References
- Alston, William P. [1996]. “Belief, acceptance, and religious faith”. In Faith, Freedom, and Rationality: Philosophy of Religion Today, edited by J. Jordan & D. Howard-Snyder. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Archer, Avery [2019]. “Agnosticism, inquiry, and unanswerable questions”. Disputatio 11: 63–88.
- Archer, Avery [2022]. “The questioning-attitude account of agnosticism”. Synthese 200: 1–15.
- Archer, Avery [2025]. “Agnosticism-involving doxastic inconsistency”. Erkenntnis 90: 1159–76.
- Audi, Robert [2008]. “Belief, faith, and acceptance”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63: 87–102.
- Bergmann, Michael [2005]. “Defeaters and higher-level requirements”. The Philosophical Quarterly 55: 419–36.
- Borgoni, Cristina, Kindermann, Dirk and Onofri, Andrea (Eds.) [2021]. The Fragmented Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Bratman, Michael E. [1992]. “Practical reasoning and acceptance in a context”. Mind 101: 1–16.
- Buckareff, Andrei A. [2004]. “Acceptance and deciding to believe”. Journal of Philosophical Research 29: 173–90.
- Buckareff, Andrei A. [2005]. “Can faith be a doxastic venture?”. Religious Studies 41: 435–45.
- Buckareff, Andrei A. [2010]. “Acceptance does not entail belief”. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18: 255–61.
- Cohen, L. Jonathan [1989]. “Belief and acceptance”. Mind 98: 367–89.
- Cohen, L. Jonathan [1992]. An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Crawford, Lindsay [2022]. “Suspending judgment is something you do”. Episteme 19: 561–77.
- Crawford, Sean [2004]. “A solution for Russellians to a puzzle about belief”. Analysis 64: 223–29.
- Engel, Pascal [1998]. “Believing, holding true, and accepting”. Philosophical Explorations 1: 140–51.
- Feldman, Richard and Conee, Earl [2018]. “Between belief and disbelief”. In Believing in Accordance with the Evidence: New Essays on Evidentialism, edited by K. McCain. Cham: Springer.
- Ferrari, Filippo and Incurvati, Luca [2022]. “The varieties of agnosticism”. The Philosophical Quarterly 72: 365–80.
- Flamini, Leonardo [2024]. “On interrogative inquiries without suspended judgement and doxastic neutrality”. Dialogue: 1–20.
- Frankish, Keith [2012]. “Delusions, levels of belief, and non-doxastic acceptances”. Neuroethics 5: 23–7.
- Friedman, Jane [2013]. “Suspended judgment”. Philosophical Studies 162: 165–81.
- Friedman, Jane [2017]. “Why suspend judging?”. Noûs 51: 302–26.
- Friedman, Jane [2019]. “Checking again”. Philosophical Issues 29: 84–96.
- Friedman, Jane [forthcoming]. “Zetetic epistemology”. In Towards an Expansive Epistemology: Norms, Action, and the Social Sphere, edited by B. Reed & A. K. Flowerree. Routledge.
- Hájek, Alan [1998]. “Agnosticism meets Bayesianism”. Analysis 58: 199–206.
- Lord, Errol [2020]. “Suspension of judgment, rationality’s competition, and the reach of the epistemic”. In The Ethics of Belief and Beyond: Understanding Mental Normativity, edited by S. Schmidt & G. Ernst. New York: Routledge.
- Lord, Errol and Sylvan, Kurt [2021]. “Suspension, higher-order evidence, and defeat”. In Reasons, Justification, and Defeat, edited by J. Brown & M. Simion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lord, Errol and Sylvan, Kurt [forthcoming]. “Beginning in wonder: Suspensive attitudes and epistemic dilemmas”. In Epistemic Dilemmas, edited by N. Hughes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Masny, Michal [2020]. “Friedman on suspended judgment”. Synthese 197: 5009–26.
- McGrath, Matthew [2021]. “Being neutral: Agnosticism, inquiry and the suspension of judgment”. Noûs 55: 463–84.
- Raleigh, Thomas [2021]. “Suspending is believing”. Synthese 198: 2449–74.
- Rosa, Luis [2019]. “Logical principles of agnosticism”. Erkenntnis 84: 1263–83.
- Rosa, Luis [2021]. “Rational requirements for suspended judgment”. Philosophical Studies 178: 385–406.
- Rosa, Luis [2023]. “Suspending judgment the correct way”. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 66: 2001–23.
- Stalnaker, Robert C. [1987]. Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Tuomela, Raimo [2000]. “Belief versus acceptance”. Philosophical Explorations 3: 122–37.
- Van Fraassen, Bas C. [1980]. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Van Fraassen, Bas C. [1998]. “The agnostic subtly probabilified”. Analysis 58: 212–20.
- Velleman, J. David [2000]. The Possibility of Practical Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Wagner, Verena [2022]. “Agnosticism as settled indecision”. Philosophical Studies 179: 671–97.
- Wedgwood, Ralph [2002]. “The aim of belief”. Noûs 36: 267–97.