References
- Östling J. Humboldt and the Modern German University. Lund University Press; 2018.
- Secord JA. HOW SCIENTIFIC CONVERSATION BECAME SHOP TALK. Trans R Hist Soc 2007; 17: 129-156.
- Liu L, Feigin V, Sacco RL, Koroshetz WJ. Promoting global collaboration for brain health research. BMJ 2020: m3753.
- Ergoren MC, Manara E, Paolacci S, et al. The Biennial report: The collaboration between MAGI Research, Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Genetic and Rare Diseases and Near East University DESAM Institute. Eurobiotech J 2020; 4(4): 167-170.
- Wool LE. Knowledge across networks: how to build a global neuroscience collaboration. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2020;65:100-107.
- Binz-Scharf MC, Kalish Y, Paik L. Making Science. American Behavioral Scientist 2015; 59(5): 531-547.
- Hall KL, Vogel AL, Huang GC, et al. The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. American Psychologist 2018; 73(4): 532-548.
- Salazar Miranda A, Claudel M. Spatial proximity matters: A study on collaboration. PLoS One 2021; 16(12): e0259965.
- Brucks MS, Levav J. Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation. Nature 2022; 605(7908): 108-112.
- Horváth TL, Hirsch J, Molnár Z. Body, Brain, Behavior Three Views and a Conversation. Academic Press 2022.
- Brown RE. The importance of collaboration in neuroscience. Brain 2023; 146(2): 789-790.
- Dey S, Sharma P. Lack of effective intercultural communication is hobbling academia — fix it for research equity. Nature 2024; 629(8013): 757-757.
- Somsen G. The princess at the conference: Science, pacifism, and Habsburg society. Hist Sci 2021; 59(4): 434-460.
- Mazanik A. Arbovirology and Cold War Collaborations: A Transnational History of the Tick-borne Encephalitis Vaccine, 1930-1980. J Hist Med Allied Sci 2023.
- Nicogossian A, Campbell MR. The Legacy of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2023; 94(8): 651-653.
- Li L, Wang K, Chen Z, Koplan JP. US-China health exchange and collaboration following COVID-19. Lancet 2021; 397(10291): 2304-2308.
- Research collaborations bring big rewards: the world needs more. Nature 2021; 594(7863): 301-302.
- Zhang D, Ding W, Wang Y, Liu S. Exploring the Role of International Research Collaboration in Building China’s World-Class Universities. Sustainability 2022; 14(6): 3487.
- Mitchell Crow J. US-China partnerships bring strength in numbers to big science projects. Nature 2022; 603(7900): S6-S8.
- Fry C V, Cai X, Zhang Y, Wagner CS. Consolidation in a crisis: Patterns of international collaboration in early COVID-19 research. PLoS One 2020; 15(7): e0236307.
- Aileni M, Rohela GK, Jogam P, Soujanya S, Zhang B. Biotechnological Perspectives to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic: Precise Diagnostics and Inevitable Vaccine Paradigms. Cells 2022; 11(7): 1182.
- Rezaei N. COVID-19 and Medical Biotechnology. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol 2020; 12(3): 139.
- Gartland KMA, Gartland JS. Opportunities in biotechnology. J Biotechnol 2018; 282: 38-45.
- Iglič H, Doreian P, Kronegger L, Ferligoj A. With whom do researchers collaborate and why? Scientometrics 2017; 112(1): 153-174.
- Egelie KJ, Lie HT, Grimpe C, Sørheim R. Access and openness in biotechnology research collaborations between universities and industry. Nat Biotechnol 2019; 37(12): 1413-1419.
- de Chadarevian S. Human population studies and the World Health Organization. Dynamis 2015; 35(2): 359-388.
- Medori MC, Donato K, Stuppia L, et al. Author Correction: Achievement of sustainable development goals through the Mediterranean diet. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2024; 28(6): 2628.
- Donato K, Medori MC, Stuppia L, et al. Unleashing the potential of biotechnology for sustainable development. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2023; 27(6 Suppl): 100-113.
- Science in times of conflict. Nat Metab 2022; 4(4): 405-405.
- Fink CG. SCIENTIFIC MEETINGS IN WAR TIMES. Science (1979) 1917; 45(1174): 661-661.
- McGrath P, Penca J, Ghribi M. Scientists in times of war. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326405817_ Scientists_in_times_of_war.
- Andenas M, Andersen Baasch C. Theory and Practice of Harmonisation. (Andenas M, Andersen Baasch C, eds.). Edward Eldgar Publishing 2012.
- Mandrinos S, Lim WM, Liew CSL. De‐internationalization through the lens of intellectual property rights. Thunderbird International Business Review 2022; 64(1): 13-24.
- McDonald A. Scientific cooperation as a bridge across the Cold War divide: the case of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998; 866: 55-83.
- Bruschi F, Dundar M, Gahan PB, et al. Biotechnology worldwide and the “European Biotechnology Thematic Network” Association (EBTNA). Curr Opin Biotechnol 2011; 22 Suppl 1: S7-14.
- Bonetti G, Donato K, Medori MC, et al. Human Cloning: Biology, Ethics, and Social Implications. Clin Ter 2023; 174(Suppl 2(6)): 230-235.
- Kiani AK, Pheby D, Henehan G, et al. Ethical considerations regarding animal experimentation. J Prev Med Hyg 2022; 63(2 Suppl 3): E255-E266.
- Medori MC, Bonetti G, Donato K, et al. Bioetics Issues of Artificial Placenta and Artificial Womb Technology. Clin Ter 2023; 174(Suppl 2(6)): 243-248.
- da Silva CFA, Virgüez E, Eker S, et al. The future of scientific societies. Science (1979) 2023; 380(6640): 30-32.
- Primus C, Zimmerman AN, Terovolas AK, et al. Scientific Societies Fostering Inclusivity in the Life Sciences Through Engagement of Undergraduate Scientists. Front Educ (Lausanne) 2022; 7.