References
- Alspector-Kelly, Marc [2001]. “On Quine on Carnap on ontology”. Philosophical Studies 102: 93–122.
- Belleri, Delia [2020]. “Ontological disputes and the phenomenon of metalinguistic negotiation: Charting the territory”. Philosophy Compass 15.
- Brandom, Robert [1994]. Making It Explicit. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
- Broughton, Gabriel [2021]. “Carnapian frameworks”. Synthese 199: 4097–126.
- Carnap, Rudolf [1937]. The Logical Syntax of Language. London: Routlege.
- Carnap, Rudolf [1950] “Empiricism, semantic and ontology”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4: 20–40.
- Carnap, Rudolf [1990]. “Quine on analyticity”. In Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine-
- Carnap Correspondence and Related Work, edited by R. Creath. Berkeley: University of California Press: 428–33.
- Creath, Richard [2007]. In The Cambridge Companion to Carnap, edited by M. Friedman & R. Creath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 315–36.
- Decock, Lieven [2017]. “Quine’s “strictly vegetarian” analyticity”. The Monist 100: 288–310.
- Drobňák, Matej [2017]. “Quine on shared language and linguistic communities”. Philosophia 46: 83–99.
- Eklund, Matti [2009]. “Carnap and ontological pluralism”. In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by D. J. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 130–56.
- Eklund, Matti [2013]. “Carnap’s metaontology”. Noûs 37: 229-49.
- Eklund, Matti [2023]. “Carnapian frameworks revisited”. Acta Philosophica Fennica 100: 91–113.
- George, Alexander [2000]. “On washing the fur without wetting it: Quine, Carnap, and analyticity”. Mind 109: 1–24.
- Grice, Hebert Paul & Strawson, Peter Frederick [1956]. “In defence of a dogma”. The Philosophical Review 64: 141–58.
- Hirsch, Eli [2011]. Quantifier variance and realism: Essays in metaontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hirsch, Eli [2016]. Ontology and Alternative Languages, InOntology after Carnap, edited by S. Lapointe & S. Blatti. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press: 105–21.
- Hylton, Peter [2021]. “Carnap and Quine on analyticity: The nature of the disagreement”. Noûs 55: 445–62.
- O’Grady, Paul [1999]. “Carnap and two dogmas of empiricism”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59: 1015–27. DOI: 10.2307/2653567.
- Peregrin, Jaroslav [2020]. “Rudolf Carnap’s inferentialism”. In The Vienna Circle in Czechoslovakia, edited by R. Schuster . Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 23: 97–108
- Plunkett, David [2015]. Which concepts should we use?: Metalinguistic negotiations and the methodology of Philosophy. Inquiry 58: 828–74.
- Price, Huw [2009a]. “Metaphysics after Carnap: The ghost who walks?’. In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by D. J. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 320–46.
- Price, Huw [2009b]. “The semantic foundations of metaphysics”. In Minds, Ethics, and Conditionals: Themes from the Philosophy of Frank Jackson, edited by I. Ravenscroft. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Price, Huw [2011]. Naturalism without Mirrors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Price, Huw [2023]. “Time for pragmatism”. In Neopragmatism, edited by J. Gert. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 23–69.
- Quine, Willard Van Orman [1951a]. “On Carnap’s views on ontology”. Philosophical Studies 2: 65–72.
- Quine, Willard Van Orman [1951b]. “Two dogmas of empiricism”. The Philosophical Review 60: 20–43.
- Quine, Willard Van Orman [1960]. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
- Quine, Willard Van Orman [1969]. Ontological Relativity, and Other Essays. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
- Quine, Willard Van Orman [1970]. “Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory”. Synthese 21: 386–98.
- Quine, Willard Van Orman [1976]. The Ways of Paradox, and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Quine, Willard Van Orman [1989]. Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
- Quine, Willard Van Orman [1992]. Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Richardson, Alan [2003]. “Logical empiricism, American pragmatism, and the fate of scientific philosophy in North America”. In Logical empiricism in North America, edited by G. L. Hardcastle & A. W. Richardson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 1–24.
- Schaffer, Jonathan [2009]. “The deflationary metaontology of Thomasson’s ordinary objects”. Philosophical Books 50: 142–57.
- Thomasson, Amie [2015]. Ontology Made Easy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Thomasson, Amie [2020]. Norms and Necessity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Williams, Michael [2013]. “How pragmatists can be local expressivists”. In Expressivism, Pragmatism and Representationalism, edited by H. Price. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 128–44.