Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Einfühlung: Tracing the Personalisation of the Herderian Concept of Culture in American Academia Cover

Einfühlung: Tracing the Personalisation of the Herderian Concept of Culture in American Academia

Open Access
|Jun 2025

References

  1. Ackermann, A. (2016). Wider die „Culturbrille“ — Versuch, Hartmut Böhmes „Perspektiven der Kulturwissenschaft “auszuweiten. Kulturwissenschaftliche Zeitschrift, 1(1), 32–38. DOI: 10.1515/kwg-2016-0004.
  2. Bartosch, D. (2022). Harmonic power or soft power? Philosophical reflections on culture and future globalization in view of classical wisdom from China and other ancient civilizations. International Communication of Chinese Culture, 9(1), 69–83. DOI: 10.1007/s40636-022-00245-5.
  3. Bassi, M. (2023). From Herder to Strecker: Birth and Developments of the Anthropological Notion of Culture in Germany. In G. D’Agostino, & V. Matera (Eds.), Histories of Anthropology (pp. 127–155). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-21258-1_4.
  4. Boas, F. (1887). The study of geography. Science, 9(210), 137–141.
  5. Boas, F. (1901). The mind of primitive man. Science, 13(321), 281–289.
  6. Boas, F. (1937). Race and Race Prejudice. Jewish Social Service Quarterly, 14(2), 227–232.
  7. Benedict, R. (193). Patterns of Culture. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  8. Briggs, C. L. (2005). Genealogies of race and culture and the failure of vernacular cosmopolitanisms: Rereading Franz Boas and W. E. B. Du Bois. Public Culture, 17(1), 75–100. DOI: 10.1215/08992363-17-1-75.
  9. Bronner, S. J. (2021). The (Re) Cognition of Folklore: A History and Philosophy. Western Folklore, 80(3), 271–311.
  10. Brown, M. F. (2008). Cultural relativism 2.0. Current Anthropology, 49(3), 363–383. DOI: 10.1086/529261.
  11. Chrostowska, S. D. (2021). Progress: From Literature to History. Common Knowledge, 27(2), 262–279. DOI: 10.1215/0961754x-8906159.
  12. Curtis, R. (2012). Einfühlung and abstraction in the moving image: Historical and contemporary reflections. Science in Context, 25(3), 425–446. DOI: 10.1017/s0269889712000178.
  13. Curtis, R. (2014). An introduction to Einfühlung (R.G. Elliott, Trans.). Art in Translation, 6(4), 353–376. DOI: 10.1080/17561310.2014.11425535.
  14. De Vos, J. (2011). Psychologization or the discontents of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 16, 354–372. DOI: 10.1057/pcs.2010.29.
  15. Edwards, L. H. (2013). A brief conceptual history of Einfühlung: 18th-century Germany to post-World War II US psychology. History of Psychology, 16(4), 269–281. DOI: 10.1037/a0033634.
  16. Espagne, M. (2002). La question des imbrications culturelles chez Franz Boas. Revue Germanique Internationale, 17, 147–160. DOI: 10.4000/rgi.892.
  17. Gallese, V. (2008). Empathy, embodied simulation, and the brain: Commentary on Aragno and Zepf/Hartmann. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 56(3), 769–781. DOI: 10.1177/0003065108322206.
  18. Hackl, J., Märker, M., & Doblmair, M. (2024). Interpretation With/Through/Toward Intersectionality: Difficulties and Opportunities. International Review of Qualitative Research, 17(2) 134–148. DOI: 10.1177/19408447241256051.
  19. Herder, J. G. (1800). Outlines of a Philosophy of the History of Man (T. Churchill, Trans.). Bergman Publishers. (Original work published 1784).
  20. Holzhey, C. F. (2006). On the emergence of sexual difference in the 18th century: economies of pleasure in Herder’s Liebe und Selbstiheit. The German Quarterly, 79(1), 1–27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-1183.2006.tb00031.x.
  21. Jakupi, A. B. (2018). Psycosmogenic patterns: A premise for environmental harmony. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(3), 313–322. DOI: 10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n3p313.
  22. Jaspers, J. (2016). Crisis thinking, sensuous reflexivity, and solving real issues. AILA Review, 29(1), 199–213. DOI: 10.1075/aila.29.08jas.
  23. Juvekar, J., & Murali, R. (2022). The role of empathy and vicarious trauma on wisdom and psychological distress among lawyers. Indian Journal of Mental Health, 9(2), 142–149. DOI: 10.30877/ijmh.9.2.2022.142-149.
  24. Kwon, S. Y. (2005). “God may NOT be a Person”: A Case of Cultural Construction of God Representations. Pastoral Psychology, 53(5), 405–421. DOI: 10.1007/s11089-005-2584-z.
  25. Kroeber, K. (1992). American Indian persistence and resurgence. Boundary 2, 19(3), 1–25. DOI: 10.2307/303546.
  26. Lanzoni, S. (2012). Empathy in translation: Movement and image in the psychological laboratory. Science in Context, 25(3), 301–327. DOI: 10.1017/s0269889712000154.
  27. Lerner, J., & Rivkin-Fish, M. (2021). On emotionalisation of public domains. Emotions and Society, 3(1), 3–14. DOI: 10.1332/263169021 × 16149420135743.
  28. Mathäs, A. (2013). Building bridges: the importance of Johann Gottfried Herder’s humanism for the humanities. Humanitas, 26(1/2), 94–128. DOI: 10.5840/humanitas2013261/26.
  29. Matthiesen, N., & Klitmøller, J. (2019). Encountering the stranger: Hannah Arendt and the shortcomings of empathy as a moral compass. Theory & Psychology, 29(2), 182–199. DOI: 10.1177/0959354319828174.
  30. Mietelski, T. (2022). Empathy and phenomenology. Edith Stein’s theory of Einfühlung. Bollettino Filosofico, 37, 287–300. DOI: 10.6093/1593-7178/9678.
  31. Montag, C., Gallinat, J., & Heinz, A. (2008). Theodor Lipps and the concept of empathy: 1851–1914. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(10), 1261–1261. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07081283.
  32. Murray, S. O. (1981). Sapir’s Gestalt. Anthropological Linguistics, 23(1), 8–12.
  33. Nowak, M. (2011). The complicated history of Einfühlung. Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal, 1(2), 301–326.
  34. O’Meara, J. T. (1999). Causal individualism and the unification of anthropology. In E. L. Cerroni-Lond (Ed.), Anthropological Theory in North America (pp. 105–142). Bergin & Garvey.
  35. Özyürek, E. (2018). Rethinking empathy: Emotions triggered by the Holocaust among the Muslim-minority in Germany. Anthropological Theory, 18(4), 456–477. DOI: 10.1177/1463499618782369.
  36. Pais, M. R. (2024). Function follows form: considerations on hard heritage facing the climate emergency. Architecture, 4(1), 46–72. DOI: 10.3390/architecture4010005.
  37. Patoine, P. L. (2022). The role of empathy in literary reading: From Einfühlung to the neuroscience of embodied cognition, with the example of Kafka’s The Metamorphosis. Seminar: A Journal of Germanic Studies, 58(1), 11–37. DOI: 10.3138/seminar.58.1.1.
  38. Parker, I. (2010). The place of transference in psychosocial research. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 30(1), 17–31. DOI: 10.1037/a0019104.
  39. Preston, R. J. (1966). Edward Sapir’s anthropology: Style, structure, and method. American Anthropologist, 68(5), 1105–1128. DOI: 10.1525/aa.1966.68.5.02a00010.
  40. Romand, D. (2015). Theodor Waitz’s theory of feelings and the rise of affective sciences in the mid-19th century. History of Psychology, 18(4), 385–400. DOI: 10.1037/a0039797.
  41. Simons, M. (2023). “Changing” one’s mind: Historical epistemology as normative psychology. Metaphilosophy, 54(2–3), 295–308. DOI: 10.1111/meta.12616.
  42. Schrempp, G. (1989). Aristotle’s other self: on the boundless subject of anthropological discourse. In G.W. Stocking (Ed.), Romantic motives: Essays on anthropological sensibility (pp. 10–43). The University of Wisconsin Press.
  43. Scupin, R. (2018). Culture: The use and abuse. In C. L. Frisby, & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), Cultural Competence in Applied Psychology: An Evaluation of Current Status and Future Directions (pp. 243–268). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78997-2_11.
  44. Shore, B. (2000). Human diversity and human nature. The life and times of a false dichotomy. In N. Roughley (Ed.), Being Humans: Anthropological Universality and Particularity in Transdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 81–104). De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110822809.81.
  45. Steigerwald, D. (2004). Culture’s Vanities: The Paradox of Cultural Diversity in a Globalized World. Rowman & Littlefield.
  46. Stern, B. J. (1943). Franz Boas as scientist and citizen. Science & Society, 7(3), 289–320.
  47. Stern, N. (2022). “Philology’s a Thing of God!”: Edward Sapir and the Jewish Subtexts of American Anthropology. Anthropological Quarterly, 95(1), 157–184. DOI: 10.1353/anq.2022.0004.
  48. Taylor, T. (2011). The Brno effect: from culture to mind. Journal of World Prehistory, 24, 213–225. DOI: 10.1007/s10963-011-9052-8.
  49. Tehranian, K. K. (1998). Global communication and pluralization of identities. Futures, 30(2–3), 211–217. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-3287(98)00028-7.
  50. Trigger, B. G. (2004). Cross-cultural comparison and archaeological theory. In L. Meskell, & R.W. Preucel (Eds.), A Companion to Social Archaeology (pp. 43–65). Blackwell Publishing. DOI: 10.1002/9780470693605.ch2.
  51. Verdon, M. (2007). Franz Boas: Cultural history for the present, or obsolete natural history? Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13(2), 433–451. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00435.x.
  52. Voelz, J. (2021). Transnational dimensions of Romanticism. In P. Löffler, C. Spahr, & J. Stievermann (Eds.), Handbook of American Romanticism (pp. 55–80). DeGruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110592238-004.
  53. Webster, Y. O. (1997). Against the Multicultural Agenda: A Critical Thinking alternative. Praeger Publishers.
Language: English
Page range: 19 - 44
Submitted on: Jan 6, 2025
|
Accepted on: Mar 7, 2025
|
Published on: Jun 19, 2025
Published by: SAN University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Alexandru Casian, published by SAN University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.