References
- Béland, D. (2019). How ideas and institutions shape public policy. Cambridge University Press.
- Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (Eds.) (2011). Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. Oxford University Press.
- Bevir, M., & Blakely, J. (2018). Interpretive social science: An anti ‑naturalist approach. Oxford University Press.
- Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2003). Interpreting British governance. Routledge.
- Boje, D., Pelly, R. D. M., Saylors, R., Saylors, J., & Trafimow, S. (2021). Implications of Tamara -Land Consciousnesses Discourses for Organization Culture Studies. Discourses on Culture, 16(1), 101—123.
- Blyth, M. (1997). Any more bright ideas? The ideational turn of comparative political economy. Comparative Politics, 29(2), 229—250.
- Blyth, M. (2003). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press.
- Boncorim, I., Bizjak, D., & Sicca, M. (2020). Workload allocation models in academia: A panopticon of neoliberal control or tools for resistance? Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 18(1), 51—69.
- Boullosa, R. de F., Peres, J. L. P., & Bessa, L. F. M. (2021). Into the field: A reflexive narrative of critical policy studies. Organizações & Sociedade, 28(97).
- Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2020). Policy learning in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, in press.
- Durnova, A., Zittoun, P., & Cooper, J. (2013). Discursive approaches to public policy. Revue française de science politique, 63, 569—577.
- Epstein, C. (2008). The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of anAnti ‑WhalingDiscourse. MIT Press.
- Fairclough, N. (1993). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
- Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.
- Fairclough, N. (2000). New labour, new language? Routledge.
- Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), 177—197.
- Ferlie, E. (2017). The new public management and public management studies. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press.
- Foucault, M. (2012). Microphysics of power. Graal. (Original work published 1975).
- Gibbons, M. (1987). Interpreting politics. Basil Blackwell.
- Gofas, A., & Hay, C. (Eds.) (2009). The role of ideas in political analysis: A portrait of contemporary debates. Routledge.
- Goldstein, J., & Keohane, R. (1993). Ideas and foreign policy. Cornell University Press.
- Hall, P. A. (1989). The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism through nations. Princeton University Press.
- Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3—19.
- Jarvis, D. S. L. (2014). Regulating higher education: Quality assurance and neoliberal managerialism in higher education—A critical introduction. Policy and Society, 33(3), 155—166.
- Jun, J. S. (2006). The social construction of public administration: Interpretive and critical perspectives. State University of New York.
- Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Harper Collins College Publishers.
- Knox, C. C. (2016). Public administrators’ use of social media platforms: Overcoming the legitimacy dilemma? Administration & Society, 48(4), 477—496.
- Lee, C. W., & Romano, Z. (2013). Democracy’s new discipline: Public deliberation as organizational strategy. Organization Studies, 34(5—6), 733—753.
- Lehman, I. M., & Gould, A. M. (2022). Preface: Power, Control and Domination: Reflections on the Constraining Power of Socio -cultural and Institutional Discourses. Discourses on Culture, 17(1), 9—19.
- Leipold, S., & Winkel, G. (2017). Discursive agency: (Re-)Conceptualizing actors and practices in the analysis of discursive policymaking. Policy Studies Journal, 45(3), 510—534.
- Lindblom, C. E., & Cohen, D. K. (1979). Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. Yale University Press.
- Mackenzie, M., Conway, E., Hastings, A., Munro, M., & O’Donnell, C. (2013). Is ‘candidacy’ a useful concept for understanding journeys through
- Beyond the Buzzwords: Why Ideas and Discourse Matter in Management public services? A critical synthesis of interpretive literature. Social Policy & Administration, 47, 806—825.
- Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. Yale University Press.
- Miao, X. W., & Zhao, Y. (2019). The agenda -setting of CDA and the evolution of research approaches. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 5, 1—10.
- Mukand, S., & Rodrik, D. (2018). The political economy of ideas: On ideas versus interests in policymaking (NBER Working Paper No. 24467).
- Newman, J. (2017). Deconstructing the debate over evidence -based policy. Critical Policy Studies, 11(2), 211—226.
- Pagani, R. N., Kovaleski, J. L., & Resende, L. M. M. (2017). Advances in the composition of Methodi Ordinatio for systematic literature review. Ciência da Informação, 46(2), 161—187.
- Qian, J. W., Wei, J. W., & Law, R. (2018). A review of critical discourse analysis in tourism studies. International Journal of Tourism Research, 20(4), 526—537.
- Rhodes, R. A. W. (2019). Public administration, the interpretive turn and storytelling. In A. Massey (Ed.), A research agenda for public administration. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Rogers, R., & Schaenen, I. (2014). Critical discourse analysis in literacy: A literature review. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(1), 121—143.
- Sabatier, P., & Jenkins ‑Smith, H. C. (Eds.) (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Westview Press.
- Schmidt, V. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303—326.
- Schmidt, V. (2012). A curious constructivism: A response to Professor Bell. British Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 705—713.
- Sikkink, K. (1991). Ideas and institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Cornell University Press.
- Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (3rd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
- Swinkels, M. (2020). How ideas matter in public policy: A review of concepts, mechanisms, and methods. International Review of Public Policy, 2(3), 281—316.
- Tafon, R. V. (2018). Taking power to the sea: Towards a theoretical critique of post -structuralist discourse of marine spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(2), 258—273.
- Taylor, D. (2011). Wellbeing and welfare: A psychosocial analysis of being well and doing well enough. Journal of Social Policy, 40(4), 777—794.
- Tian, H. L. (2019). The discursive formation of critical discourse analysis in forty years: Implications for the construction of academic discursive systems. Journal of Tianjin University of Foreign Studies, 26(1), 1—12.
- Trein, P., Meyer, I., & Maggetti, M. (2019). The integration and coordination of public policies: A systematic comparative review. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(4), 332—349.
- Vincent, S., & Mahoney, J. (2018). Critical realism and qualitative research: An introductory overview. In Doing research in the social sciences (pp. 201—216).
- Vining, A., & Weimer, D. (2008). Economic perspectives on public organizations. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn, & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 209—233).
- Vis, B. (2016). Taking stock of the comparative literature on the role of blame avoidance strategies in social policy reform. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(2), 122—137.
- Visseren‑Hamakers, I. J. (2018). A framework for analyzing and practicing integrative governance: The case of global animal and conservation governance. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(8), 1391—1414.
- Wang, R. Y., Liu, T., & Dang, H. (2018). Bridging critical institutionalism and fragmented authoritarianism in China: An analysis of centralized water policies and their local implementation in semi -arid irrigation districts. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 451—465.
- Wideman, T. J., & Masuda, J. R. (2018). Toponymic assemblages, resistance and the politics of planning in Vancouver, Canada. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(3), 383—402.
- Williams, J., Bouzarovski, S., & Swyngedouw, E. (2019). The urban resource nexus: On the politics of relationality, water—energy infrastructure and the fallacy of integration. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(4), 652—669.
- Wood, M. (2015). Puzzling and powering in policy paradigm shifts: Politicization, depoliticization and social learning. Critical Policy Studies, 9(1), 2—21.
- Xiao, H., & Li, L. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of critical discourse analysis and its implications. Discourse & Society, 32(4), 482—502.
- Xin, B. (2020). Critical discourse studies in the 21st century: Reflection and prospects. Foreign Language Research, 4, 37—42.
- Yanow, D., & Schwartz‑Shea, P. (Eds.) (2006). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. M.E. Sharpe.