References
- Fasoula V A, Fasoula D A. Principles underlying genetic improvement for high and stable crop yield potential. Field Crops Res. 2002, 75(3): 191-209.
- Swarup S, Cargill E J, Crosby K, Flagel L, Kniskern J, Glenn K C. Genetic diversity is indispensable for plant breeding to improve crops. Crop Sci. 2021, 61(2): 839-852.
- Anilkumar C, Sunitha N, Harikrishna, Devate N B, Ramesh S. Advances in integrated genomic selection for rapid genetic gain in crop improvement: a review. Planta 2022, 256(5): 1-87.
- Begna T. Combining ability and heterosis in plant improvement. J. Plant Sci. 2021, 6(1): 108-117.
- Ahmar S, Mahmood T, Fiaz S, Mora-Poblete F, Shafique M S, Chattha M S, Jung K-H. Advantage of nanotechnology-based genome editing system and its application in crop improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12(1): 1-6.
- Roychowdhury R, Das S P, Das S, Biswas S, Patel M K, Kumar A, Sarker U, Choudhary S P, Das R, Yogendra K. Advancing vegetable genetics with gene editing: a pathway to food security and nutritional resilience in climate-shifted environments. Funct. Integr. Gen. 2025, 25(1): 1-32.
- Anyshchenko A. Aligning policy design with science to achieve food security: the contribution of genome editing to sustainable agriculture. Front. Sust. Food Syst. 2022, 6(1): 1-8.
- Abdul Aziz M, Brini F, Rouached H, Masmoudi K. Genetically engineered crops for sustainably enhanced food production systems. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13(1): 1-10.
- Kumar A, Anju T, Kumar S, Chhapekar S S, Sreedharan S, Singh S, Choi S R, Ramchiary N, Lim Y P. Integrating omics and gene editing tools for rapid improvement of traditional food plants for diversified and sustainable food security. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(15): 1-9.
- Rahman S U, McCoy E, Raza G, Ali Z, Mansoor S, Amin I. Improvement of soybean; a way forward transition from genetic engineering to new plant breeding technologies. Mol. Biotechnol. 2023, 65(2): 162-180.
- Riviello-Flores M d l L, Cadena-Iñiguez J, Ruiz-Posadas L d M, Arévalo-Galarza M d L, Castillo-Juárez I, Soto Hernández M, Castillo-Martínez C R. Use of gamma radiation for the genetic improvement of underutilized plant varieties. Plants 2022, 11(9): 1-11.
- Yan Y, Zhu X, Yu Y, Li C, Zhang Z, Wang F. Nanotechnology strategies for plant genetic engineering. Adv. Mat. 2022, 34(7): 1-21.
- Aziz M A, Masmoudi K. Molecular breakthroughs in modern plant breeding techniques. Hort. Plant J. 2025, 11(1): 15-41.
- Brar D, Khush G S. in Mechanisms of Plant Growth and Improved Productivity Modern Approaches, Basra A S, Editor. CRC Press: New York. 2021, 229-278.
- Ferreira M d S, Rocha A d J, Nascimento F d S, Oliveira W D d S, Soares J M d S, Rebouças T A, Morais Lino L S, Haddad F, Ferreira C F, Santos-Serejo J A d. The role of somaclonal variation in plant genetic improvement: a systematic review. Agronomy 2023, 13(3): 1-30.
- Ranghoo-Sanmukhiya V. Somaclonal variation and methods used for its detection. Prop. Genet. Manip. Plants 2021, 1(1): 1-18.
- Duta-Cornescu G, Constantin N, Pojoga D-M, Nicuta D, Simon-Gruita A. Somaclonal variation—advantage or disadvantage in micropropagation of the medicinal plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(1): 1-8.
- 1Ghosh A, Igamberdiev A U, Debnath S C. Tissue culture-induced DNA methylation in crop plants: a review. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48(1): 823-841.
- 1Dorani E, Dehghanian Z, Gougerdchi V, Hamedpour-Darabi M. in Plant Mutagenesis: Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Landscapes, Kumar N, Editor. Springer: Switzerland. 2024, 93-109.
- 2Manchanda P, Sharma D, Kaur G, Kaur H, Vanshika. Exploring the significance of somaclonal variations in horticultural crops. Mol. Biotechnol. 2024, 1-19.
- 2Rai M K, Rathour R, Yadav S, Singh A, Kaushik S. in Somaclonal Variation: Basic and Practical Aspects, Sánchez-Romero C, Editor. Springer: Switzerland. 2024, 99-121.
- 2Abiri R. in Tissue Culture Techniques and Medicinal Plants, Husen A and Pant M, Editors. CRC Press: United Kindom. 2024, 134-161.
- 2Singh M K. An overview on somaclonal variation. Int. Mult. Res. J. 2021, 11(10): 1187-1194.
- 2Rahman A, Alam R, Afrin H, Ahmed M. Somaclonal variation-A gateway for varietal improvement of non-flowering sugarcane germplasms. Bangladesh J 2022, 42(1): 45-49.
- Memon Z F, Baloch S, Ali M, Khan I A, Khaskheli A J, Yasmine S, Chachar S, Qambrani Z, Magsi B, Shah S Z H. Evaluation of soma-clonal variation in CP-671026 mutant of sugarcane (Saccharum officinrum L) through morphological techniques. J. Appl. Res. Plant Sci. 2023, 4(1): 494-500.
- 2Abo-Elwafa A, Bakheit B, El-Taib A, Noby N. Evaluation of some new somaclones of sugarcane for yield and quality. SVU-Int. J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 3(1): 129-139.
- 2Miyao A. in Somaclonal Variation: Basic and Practical Aspects, Sánchez-Romero C, Editor. Springer: Switzerland. 2024, 217-238.
- Sharmin R, Rasul M, Rahman M, Hossain M, Hasan M. In vitro selection of rice somaclonal variants for salt tolerance: in vitro selection for salt tolerance rice. Bangladesh J. Agric. 2024, 49(2): 16-30.
- Wang N, Yu Y, Zhang D, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Xun H, Li G, Liu B, Zhang J. Modification of gene expression, DNA methylation and small RNAs expression in rice plants under in vitro culture. Agronomy 2022, 12(7): 1675.
- 3Hou B-H, Tsai Y-H, Chiang M-H, Tsao S-M, Huang S-H, Chao C-P, Chen H-M. Cultivar-specific markers, mutations, and chimerisim of Cavendish banana somaclonal variants resistant to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4. BMC Gen. 2022, 23(1): 1-7.
- Sianipar N, Assidqi K, So I, Maulidha A, Asikin Y. Somaclonal variations induced by benzylaminopurine to enhance the fruit morphology of horn banana. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet 2024, 56(5): 2045-2055.
- Anuradha C, Ramajayam D, Mayilvaganan M, Backiyarani S, Mol P P, Mailraja V, Singh A, Uma S. Molecular characterization of Red banana and its somaclonal variant: a comprehensive study. 3 Biotech 2024, 14(1): 1-19.
- Adly W M, Niedbała G, El-Denary M E, Mohamed M A, Piekutowska M, Wojciechowski T, Abd El-Salam E-S T, Fouad A S. Somaclonal variation for genetic improvement of starch accumulation in potato (Solanum tuberosum) tubers. Plants 2023, 12(2): 1-12.
- 3Bayati E, Gomarian M, Mirzaie-Nodousha H, Changizi M, Khaghani S. Producing a superior genotype from agria potato cultivar using somaclonal variation. Rev. Cient. 2021, 34(02): 671-681.
- 3Mohamed R R. Molecular studies and soma-clonal variations in some potato genotypes. Ann. Agric. Sci. Moshtohor 2021, 59(5): 503-510.
- 3Ciobanu R. Variability of biomorphological and quantitative characteristics of SC1 somaclones of triticale induced by gamma rays and in vitro culture. Biotehnol. Avanc. Realiz. Perspect. 2022, 1(1): 47-49.
- 3Wijerathna-Yapa A, Ramtekey V, Ranawaka B, Basnet B R. Applications of in vitro tissue culture technologies in breeding and genetic improvement of wheat. Plants 2022, 11(17): 1-12.
- 3Birsin M A. in Advances in Wheat Breeding: Towards Climate Resilience and Nutrient Security, Zencirci N, Altay F, Baloch F, Azhar Nadeem M, and Ludidi N, Editors. Springer: Singapore. 2024, 573-596.
- Ismail H, Montaser N T, Mohammed M, Nassar A. Signatures of osmotic stress-responsive genes in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) somaclonal variant cells. Egyptian J. Pure Appl. Sci. 2022, 60(2): 1-13.
- 4Paladi D, Cotenco E, Siromyatnikov I. Biomorphological and quantitative characteristics of tomato SC0 somaclones. Biotehnol. Avanc. Realiz Perspect. 2022, 1(1): 325-327.
- Shaunak I, Sharma R, Sharma P, Gupta M, Bhardwaj R K. Developing resistance against soil-borne Fusarium pathogen causing tomato wilt through in vitro cell line selection. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2023, 153(1): 91-104.
- Orłowska R. Barley somatic embryogenesis-an attempt to modify variation induced in tissue culture. J. Biol. Res.-Thessaloniki 2021, 28(1): 1-12.
- Shupletsova O N, Lisitsyn E M, Shchennikova I N. Modification in amino acid profiles of barley and oat leaves during somaclonal breeding for abiotic resistance. Mod. Phytomorphol. 2022, 16(1): 1-7.
- Orłowska R, Dynkowska W M, Niedziela A, Zebrowski J, Zimny J, Androsiuk P, Bednarek P T. β-glucans, SAM, and GSH fluctuations in barley anther tissue culture conditions affect regenerants’ DNA methylation and GPRE. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24(1): 1-13.
- Kaewkam A, Limsanguan P, Chansuthep S, Chanprame S, Chanprame S. The establishment of solid mutant line from somaclonal variation generated through mature petal cultures of chrysanthemum. Int. J Agric. Techn. 2022, 18(3): 1013-1032.
- Ali S, Raza S, Shahzad S, Batool T S, Abdullah A, Hameed N, Manzoor A. Regeneration of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) via somatic embryogenesis and screening of clones for agronomic traits. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2023, 153(3): 657-667.
- Eisa E A, Tilly-Mándy A, Honfi P, Shala A Y, Gururani M A. Chrysanthemum: A comprehensive review on recent developments on in vitro regeneration. Biology 2022, 11(12): 1-17.
- Mishra N, Tripathi M K, Tiwari S, Tripathi N, Sapre S, Ahuja A, Tiwari S. Cell suspension culture and in vitro screening for drought tolerance in soybean using polyethylene glycol. Plants 2021, 10(3): 1-17.
- Upadhyay S, Singh A, Tripathi M, Tiwari S, Tripathi N, Patel R. In vitro selection for resistance against charcoal rot disease of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. Leg. Res.-An Int. J. 2023, 46(5): 640-646.
- Kiruba G, Sumithra V, Prasannakumari M, Shanmugam A, Arulmozhi R, Rajendran R A, Pushpa R. in Soybean Production Technology: Physiology, Production and Processing, Krishna Pratap Singh N K and Singh A T, Editors. Springer: Singapore. 2025, 229-255.
- Obara J A, Mulwa R, Oyoo M, Karwitha M. Somatic embryogenesis and optimization of regeneration system from immature embryos in maize inbred lines. Res. Biotechnol 2022, 13(1): 1-10.
- Kausch A P, Nelson-Vasilchik K, Tilelli M, Hague J P. Maize tissue culture, transformation, and genome editing. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2021, 57(4): 653-671.
- Moemi B, Masanga J, Runo S. An optimized protocol for in vitro regeneration of tropical maize inbred lines through cell suspension and semi-protoplast cultures. African J. Biotechnol. 2023, 22(10): 223-234.
- Pérez G, Yanes-Paz E, Isidrón M, Lorenzo J C. Phenotypic and AFLP characterization of two new pineapple somaclones derived from in vitro culture. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2009, 96(1): 113-116.
- Pérez G, Mbogholi A, Sagarra F, Aragón C, González J, Isidrón M, Lorenzo J C. Morphological and physiological characterization of two new pineapple somaclones derived from in vitro culture. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 2011, 3(1): 1-14. DOI: 10.1007/s11627-011-9342-y.
- Pérez G, Yanes-Paz E, Mbogholi A, Valle B, Sagarra F, Yabor L, Aragón C, González J, Isidrón M, Lorenzo J C. New pineapple somaclonal variants: P3R5 and Dwarf. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2012, 3(1): 1-11.
- Sapak Z, Nusaibah S A. in Advances in Tropical Crop Protection, Wong M-Y, Editor. Springer: Switzerland. 2024, 85-104.
- Mohd Anuar I S, Nusaibah S A, Sapak Z. Economically imperative Ananas comosus diseases, status, and its control measures documented in producing countries. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2024, 47(2): 307-322.
- Mehraj M, Das S, Feroz F, Waheed Wani A, Dar S, Kumar S, Wani A K, Farid A. Nutritional composition and therapeutic potential of pineapple peel–a comprehensive review. Chem. Bio. 2024, 21(5): 1-15.