Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The ethical correctness of a psychologist’s conduct toward people participating in research in accordance with the “ethics of social consequences” Cover

The ethical correctness of a psychologist’s conduct toward people participating in research in accordance with the “ethics of social consequences”

Open Access
|Jul 2026

Figures & Tables

Actions according to the “ethics of social consequences”; based on the book by Vasil Gluchman, Ethics of Social Consequences, trans_ Przemysław Kroczek_ ISMiE Publishing House “Humanum”, Warsaw 2012; in: Dubiel-Zielińska, P_ (2019): Ethical concepts and their application to the construction of the theory of education_ Oświęcim: MUP Publishing, pp_ 242–243_

Assessment of complex procedure
Assessment of simple procedureAssessment of appropriateness of action in terms of the intentions (likely or expected consequences)Assessment of the fairness of the act (conformity of the actual consequences with the expected ones)
Assessment of the act in terms of the consequencesConsequences for societyIntentions
Morally (useful: more useful) obligatory, requiredMaximum predominance of positive effects over negative onesGoodAppropriateFair
Right (useful: less useful), obligatory, requiredDefinite, but not maximum, predominance of positive effects over negative onesGoodAppropriateFair
Right (useful: more useful)Maximum predominance of positive effects over negative onesBadShould be avoidedNeither fair nor unfair, but not condemnable
Wrong (useless, or more or less harmful – depending on the number of negative effects)Maximum or almost maximal predominance of negative effects over positive ones (or exclusive presence of negative effects)GoodAppropriate (if the subject has sufficient knowledge of the circumstances of the action) or one that should be avoided (if the subject relies only on good intentions and does not appreciate the role of knowledge and analysis)Neither fair nor unfair, but not worthy of condemnation
Wrong (useful: less useful), prohibitedDefinite, but not maximum, predominance of positive effects over negative onesBadShould be avoidedUnfair, but not condemnable
Wrong (useless, or more or less harmful – depending on the number of negative effects), prohibitedDefinite, but not maximum, predominance of negative effects over positive onesBadShould be avoidedUnfair, condemnable
Immoral (useless, or more or less harmful – depending on the amount of negative effects), prohibitedA predominance of negative effects over positive (or the exclusive presence of negative effects)BadShould be avoidedUnfair, condemnable
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2026-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2453-7829 | Journal ISSN: 1338-5615
Language: English
Page range: 216 - 227
Published on: Jul 6, 2026
Published by: University of Prešov
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Paulina Dubiel-Zielińska, published by University of Prešov
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.