoi tessellation as a model of two-dimensional cell tissue dynamics. Bull Math Biol. 2010; 72 (7): 1696-1731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-009-9498-3
  51. Arvizu Alonso AK, Armendáriz Mireles EN, Calles Arriaga CA, Rocha Rangel E. Control of the properties of the Voronoi tessellation technique and biomimetic patterns: A review. Designs. 2024; 8 (5): 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs8050093
  52. Davison A, Barron S, Blood A, Taylor R. Fractal complexity in visual nature: Perceptual preferences of leaf silhouettes and implications for biophilic design. Trees People. 2025; 22 (1): 100996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100996
  53. Gilevich A, Shoval S, Nosonovsky M, Frenkel M, Bormashenko E. Converting tessellations into graphs: From Voronoi tessellations to complete graphs. Mathematics. 2024; 12 (15): 2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12152426
  54. Hartvigsen G. The analysis of leaf shape using fractal geometry. Am Biol Teach. 2000; 62 (9): 664-669. https://doi.org/10.2307/4451007
  55. Vishnu M, Jaishanker R. Fractal-thermodynamic system analogy and complexity of plant leaves. Environ Res Commun. 2023; 5 (5): 055013. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/acd5b0
Language: English
Page range: 226 - 233
Published on: Jul 23, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Julio César Quintana-Zaez, Julio Ynchausti, María De Lourdes Tapia Y Figueroa, Julio Chico-Ruíz, Yanier Acosta, Oscar Vicente, José Carlos Lorenzo, published by European Biotechnology Thematic Network Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.