Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Virtual isn’t Real Cover
By: Marc Champagne  
Open Access
|Jan 2026

References

  1. Agatonović, Miloš [2023]. “The fiction of simulation: A critique of Bostrom’s simulation argument”. AI & Society 38: 1579–86.
  2. Atkins, Richard Kenneth [2023]. Peirce on Inference: Validity, Strength, and the Community of Inquirers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Bain, Alexander [1872]. Mental and Moral Science: A Compendium of Psychology and Ethics. London: Longmans, Green and Company.
  4. Baudrillard, Jean [1995]. Simulacra and Simulation. Translated by Sheila Faria Glaser. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  5. Baudrillard, Jean [2004]. The Intelligence of Evil or The Lucidity Pact. Translated by Chris Turner. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  6. Bellucci, Francesco, and Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen [2020]. “Peirce on the justification of abduction”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 84: 12–19.
  7. Bostrom, Nick [2003]. “Are we living in a computer simulation?” The Philosophical Quarterly 53: 243–255.
  8. Bown, Johnathan, Elisa White, and Akshya Boopalan [2017]. “Looking for the ultimate display: A brief history of virtual reality”. In Boundaries of Self and Reality Online: Implications of Digitally Constructed Realities, edited by J. Gackenbach & J. Bown. London: Elsevier, 239–59.
  9. Breil, Patrizia [2024]. “It’s real. All the way down”. Philosophy and Digitality 1: 40–42.
  10. Brooks, Rodney A. [1991]. “Intelligence without representation”. Artificial Intelligence 47: 139–159.
  11. Bueno, Otávio [2005]. “Davidson and skepticism: How not to respond to the skeptic”. Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 9: 1–18.
  12. Cadwalladr, Carole [2017]. “Daniel Dennett: ‘I begrudge every hour I have to spend worrying about politics’ “. The Guardian, February 12. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/feb/12/daniel-dennett-politicsbacteria-bach-back-dawkins-trump-interview.
  13. Carman, Taylor [2007]. “Dennett on seeming”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6: 99–106.
  14. Chalmers, David J. [1996]. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
  15. Chalmers, David J. [2005]. “The Matrix as metaphysics”. In Philosophers Explore The Matrix, edited by C. Grau. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 132–76.
  16. Chalmers, David J. [2017]. “The virtual and the real”. Disputatio 9: 309–352.
  17. Chalmers, David J. [2018]. “Structuralism as a response to skepticism”. Journal of Philosophy 115: 625–60.
  18. Chalmers, David J. [2019]. “The virtual as the digital”. Disputatio 11: 453–86.
  19. Chalmers, David J. [2022]. Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy. New York: W. W. Norton.
  20. Chalmers, David J. and Paul Doolan [2022]. “Interview”. Philosophy Now 148: 41–3. https://philosophynow.org/issues/148/David_Chalmers.
  21. Chalmers, David J. and Prashanth Ramakrishna [2019]. “ ‘There’s just no doubt that it will change the world’: David Chalmers on V.R. and A.I”. The New York Times, June 18. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/18/opinion/david-chalmers-virtual-reality.html.
  22. Chalmers, David J. and Ian Sample [2022]. “ ‘Virtual reality is genuine reality’ so embrace it, says philosopher”. The Guardian, January 17. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/jan/17/virtual-reality-is-genuine-reality-so-embrace-it-says-us-philosopher
  23. Chalmers, David J. and Richard Webb [2022]. “Virtual reality is as real as physical reality, but just different”. New Scientist 253: 48–51.
  24. Champagne, Marc [2015]. “Disjunctivism and the ethics of disbelief”. Philosophical Papers 44: 139–163.
  25. Champagne, Marc [2020]. Myth, Meaning, and Antifragile Individualism. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.
  26. Champagne, Marc [2022]. “Reality and semiosis”. In Bloomsbury Semiotics, vol. 1, edited by J. Pelkey. London: Bloomsbury: 129–47.
  27. Champagne, Marc [2023a]. “Illusory signs as frustrated expectations: Undoing Descartes’ overblown response”. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 79: 1073–96.
  28. Champagne, Marc [2023b]. “My life gives the moral landscape its relief”. In Sam Harris: Critical Responses, edited by S. L. Woien. Chicago: Carus Books: 17–38.
  29. Champagne, Marc [2024]. “Putting aside one’s natural attitude—and smartphone—to see what matters more clearly”. In Phaneroscopy and Phenomenology: A Neglected Chapter in the History of Ideas, edited by A. Pietarinen & M. Shafiei. Cham: Springer: 25–55.
  30. Chapple-Sokol, Sam [2013]. “Culinary diplomacy: Breaking bread to win hearts and minds”. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 8: 161–183.
  31. Chess, Brian and Jacob West [2007]. Secure Programming with Static Analysis. Upper Saddle River: Addison-Wesley.
  32. Christou, Chris, and Andrew Parker [1995]. “Visual realism and virtual reality: A psychological perspective”. In Simulated and Virtual Realities: Elements of Perception, edted by Karen Carr & Rupert England. London: Taylor and Francis: 53–84.
  33. Cline, Ernest [2011]. Ready Player One. New York: Crown.
  34. Cohen, Alix A. [2008]. “The ultimate Kantian experience: Kant on dinner parties”. History of Philosophy Quarterly 25: 315–36.
  35. Davidson, Donald [2001]. Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon.
  36. Deely, John N. [1990]. Basics of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  37. De Rosa, Raffaella [2010]. Descartes and the Puzzle of Sensory Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  38. Descartes, René [1984]. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 2. Translated by J.
  39. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff & D. Murdoch. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  40. Dietrich, Eric, Chris Fields, Sullins, John P., Van Heuveln, Bram and Zebrowski, Robin [2022]. “The AI wars, 1950-2000, and their consequences”. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness 9: 127–51.
  41. Dingli, Sandra M. [2005]. On Thinking and the World: John McDowell’s Mind and World. Burlington: Ashgate.
  42. Douglas, Emily R. [2013]. “Eat or be eaten: A feminist phenomenology of women as food”. PhaenEx: Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture 8: 243–54.
  43. Douglas, Mary [2003]. Constructive Drinking: Perspectives on Drink from Anthropology. London: Routledge.
  44. Dryden, Jane [2016]. “Digestion, habit, and being at home: Hegel and the gut as ambiguous other”. PhaenEx: Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture 11: 1–22.
  45. Eco, Umberto [1976]. A Theory of Semiotics. Translated by David Osmond-Smith. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  46. Ewuoso, Cornelius, and Sue Hall [2019]. “Core aspects of ubuntu: A systematic review”. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 12: 93–103.
  47. Friedman, Cindy [2023]. “Ethical concerns with replacing human relations with humanoid robots: An ubuntu perspective”. AI and Ethics 3: 527–38.
  48. Gallagher, Shaun [2006]. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon.
  49. Garley, Matt, and Benjamin Slade [2016]. “Virtual meatspace: Word formation and deformation in cyberpunk discussions”. In English in Computer-Mediated Communication: Variation, Representation, and Change, edited by L. Squires. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 123–47.
  50. Gathogo, Julius M. [2008]. “African philosophy as expressed in the concepts of hospitality and ubuntu”. Journal of Theology for Southern Africa 130: 39–53.
  51. Gibson, William [1988]. Neuromancer. New York: Ace.
  52. Haidt, Jonathan [2024]. The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness. New York: Penguin.
  53. Han, Dai-In Danny, Yoy Bergs, and Natasha Moorhouse [2022]. “Virtual reality consumer experience escapes: Preparing for the metaverse”. Virtual Reality 26: 1443–58.
  54. Hardesty, Rebecca A., and Ben Sheredos [2019]. “Together, worlds apart: A virtual-worldly phenomenology”. Human Studies 42: 343–70.
  55. Hoffmann, Miklós [2022]. “The ontological role of applied mathematics in virtual worlds”. Philosophies 7: 1–10.
  56. Hossenfelder, Sabine [2021]. “Why the simulation hypothesis is pseudoscience”. Big Think, April 2. https://bigthink.com/thinking/why-the-simulation-hypothesis-ispseudoscience/
  57. Jager, Bernd [1999]. “Eating as natural event and as intersubjective phenomenon: Towards a phenomenology of eating”. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 30: 66–116.
  58. James, William [1907]. Pragmatism: A New Name for some Old Ways of Thinking. New York: Longmans, Green and Company, 1922.
  59. Jenkinson, John [2017]. “Enactive subjectivity as flesh”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16: 931–51.
  60. Jönsson, Håkan, Michaud, Maxime and Neuman, Nicklas [2021]. “What is commensality? A critical discussion of an expanding research field”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 1–17.
  61. Juul, Jesper [2011]. Half-Real: Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  62. Juul, Jesper [2019]. “Virtual reality: Fictional all the way down (and that’s OK)”. Disputatio 11: 333–43.
  63. Kant, Immanuel [1798]. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Translated by Robert B. Louden. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  64. Kelley, David C. [2014]. The Art of Reasoning. New York: W. W. Norton.
  65. Kim, Joohan [2001]. “Phenomenology of digital-being”. Human Studies 24: 87–111.
  66. Kim, Myung Ja, Lee, Choong-Ki and Jung, Timothy [2020]. “Exploring consumer behavior in virtual reality tourism using an extended stimulus-organism-response model”. Journal of Travel Research 59: 69–89.
  67. Kljajevic, Vanja [2021]. Consensual Illusion: The Mind in Virtual Reality. Berlin: Springer.
  68. Kniffin, Kevin M., Wansink, Brian, Devine, Carol M. and Sobal, Jeffery [2015]. “Eating together at the firehouse: How workplace commensality relates to the performance of firefighters”. Human Performance 28: 281–306.
  69. Koebler, Jason [2016]. “Elon Musk says there’s a ‘one in billions’ chance reality is not a simulation”. Vice, June 2. https://www.vice.com/en/article/8q854v/elon-musksimulated-universe-hypothesis
  70. Ladyman, James, Ross, Don, Spurrett, David and Collier, John [2007]. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  71. Lassiter, Charles and Kagan, Aaron [2024]. “Review of David Chalmers, Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 23: 997–1008.
  72. Leder, Drew [1990]. “Flesh and blood: A proposed supplement to Merleau-Ponty”. Human Studies 13: 209–19.
  73. Manson, Neil A. [2009]. “The fine-tuning argument”. Philosophy Compass 4: 271–86.
  74. Marion, Jean-Luc [2017]. Believing in Order to See: On the Rationality of Revelation and the Irrationality of Some Believers. Translated by C. M. Gschwandtner. New York: Fordham University Press.
  75. Mboti, Nyasha [2015]. “May the real ubuntu please stand up?” Journal of Media Ethics 30: 125–47.
  76. McCarron, Kevin [1996]. “Corpses, animals, machines and mannequins: The body and cyberpunk”. In Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment, edited by M. Featherstone & R. Burrows. London: SAGE, 261–73.
  77. McDonnell, Neil and Wildman, Nathan [2019]. “Virtual reality: Digital or fictional?” Disputatio 11: 371–97.
  78. McDowell, John [2006]. “The disjunctive conception of experience as material for a transcendental argument”. Teorema 25: 19–33.
  79. McStay, Andrew [2023]. “The metaverse: Surveillant physics, virtual realist governance, and the missing commons”. Philosophy & Technology 36: 1–26.
  80. Meijsing, Monica [2006]. “Real people and virtual bodies: How disembodied can embodiment be?”. Minds and Machines 16: 443–61.
  81. Meiring, Jacob [2015]. “Ubuntu and the body: A perspective from theological anthropology as embodied sensing”. Verbum et Ecclesia 36: 1–8.
  82. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice [1964]. The Visible and the Invisible. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969.
  83. Metzinger, Thomas K. [2018]. “Why is virtual reality interesting for philosophers?”. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5: 1–19.
  84. Misak, Cheryl J. [1991]. Truth and the End of Inquiry: A Peircean Account of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  85. Mol, Annemarie [2021]. Eating in Theory. Durham: Duke University Press.
  86. Morujão, Carlos and Leite, Ângela Maria Teixeira [2025]. “Somatization and embodiment”. Philosophical Psychology 38: 1318–45.
  87. Moses, Nancy [2020]. Fakes, Forgeries, and Frauds. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
  88. Moskowitz, Clara [2016]. “Are we living in a computer simulation?” Scientific American, April 7. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-we-living-in-a-computersimulation/.
  89. Neta, Ram [2008]. “In defense of disjunctivism”. In Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge, edited by A. Haddock & F. Macpherson. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 311–29.
  90. Niijima, Arinobu, and Takefumi Ogawa [2016]. “Virtual food texture by electrical muscle stimulation”. In Proceedings of the 2016 Association for Computing Machinery International Symposium on Wearable Computers. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 48–9.
  91. Norris, Christopher [2010]. “Pots, kettles and shades of black: Analytic philosophy versus postmodernism”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 251: 9–37.
  92. O’Shiel, Daniel [2020]. “Disappearing boundaries? Reality, virtuality and the possibility of ‘pure’ mixed reality (MR)”. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 20: e1887570.
  93. O’Shiel, Daniel [2022]. The Phenomenology of Virtual Technology: Perception and Imagination in a Digital Age. Dublin: Bloomsbury Academic.
  94. Peirce, Charles Sanders [1931–58]. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  95. Ranasinghe, Nimesha and Do, Ellen Yi-Luen [2016]. “Digital lollipop: Studying electrical stimulation on the human tongue to simulate taste sensations”. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 13: 1–22.
  96. Robinson, Nathan J. [2022]. “Unfortunately we are not living in a ‘simulation’: A dangerous new religious belief offers grounds for giving up on the physical world and living 100% online”. Current Affair, February 2. https://www.currentaffairs.org/2022/02/unfortunately-we-are-not-living-in-a-simulation.
  97. Romano, Claude [2015]. At the Heart of Reason. Translated by M. B. Smith and C. Romano. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  98. Ropolyi, László [2016]. “Virtuality and reality—Toward a representation ontology”. Philosophies 1: 40–54.
  99. Saker, Michael, and Jordan Frith [2020]. “Coextensive space: Virtual reality and the developing relationship between the body, the digital and physical space”. Media, Culture & Society 42: 1427–1442.
  100. Sarukkai, Sundar [2002]. “Inside/outside: Merleau-Ponty/yoga”. Philosophy East and West 52: 459–78.
  101. Schopenhauer, Arthur [1844]. The World as Will and Representation, vol. 2. Translated by Eric Francis J. Payne. New York: Dover, 1966.
  102. Searle, John R. [1980]. “Minds, brains, and programs”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 417–57.
  103. Seddon, George [1972]. “Logical possibility”. Mind (New Series) 81: 481–94.
  104. Schrödinger, Erwin [1992]. What is Life? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  105. Shutte, Augustine [2001]. Ubuntu: An Ethic for a New South Africa. Pietermaritzburg: Cluster Publications.
  106. Slater, Mel, and Maria V. Sanchez-Vives [2016]. “Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality”. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3: 1–47.
  107. Smith, A. David [2010]. “Disjunctivism and illusion”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80: 384–410.
  108. Spence, Charles, Maurizio Mancini, and Gijs Huisman [2019]. “Digital commensality: Eating and drinking in the company of technology”. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 1–16.
  109. Sutherland, Ivan E. [1965]. “The ultimate display”. In Proceedings of the Congress of the International Federation of Information Processing. New York: Association for Computing Machinery: 506–8. http://worrydream.com/refs/Sutherland%20-%20The%20Ultimate%20Display.pdf
  110. Tavinor, Grant [2019]. “Towards an analysis of virtual realism”. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2019 Conference: Game, Play and the Emerging Ludo-Mix: 1–10. https://dl.digra.org/index.php/dl/article/view/1062/1062
  111. Thompson, Evan [2007]. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  112. Turing, Alan M. [1950]. “Computing machinery and intelligence”. Mind 59: 433–60.
  113. Ullman, Ellen [1997]. Close to the Machine: Technophilia and its Discontents. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
  114. Watercutter, Angela [2023]. “Keanu will never surrender to the machines”. Wired, March. https://www.wired.com/story/keanu-reeves-chad-stahelski-interview/.
  115. Wheeler, Billy [2022]. “Causation in a virtual world: A mechanistic approach”. Philosophy & Technology 35: 1–26.
  116. Wittgenstein, Ludwig [1958]. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  117. Worrall, John [1989]. “Structural realism: The best of both worlds?” Dialectica 43: 99–124.
  118. Zerilli, John [2022]. “From dualism to deism: A philosopher comes full circle”. Science 375:
  119. Zuboff, Shoshana [2019]. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2024-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2182-2875 | Journal ISSN: 0873-626X
Language: English, Portuguese
Page range: 37 - 66
Published on: Jan 20, 2026
Published by: University of Lisbon
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Marc Champagne, published by University of Lisbon
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.