References
- Asay, Jamin. [2014]. “Against truth”. Erkenntnis 79: 147–64.
- Beall, J. C. [2000]. “On mixed inferences and pluralism about truth predicates”. Philosophical Quarterly 200: 380–2.
- Beall, J. C. & Restall, Greg [2005]. Logical Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Caret, Colin [2017]. “The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated”. Erkenntnis 82: 739–60.
- Cook, Roy [2010]. “Let a thousand flowers bloom: A tour of logical pluralism”. Philosophy Compass 6: 492–504.
- Cotnoir, Aaron [2013]. “Validity for strong pluralists”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86: 563–79.
- Edwards, Douglas [2009]. “Truth-conditions and the nature of truth: Re-solving mixed conjunctions”. Analysis 69: 684–8.
- Edwards, Douglas [2013]. “Truth as a substantive property”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91: 279–94.
- Gamester, Will [2019]. “Logic, logical form and the disunity of truth”. Analysis 79: 34–43.
- Hjortland, Ole Thomassen [2017]. “Anti-exceptionalism about logic”. Philosophical Studies 174: 631–58.
- Hjortland, Ole Thomassen and Martin, Ben [2022]. “Anti-exceptionalism about logic as tradition rejection”. Synthese 200: 1–33.
- Hjortland, Ole Thomassen and Martin, Ben [2024]. “Anti-exceptionalism about logic (Part I): From naturalism to anti-exceptionalism”. Philosophy Compass 19: e13014.
- Hjortland, Ole Thomassen and Martin, Ben [2025]. “Anti-exceptionalism about logic (Part II): Methodological anti-exceptionalism about logic”. Philosophy Compass 20: e70018.
- Keefe, Rosanna [2018]. “Pluralisms: Logic, truth and domain-specificity”. In Pluralisms in Truth and Logic, J. Wyatt, N. J. L. L. Pedersen, & N. Kellen (eds). Cham and Basingstoke: Springer Verlag: 429–52.
- Kellen, Nathan, Wyatt, Jeremy, & Pedersen, Nikolaj J. L. L. (eds) [2018]. Pluralisms in Truth and Logic. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
- Iacona, Andrea [2023]. “Valid arguments as true conditionals”. Mind 526: 428–51.
- Lewis, David [1983]. “New work for a theory of universals”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 343–77.
- Lynch, Michael [2001], “A functionalist theory of truth”. In The Nature of Truth: Classic and Contemporary Perspectives, M. Lynch (ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 723–49.
- Lynch, Michael [2009]. Truth as One and Many. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Lynch, Michael and Pedersen, Nikolaj J.L.L., [2018]. “Truth pluralism”. In The Oxford Handbook of Truth, M. Glanzberg (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lynch, Michael and Shapiro, Stewart. [2019]. “Does logical pluralism imply, or suggest, truth pluralism, or vice versa?”. Synthese 198: 4925–36.
- Pedersen, Nikolaj J.L.L. [2006]. “What can the problem of mixed inferences teach us about alethic pluralism?”. The Monist 89: 103–117.
- Pedersen, Nikolaj J.L.L. [2014]. “Pluralism × 3: Truth, logic, metaphysics”. Erkenntnis 79: 259–77.
- Rossberg, Marcus and Shapiro, Stewart [2021]. “Logic and science: science and logic”. Synthese 199: 6429–54.
- Russell, Gillian and Blake-Turner, Chris [2023]. “Logical pluralism”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2023 Edition), E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (eds). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/logical-pluralism
- Shapiro, Lionel [2011]. “Deflating logical consequence”. Philosophical Quarterly 243: 320–42.
- Shapiro, Lionel [2022]. “What is logical deflationism? Two non-metalinguistic conceptions of logic”. Synthese 200: 1–28.
- Strollo, Andrea [2014]. “How simple is the simplicity of truth? Reconciling the mathematics and the metaphysics of truth”. In New Frontiers in Truth, F. Bacchini, S. Caputo & M. Dell’Utri (eds). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press: 161–75.
- Strollo, Andrea [2016]. “A simple notion of validity for alethic pluralism”. Synthese 195: 1529–46.
- Strollo, Andrea [2018]. “Algebraic semantics and mixed validities: A Reply to Cotnoir”. Logique et Analyse 61.
- Strollo, Andrea [2021]. “Truth pluralism and many-valued logic: Lesson from Suszko’s thesis”. Philosophical Quarterly 72: 155–76.
- Strollo, Andrea [2024]. “Truth and the unity of logical validity”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 33: 263–87.
- Tappolet, Christine, [1997]. “Mixed inferences: a problem for pluralism about truth predicates”. Analysis 57: 209–10.
- Tappolet, Christine [2000]. “Truth pluralism and many-valued logics: A reply to Beall”. Philosophical Quarterly 200: 382–5.
- Williamson, Timothy [1994]. “A critical study of Crispin Wright, Truth and Objectivity”. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 30: 130–44.
- Williamson Timothy [forthcoming]. “Is logic about validity?”. In The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Logic, F. Ferrari, E. Brendel, M. Carrara, O. Hjortland, G. Sagi & G. Sher (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Wright, Crispin, [1992]. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.