Through the Magic Lens: Management, Language, and AI

Tienari, Janne; Khoreva, Violetta

doi:10.2478/doc-2025-0013

Abstract

In this essay, we explore management, language, and artificial intelligence (AI). We highlight how management performs generative AI as magic and argue for the continued crucial role of humans under conditions of AI hype. We view language as an essential part of management to impress, to weave the illusion of expertise, and to manufacture our consent. We argue that performing AI as magic brings this into sharp relief, showing how power and ideology in and around AI operate when its advancement is constructed as inevitable. We encourage discussion on this and propose more research on resistance to management performing AI, on the gendered nature of AI and its consequences, and on AI -powered management clones and their language when agentic AI enters the stage. The magic lens offers a fruitful way forward in studying these fundamentally important topics.

References

Andrews, K. R. (1989). Ethics in practice. Harvard Business Review, September— October, 1—7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bailey, M. (2006). The meanings of magic. Magic, Ritual, and Witchcraft, 1(1), 1—23.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bechky, B. A., & Davis, G. F. (2025). Resisting the algorithmic management of science: Craft and community after generative AI. Administrative Science Quarterly, 70(1), 1—22.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bender, E. M., & Hanna, A. (2024). The AI con: How to fight big tech’s hype and create the future we want. London: The Bodley Head.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cederström, C., & Spicer, A. (2015). The wellness syndrome. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cederström, C., & Spicer, A. (2017). Desperately seeking self ‑improvement: A year inside the optimization movement. New York: OR Books.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cockburn, C. (1985). Machinery of dominance: Women, men and technical know ‑how. London: Pluto Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Davis, E. (2015). TechGnosis. Myth, magic & mysticism in the age of information. USA: North Atlantic Books.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Einola, K., & Khoreva, V. (2023). Best friend or broken tool? Exploring the co--existence of humans and artificial intelligence in the workplace ecosystem. Human Resource Management, 62(1), 117—135.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Einola, K., Khoreva, V., & Tienari, J. (2024). A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot entering the workplace. Human Relations, 77(11), 1620—1649.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Einola, K., Khoreva., V., & Myllymäki, D. (2025). Boundary work, anyone? Exploring everyday encounters between Winnie the Bot and humans around it. In T. Pääkkönen & S. (Eds.), Miettinen Boundary Spanning Design for Better Organisation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Elish, M. C., & Boyd, D. (2018). Situating methods in the magic of big data and AI. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 57—80.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fischer, T., & Alvesson, M. (2025). A theory of leadership meta -talk and the talking -doing gap. Journal of Management Studies, in press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fleming, P. (2019). Robots and organization studies: Why robots might not want to steal your job. Organization Studies, 40(1), 23—38.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1: An Introduction. London: Lane.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and Power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972—1977 (pp. 109—133). New York: Pantheon Books.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Francisco, V. (2015). ‘The internet is magic’: Technology, intimacy and transnational families. Critical Sociology, 41(1), 173—190.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Frankfurt, H. G. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gell, A. (1988). Technology and magic. Anthropology Today, 4(2), 6—9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hannigan, T., McCarthy, I. P., & Spicer, A. (2024). Beware of botshit: How to manage the epistemic risks of generative chatbots. Business Horizons, 67(5): 471—486.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Haraway, D. (1985). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 80, 65—108.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jackall, R. (1988). Moral Mazes: The world of corporate managers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jiang, F., & Hyland, K. (2025). Does ChatGPT write like a student? Engagement markers in argumentative essays. Written Communication, 42(3), 463—492.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johansson, J., Tienari, J., & Valtonen, A. (2017). The body, identity and gender in managerial athleticism. Human Relations, 70(9), 1141—1167.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Korzynski, P., Edwards, A., Gupta, M. C., Mazurek, G., & Wirtz, J. (2025). Humanoid robotics and agentic AI: Reframing management theories and future research directions. European Management Journal, 43(4), 548—560.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Krakowski, S., Luger, J., & Raisch, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the changing sources of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 44(6), 1425—1452.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kuhn, G., Amlani, A. A., & Rensink, R. A. (2008). Towards a science of magic. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(9), 349—354.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lagerkvist, A. & Reimer, B. (2023). Bothering the binaries: Unruly AI futures of hauntings and hope at the limit. In Handbook of Critical Studies of Artificial Intelligence, ed. S. Lindgren (pp. 199—208). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Laine, P.‑M., Meriläinen, S., Tienari, J., & Vaara, E. (2016). Mastery, submission and subversion: On the performative construction of strategist identity. Organization, 23(4), 505—524.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lange, A.‑C., Lenglet, M., & Seyfert, R. (2019). On studying algorithms ethnographically: Making sense of objects of ignorance. Organization, 26(4), 598—617.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Larson, B. Z., Moser, C., Caza, A., Muehlfeld, K., & Colombo, L. A. (2024). Critical thinking in the age of generative AI. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 23(3), 373—378.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Larsson, S., & Viktorelius, M. (2024). Reducing the contingency of the world: Magic, oracles, and machine-learning technology. AI & Society, 39, 183—193.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leaver, T., & Srdarov, S. (2023). ChatGPT isn’t magic: The hype and hypocrisy of generative artificial intelligence (AI) rhetoric. M/C Journal, 26(5).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lindebaum, D., & Fleming, P. (2024). ChatGPT undermines human reflexivity, scientific responsibility and responsible management research. British Journal of Management, 35(2), 566—575.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liu, H., & Baker, C. (2015). White Knights: Leadership as the heroicisation of whiteness. Leadership, 12(4), 420—448.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maaranen, A., den Hond, F., & Vesa, M. (2022). Social media and bias 2.0. In M. Sandberg & J. Tienari (Eds.), Transformative Action for Sustainable Outcomes: Responsible Organising (pp. 93—98). London: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Manasi, A., Panchanadeswaran, S., Sours, E., & Lee, S.J. (2022). Mirroring the bias: Gender and artificial intelligence. Gender, Technology and Development, 26(3), 295—305.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Meriläinen, S., Tienari, J. & Valtonen, A. (2015). Headhunters and the ‘ideal’ executive body. Organization, 22(1), 3—22.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MIT (2025). The GenAI divide: State of AI in business 2025. MIT NANDA (Aditya Challapally, Chris Pease, Ramesh Raskar & Pradyumna Chari). Retrieved from https://mlq.ai/media/quarterly_decks/v0.1_State_of_AI_in_Business_2025_Report.pdf. Accessed 24 November 2025.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mumby, D. K., Thomas, R., Martí, I., & Seidl, D. (2017). Resistance redux. Organization Studies, 38(9), 1157—1183.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Murray, A., Rhymer, J., & Sirmon, D. G. (2021). Humans and technology: Forms of conjoined agency in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 46(3), 552—571.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Narayanan, A. & Kapoor, S. (2024). AI snake oil: What artificial intelligence can do, what it can’t, and how to tell the difference. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Obadia, L. (2022). (Online) spelling the (digital) spell: Talking about magic in the digital revolution. Sophia, 61, 23—40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Orlikowski, W. J. (2005). Material works: Exploring the situated entanglement of technological performativity and human agency. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 183—186.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation -augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192—210.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scarbrough, H., Chen, Y., & Patriotta, G. (2024). The AI of the beholder: Intra--professional sensemaking of an epistemic technology. Journal of Management Studies, 62(5), 1885—1913.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sharkey, N., & Sharkey, A. (2006). Artificial intelligence and natural magic. Artificial Intelligence Review, 25, 9—19.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Spicer, A. (2017). Business bullshit. New York: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stivers, R. (2001). Technology as magic: The triumph of the irrational. New York and London: Continuum.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tienari, J. (2025). Learning about artificial intelligence? Cluelessness, courage, and magic in facing a moving target. Management Learning, in press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Truitt, E. R. (2015). Medieval robots: Mechanism, magic, nature, and art. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vesa, M., & Tienari, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence and rationalized unaccountability: Ideology of the elites? Organization, 29(6), 1133—1145.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vuori, N. (2025). Generative AI in strategy work and firm performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vuori, N., Burkhard, B., & Pitkäranta, L. (2025). It’s amazing—but terrifying! Unveiling the combined effect of emotional and cognitive trust on organizational member’ behaviours, AI performance, and adoption. Journal of Management Studies, in press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wacker, H. (2025). Montako minuuttia johtaja pystyy olemaan puhumatta tekoälystä? Helsingin Sanomat, June 30, 2025. [How many minutes can an executive avoid talking about AI?].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143—152.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Through the Magic Lens: Management, Language, and AI

Abstract

Paradigm

My account