Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Defining human-animal chimeras and hybrids: A comparison of legal systems and natural sciences Cover

Defining human-animal chimeras and hybrids: A comparison of legal systems and natural sciences

By: Szymon Bokota  
Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. BARTOSZEWICZ, M. (2018): Definicje legalne w świetle określoności prawa [Legal definitions in the light of the specificity of the law]. In: R. Balicki & M. Jabłoński (eds.): Dookoła Wojtek… Księga pamiątkowa poświęcona Doktorowi Arturowi Wojciechowi Preisnerowi [Around Wojtek… Commemorative Book dedicated to Doctor Artur Wojciech Preisner]. Wrocław: E-Wydawnictwo. Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa. Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, pp. 355–364.
  2. BEYLEVELD, D., FINNEGAN, T. & PATTINSON, S. D. (2009): The regulation of hybrids and chimeras in the UK. In: J. Taupnitz & M. Weschka (eds): CHIMBIRDS: Chimeras and Hybrids in Comparative European and International Research. Berlin: Springer, pp. 645–666.
  3. BIELSKA-BRODZIAK, A. (2008): Kłopoty z definicjami legalnymi [Problems with legal definitions]. In: O. Bogucki & S. Czepita (eds): System prawny a porządek prawny [Legal system and legal order]. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, pp. 159–174.
  4. BIELSKA-BRODZIAK, A. (2017): Śladami prawodawcy faktycznego. Materiały legislacyjne jako narzędzie wykładni prawa [In the footsteps of factual legislator: Legislative materials as tool of law interpretation]. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwers.
  5. BOKLAGE, C. E. (2006): Embryogenesis of chimeras, twins and anterior midline asymmetries. In: Human Reproduction, 21(3), pp. 579–591.10.1093/humrep/dei370
  6. BONNICKSEN, A. M. (2009): Chimeras, hybrids and interspecies research: Politics and policymaking. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.10.1353/book13044
  7. BOURRET, R., MARTINEZ, E., VIALLA, F., GIQUEL, C., THONAT-MARIN, A. & DE VOS, J. (2016): Human–animal chimeras: ethical issues about farming chimeric animals bearing human organs. In: Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 7, pp. 1–7.10.1186/s13287-016-0345-9
  8. DE LOS ANGELES, A., PHO, N. & REDMOND Jr., D. E. et al. (2018): Generating human organs via interspecies chimera formation: Advances and barriers. In: Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 91, pp. 333–342.
  9. GRAVES, R. (2017): The Greek myths. London: Penguin.
  10. GREELY, H. T. (2003): Defining chimeras...and chimeric concerns. In: The American Journal of Bioethics, 3(3), pp. 17–20.10.1162/15265160360706444
  11. HAAS, B. J., GEVERS, D., EARL A. M., FELDGARDEN, M., WARD, D. V., GIANNOUKOS, G., CIULLA, D. M., TABBAA, D., HIGHLANDER, S., SODERGREN, E., METHE, B., DESANTIS T. Z., PETROSINO, J. F., KNIGHT, R. & BIRREN, B. (2011): Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. In: Genome Research, 21, pp. 494–504.10.1101/gr.112730.110
  12. HANAHAN, D., WAGNER, E. F. & PALMITER, R. D. (2007): The origins of oncomice: a history of the first transgenic mice genetically engineered to develop cancer. In: Genes & Development, 21, pp. 2258–2270.10.1101/gad.1583307
  13. HUNTINGTON, C. (1936): A note on legal definitions. In: Columbia Law Review, 36(7), pp. 1099–1106.10.2307/1117047
  14. HUTHER, C. (2009): Chimeras: The ethics of creating human-animal interspecifics. München: Electronic Theses of LMU Munich.
  15. JACKSON, K. T. (1985): Definition in legal reasoning. In: Jurimetrics, 25(4) pp. 377–386.
  16. KOPLIN, J. J. & SAVULESCU, J. (2019): Time to rethink the law on part-human chimeras. In: Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 6(1), pp. 37–50.10.1093/jlb/lsz005
  17. KUŘE, J. (2009): Etymological background and further clarifying remarks concerning chimeras and hybrids. In: J. Taupnitz & M. Weschka (eds.): CHIMBIRDS: Chimeras and hybrids in comparative European and international research. Berlin: Springer, pp. 7–21.10.1007/978-3-540-93869-9_3
  18. KWISDA, K., WHITE, L. & HÜBNER, D. (2020): Ethical arguments concerning human-animal chimera research: A systematic review. In: BMC Medical Ethics, 21, pp. 1–8.10.1186/s12910-020-00465-7
  19. LEVINE, S. & GRABEL, L. (2017): The contribution of human/non-human animal chimeras to stem cell research. In: Stem Cell Research 24, pp.128–134.10.1016/j.scr.2017.09.005
  20. MACAGNO, F. (2010): Definitions in law. In: Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée, 2, pp. 199–217.
  21. MALINOWSKI, A. (2005): Definicje legalne w prawie polskim [Legal definitions in Polish law]. In: Studia Iuridica, 44, pp. 214–240.
  22. OPAŁEK, K. & WRÓBLEWSKI, J. (1969): Zagadnienia teorii prawa [Issues of legal theory]. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  23. PIETRZYKOWSKI, T. (2018): Personhood beyond humanism: Animals, chimeras, autonomous agents and the law. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-78881-4
  24. PORSDAM, S., SUN, R. & HERMERÉN, G. (2019): A framework for the ethical assessment of chimeric animal research involving human neural tissue. In: BMC Medical Ethics, 20, pp. 1–9.10.1186/s12910-019-0345-2
  25. ROBERTS, N. (1960): A chimera is a chimera: A medieval tautology. In: Journal of the History of Ideas, 21(2), pp. 273–284.10.2307/2708200
  26. SAŁUGA, P. (2008): Sposoby wyodrębniania definicji legalnych [Methods of isolating legal definitions]. In: Państwo i prawo, 5, pp. 76–86.
  27. SHI, L., LUO, X., JIANG, J., CHEN, Y., LIU, C., HU, T., LI, M., LIN, Q., LI, Y., HUANG, J., WANG, H., NIU, Y., SHI, Y., STYNER, M., WANG, J., LU, Y., SUN, X., YU, H., JI, W. & SU, B. (2019): Transgenic rhesus monkeys carrying the human MCPH1 gene copies show human-like neoteny of brain development. In: National Science Review, 6(3), pp. 480–493.10.1093/nsr/nwz043
  28. SOBOLEV, A. (2015): Legal terminology from the rhetorical perspective: Legal genres approach. In: Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly economiki, 3, pp. 168–180.
  29. SOLAN, L. M. (2001): Why laws work pretty well, but not great: Words and rules. In: Law & Social Inquiry, 26(1), pp. 243–270.10.1111/j.1747-4469.2001.tb00177.x
  30. SYKES, M. (2001): Mixed chimerism and transplant tolerance. In: Immunity, 417, pp. 417–424.10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00122-4
  31. TAUPNITZ, J. (2009): Summary, conclusions and recommendations: Legal aspects. In: J. Taupnitz, M & Weschka (eds.): CHIMBIRDS: Chimeras and hybrids in comparative European and international research. Berlin: Springer, pp. 433–458.10.1007/978-3-540-93869-9_22
  32. WALSH, N. C, KENNEY, L. L., JANGWALE, S., ARYEE, K. E., GREINER, D. L., BREHM, M. A. & SCHULZ, L. D. (2017): Humanized mouse models of clinical disease. In: Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, 12, pp. 187–215.10.1146/annurev-pathol-052016-100332
  33. WESCHKA, M. (2009): Examples of inter-species mixtures aa. Xenotransplantation. In: J. Taupnitz & M. Weschka (eds.): CHIMBIRDS: Chimeras and hybrids in comparative European and international research. Berlin: Springer, pp. 35–39.
  34. ZIELIŃSKI, M. (2012): Wykładnia prawa: zasady, reguły, wskazówki [Interpretation of law: Principles, rules, advices]. Warszawa: Wolter Kluwers.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2021-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2453-7829 | Journal ISSN: 1338-5615
Language: English
Page range: 101 - 114
Published on: Jun 4, 2021
Published by: University of Prešov
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Szymon Bokota, published by University of Prešov
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.