Making Students “Safe” Writers with the SAFE Model in the Age of AI
References
- Abed, T. B. (2024). Implementing the process writing approach to teach paragraph writing at Birzeit University. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(1), 24—34. DOI: 10.17507/jltr.1501.04.
- Akinwande, M., Adeliyi, O., & Yussuph, T. (2024). Decoding AI and human authorship: Nuances revealed through NLP and statistical analysis. International Journal on Cybernetics & Informatics (IJCI), 13(4), 85—103. DOI: 10.5121/ijci.2024.130408.
- AlAfnan, M. A., & MohdZuki, S. F. (2023). Do artificial intelligence chatbots have a writing style? An investigation into the stylistic features of ChatGPT -4. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(3), 85—94. DOI: 10.37965/jait.2023.0267.
- Alexander, K., Savvidou, C., & Alexander, C. (2023). Who wrote this essay? Detecting AI -generated writing in second language education in higher education. Teaching English With Technology, 23(2), 25—43. DOI: 10.56297/BUKA4060/XHLD5365.
- Alt, D., & Kapshuk, Y. (2022). Argumentation -based learning with digital concept mapping and college students’ epistemic beliefs. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 687—706. DOI: 10.1007/s10984-021-09385-8.
- Anshori, D. S. (2023). Genre bahasa media: Literasi bahasa di panggung media [Media language genres: Language literacy in the media sphere]. PT Refika Aditama.
- Arseven, T., & Bal, M. (2025). Critical literacy in artificial intelligence assisted writing instruction: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 57, 101850. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101850.
- Aydin, O., Karaarslan, E., Erenay, F. S., & Bacanin, N. (2025). Generative AI in academic writing: A comparison of DeepSeek, Qwen, ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, and Gemma. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2503.04765. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.04765.
- Bouziane, K., & Bouziane, A. (2024). AI versus human effectiveness in essay evaluation. Discover Education, 3(1), 201. DOI: 10.1007/s44217-024-00320-6.
- Budiharso, T. (2017). Developing prompts of argumentative essay writing for EFL college students. Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics, 2(3), 227—244. DOI: 10.30957/ijoltl.v2i3.531.
- Cardon, P., Fleischmann, C., Aritz, J., Logemann, M., & Heidewald, J. (2023). The challenges and opportunities of AI -assisted writing: Developing AI literacy for the AI age. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 86(3), 257—295. DOI: 10.1177/23294906231176517.
- Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293—321. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20216.
- Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. D. (2007). Personally -seeded discussions to scaffold online argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 253— 277. DOI: 10.1080/09500690600560944.
- Coe, M., Hanita, M., Nishioka, V., & Smiley, R. (2011). An investigation of the impact of the 6 + 1 trait writing model on grade 5 student writing achievement. Final report. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
- Coffin, C., Curry, M., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Swann, J. (2003). Teaching academic writing: A toolkit for higher education. Routledge.
- Črček, N., & Patekar, J. (2023). Writing with AI: University students’ use of ChatGPT. Journal of Language & Education, 9(4), 128—138. DOI: 10.17323/ jle.2023.17379.
- Culham, R. (2003). 6 + 1 traits of writing: The complete guide grades 3 and up. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
- Deep, P. Das, & Chen, Y. (2025). The role of AI in academic writing: Impacts on writing skills, critical thinking, and integrity in higher education. Societies, 15(9), 1—19. DOI: 10.3390/soc15090247.
- Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365—387. DOI: 10.2307/356600.
- Guo, K., Zhang, E. Di, Li, D., & Yu, S. (2025). Using AI -supported peer review to enhance feedback literacy: An investigation of students’ revision of feedback on peers’ essays. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(4), 1612—1639. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13540.
- Hinton, M., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2022). How persuasive is AI -generated argumentation? An analysis of the quality of an argumentative text produced by the GPT -3 AI text generator. Argument & Computation, 14(1), 59—74. DOI: 10.3233/AAC-210026.
- Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
- Hysaj, A., Freeman, M., & Hamam, D. (2024). Using AI tools to enhance academic writing and maintain academic integrity. In: A. Coman, S. Vasilache (Eds.), Social Computing and Social Media. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 57—66), vol 14704. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031--61305-0_4.
- Jiang, F. (Kevin), & Hyland, K. (2025). Does ChatGPT argue like students? Bundles in argumentative essays. Applied Linguistics, 46(3), 375—391. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amae052.
- Kalsum (2020). The 6+1 trait writing model to build up students’ writing. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development, 4(1), 23—30. DOI: 10.31605/eduvelop.v4i1.799.
- Khampusaen, D. (2025). The impact of ChatGPT on academic writing skills and knowledge: An investigation of its use in argumentative essays. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 18(1), 963—988. DOI: 10.70730/PGCQ9242.
- Lehman, I. M. (2026). Voice and identity negotiation in academic publishing: A writing pedagogy for EAL doctoral students. TESOL Quarterly. DOI: 10.1002/ tesq.70065.
- Lehman, I. M., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2021). Representation of voice in English essays of non -native students of business. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 168—181. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2020.1712221.
- Li, M., & Wilson, J. (2025). AI -integrated scaffolding to enhance agency and creativity in K -12 English language learners: A systematic review. Information, 16(7), 519. DOI: 10.3390/info16070519.
- Macagno, F. (2021). Argumentation schemes in AI: A literature review. Introduction to the special issue. Argument & Computation, 12(3), 287—302. DOI: 10.3233/AAC-210020.
- Mammadova, T. (2023). Academic writing and information literacy instruction in digital environments: A complementary approach. In: Academic Writing and Information Literacy Instruction in Digital Environments: A Complementary Approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Mezzadri, M., & Paita, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in language education: Exploring prompting strategies to foster argumentative writing skills. Journal of Studies in Language, Culture and Society (JSLCS), 8(1), 188—205.
- Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1—13. DOI: 10.1177/1609406917733847.
- Patthey‑Chavez, G. G., Matsumura, L. C., & Valdés, R. (2004). Investigating the process approach to writing instruction in urban middle schools. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(6), 462—476.
- Qoura, A. A., & Zahran, F. A. (2018). The effect of the 6+1 trait writing model on ESP university students critical thinking and writing achievement. English Language Teaching, 11(9), 68—79. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v11n9p68.
- Ranade, N., Saravia, M., & Johri, A. (2025). Using rhetorical strategies to design prompts: A human -in -the -loop approach to make AI useful. AI & SOCIETY, 40(2), 711—732. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01905-3.
- Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023). Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Critical Care, 27(1), 75. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023--04380-2.
- Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2008). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448—484. DOI: 10.1002/ sce.20306.
- Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument -Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217—257. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20421.
- Spandel, V. (1997). Dear parent: A handbook for parents of 6 ‑trait writing students. Northwest Regional Educational Lab.
- Stofiana, T., Sunendar, D., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2025). Writing with AI, thinking with Toulmin: metacognitive gaps and the rhetorical limits of argumentation. Ampersand, 15, 100242. DOI: 10.1016/j.amper.2025.100242.
- Sułkowski, Ł., Chidlow, A. A., & Lehman, I. M. (2025). Language and generative AI: A new paradigm of organizational research. Discourses on Culture, 24(1), 19—43. DOI: 10.2478/doc-2025-0012.
- Tardy, C. M. (2016). Beyond convention: Genre innovation in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.
- Tseng, W., & Warschauer, M. (2023). AI -writing tools in education: If you can’t beat them, join them. Journal of China Computer ‑Assisted Language Learning, 3(2), 258—262. DOI: 10.1515/jccall-2023-0008.
- Un‑udom, S. (2020). Effects of the 6+1 traits of writing model on Thai EFL students’ writing achievement. Journal of Research and Development Institute, Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University, 7(1), 241—254.
- Vassiliades, A., Bassiliades, N., & Patkos, T. (2021). Argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence: A survey. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 36(e5), 1—35. DOI: 10.1017/S0269888921000011.
- Wang, C., & Wang, Z. (2025). Investigating L2 writers’ critical AI literacy in AI -assisted writing: An APSE model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 67, 101187. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101187.
- Werkmeister, B. E. (2010). Evaluation of 6+1 trait writing and the professional development training used to implement the program. Lindenwood University.
- Williams, J. D. (2014). Preparing to teach writing: Research, theory, and practice (4th ed.). Routledge.
- Willis, R. K., & Harvey, S. (2025). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in applied linguistics research: A field -specific guide. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4(3), 100279. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100279.
- Yang, A. (2025). Generative AI chatbots: The future of grammar and spelling correction in English learning. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 26(22), 72—87. DOI: 10.1504/IJICT.2025.146909.
- Zhao, D. (2025). The impact of AI -enhanced natural language processing tools on writing proficiency: an analysis of language precision, content summarization, and creative writing facilitation. Education and Information Technologies, 30(6), 8055—8086. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-024-13145-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/doc-2026-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2450-0402
Language: English
Page range: 189 - 220
Submitted on: Jan 16, 2026
Accepted on: Feb 8, 2026
Published on: Jul 3, 2026
Published by: SAN University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Rahmad Nuthihar, Dadang S. Anshori, Isah Cahyani, Andoyo Sastromiharjo, published by SAN University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.