Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla Using the OT Bridge Equator System: A Case Report Cover

Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla Using the OT Bridge Equator System: A Case Report

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Escobar GAA, Cartagena FJR, de González WYE, et al. Edentulism and quality of life in the Salvadoran population: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:928.
  2. Koshino H, Hirai T, Yokoyama Y, Tanaka T, Kozono Y, Toyoda M. Palatal coverage and gustatory senses. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100(3):195–202.
  3. Mo A, Hjortsjö C, Jokstad A. Maxillary overdenture on three implants retained by low-profile stud attachments: a prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(12):7273–7283.
  4. Kutkut A, Bertoli E, Monaco EA, Chen C. A systematic review comparing conventional complete denture and implant-retained overdenture. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(3):201–9.
  5. Bouhy A, Lamy M, Altaep Y, Lambert F. Maxillary implant overdenture retained by four unsplinted attachments and opposed by a natural or fixed dentition: Five-year clinical outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;34(4):285–296.
  6. Slot W, Raghoebar GM, Cune MS, Vissink A, Meijer HJA. Maxillary overdentures supported by four or six implants in the anterior region: 10-year randomized controlled trial results. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(5):543–551.
  7. Elsyad MA, Elhaddad AA, Khirallah AS. Retentive properties of O-ring and locator attachments for implant-retained maxillary overdentures. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(6):457–63.
  8. Kleis WK, Kämmerer PW, Hartmann S, Al-Nawas B, Wagner W. A comparison of three types of attachment systems for mandibular implant overdentures. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(10):790–8.
  9. Ameen NM, El-Khodary NM, Abdel-Hamid AM, Fahmy AE. A comparative study to evaluate microstrain of lowprofile attachment associated with and without bar connection in implant-assisted mandibular overdenture (in vitro study). Egypt Dent J. 2024;70(1):1–10.
  10. Zhurakivska K, Ciacci N, Troiano G, Caponio VCA, Scrascia R, Pallecchi L, et al. Nitride-coated and anodicoxidized titanium promote a higher fibroblast and reduced Streptococcus gordonii proliferation compared to the uncoated titanium. Prosthesis. 2020;2:333–9.
  11. Del Castillo R, Chochlidakis K, Galindo-Moreno P, Ercoli C. Titanium nitride coated implant abutments: from technical aspects and soft tissue biocompatibility to clinical applications. A literature review. J Prosthodont. 2022;31(7):571–8.
  12. Camargo SEA, et al. Novel coatings to minimize bacterial adhesion and promote osteoblast activity for titanium implants. J Funct Biomater. 2020;11(2):42.
  13. Pellegrino G, Zaccheroni Z, Checchi V, Lizio G. Benefits of a snap-joint system in an immediate full-arch maxillary fixed rehabilitation on disparallel implants. Explor Med. 2024;5:887–95.
  14. Scrascia R, Cicciù M, Manco C, Miccoli A, Cervino G. Angled screwdriver solutions and low-profile attachments in full arch rehabilitation with divergent implants. Appl Sci. 2021;11:1122.
  15. Montanari M, Jeong SB, Cervino G, Milone D, Santonocito D, Risitano G. Finite element analysis of OT Bridge fixed prosthesis system: stress distribution and biomechanical behavior. Procedia Struct Integr. 2021;33:734–47.
  16. Mohamed SIS, Alattar SI, Bakry AA, Ouda SLM. OT Bridge prosthetic system with different number of screws in all on six maxillary prosthesis: finite element analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25:833.
  17. Peitsinis PR, Blouchou A, Chatzopoulos GS, Vouros ID. Optimizing implant placement timing and loading protocols for successful functional and esthetic outcomes: a narrative literature review. J Clin Med. 2025;14(5):1442.
  18. Pozzan MC, Grande F, Mochi Zamperoli E, Tesini F, Carossa M, Catapano S, et al. Assessment of preload loss after cyclic loading in the OT Bridge system in an “All on Four” rehabilitation model in the absence of one and two prosthesis screws. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(4):1582.
  19. Acampora R, Montanari M, Scrascia R, Ferrari E, Pasi M, Cervino G, et al. 1-year evaluation of OT Bridge abutments for immediately loaded maxillary fixed restorations: a multicenter study. Eur J Dent. 2021;15(2):290–4.
  20. Gomaa A, Dehis W, Mohamad O, Ali E, Khalil D. Radiographic evaluation of crestal bone loss around implants in mandibular all on 4 implant hybrid prosthesis using 2 different abutments (multi-unit versus OT Bridge). Egypt Dent J. 2024;70(4):3549–59.
  21. Tallarico M, Fiorillo L, Montanari M, Scrascia R, Cristache CM, Ferrari E, et al. One-year multicenter randomised controlled trial comparing OT Equator® and locator attachments to retain an early loaded implant overdenture on two implants. Int J Biomater. 2023;2023:2745262.
  22. Montanari M, Scrascia R, Cervino G, Pasi M, Ferrari E, Xhanari E, et al. A one-year, multicenter, retrospective evaluation of narrow and low-profile abutments used to rehabilitate complete edentulous lower arches: the OT Bridge concept. J Prosthodont. 2020;29:352–61.
  23. Tallarico M, Scrascia R, Annucci M, Meloni SM, Lumbau AI, Koshovari A, et al. Errors in implant positioning due to lack of planning: a clinical case report of new prosthetic materials and solutions. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(8):1883.
  24. Stefanelli LV, Mandelaris GA, Franchina A, Di Nardo D, Galli M, et al. Accuracy evaluation of 14 maxillary full arch implant treatments performed with Da Vinci Bridge: a case series. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(12):2806.
  25. Cervino G, Cicciù M, Fedi S, Milone D, Fiorillo L, et al. FEM analysis applied to OT Bridge abutment with Seeger retention system. Eur J Dent. 2021;15(1):47–53.
  26. Catapano S, Ferrari M, Mobilio N, Montanari M, Corsalini M, Grande F. Comparative analysis of the stability of prosthetic screws under cyclic loading in implant prosthodontics: an in vitro study. Appl Sci. 2021;11:622.
  27. Grande F, Pozzan MC, Marconato R, Mollica F, Catapano S, et al. Evaluation of load distribution in a mandibular model with four implants depending on the number of prosthetic screws used for OT-Bridge system: a finite element analysis. Materials. 2022;15:7963.
  28. Grande F, Cesare PM, Mochi Zamperoli E, Gianoli CM, Mollica F, Catapano S. Evaluation of tension and deformation in a mandibular Toronto bridge anchored on three fixtures using different framework materials, abutment systems, and loading conditions: a FEM analysis. Eur J Dent. 2023;17(4):1097–105.
  29. Martinolli M, Bortolini S, Natali A, Pereira LJ, Castelo PM, Rodrigues Garcia RCM, et al. Long-term survival analysis of standard-length and short implants with multifunctional abutments. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46(7):640–6.
  30. Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):22–38.
  31. Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012;91(3):242–248.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eabr-2026-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2956-2090 | Journal ISSN: 2956-0454
Language: English
Page range: 91 - 98
Submitted on: Jan 19, 2026
Accepted on: Mar 3, 2026
Published on: Jun 1, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Zaklina Rajkovic, Milica Jovanovic, Andjela Milojevic Samanovic, Sonja Milosavljevic, Vladan Radisavljevic, Marko Milosavljevic, published by University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Medical Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.