References
- Clarke, Roger [2013]. “Belief is credence one (in context)”. Philosophers’ Imprint 13: 1–18.
- Clarke, Roger [2017]. “Preface writers are consistent”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98: 362–81.
- Dodd, Dylan [2017]. “Belief and certainty”. Synthese 194: 4597–621.
- Dretske, Fred [1988]. Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- Fantl, Jeremy & McGrath, Matthew [2009]. Knowledge in An Uncertain World. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Fodor, Jerry A. [1981]. Representations: Philosophical Essays on The Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- Foley, Richard [1992]. “The epistemology of beliefs and the epistemology of degrees of belief”. American Philosophy Quarterly 29: 111–24.
- Ganson, Dorit [2008]. “Evidentialism and pragmatic constraints on outright belief”. Philosophical Studies 139: 441–58.
- Greco, Daniel [2015]. “How I learned to stop worrying and love probability 1”. Philosophical Perspectives 29: 179–201.
- Hawthorne, James & Bovens, Luc [1999]. “The preface, the lottery, and the logic of belief”. Mind 108: 241–64.
- Jackson, Elizabeth G. [2020]. “The relationship between belief and credence”. Philosophy Compass 15: 1–13.
- Kauss, Dominik [2021]. “Context-sensitivity and the Preface Paradox for credence”. Synthese 199: 7303–20.
- Keefe, Rosanna [2000]. Theories of Vagueness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Keefe, Rosanna [2021]. “Prefaces, sorites and guides to reasoning”. In Conditionals, Paradox and Probability: Themes from the Philosophy of Dorothy Edgington, edited by L. Walters & J. Hawthorne. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 212–26.
- Makinson, D. C. [1965]. “The paradox of the preface”. Analysis 25: 205–7.
- Moon, Andrew [2025]. “Certainty”. In The Blackwell Companion to Epistemology (3rd edition), edited by K. Sylvan, E. Sosa, J. Dancy & M. Steup. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Moss, Sarah [2019]. “Full belief and loose speech”. Philosophical Review 128: 255–91.
- Nagel, Jennifer [2021]. “The psychological dimension of the Lottery Paradox”. In The Lottery Paradox, edited by Igor Douven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Quilty-Dunn, Jake & Mandelbaum, Eric [2018]. “Against dispositionalism: Belief in cognitive science”. Philosophical Studies 175: 2353–72.
- Ross, Jacob & Schroeder, Mark [2014]. “Belief, credence, and pragmatic encroachment”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88: 259–88.
- Schwitzgebel, Eric [2001]. “In-between believing”. Philosophical Quarterly 51: 76–82
- Unger, Peter [1975]. Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Unger, Peter [1979]. “There are no ordinary things”. Synthese 41: 117–54.
- Weatherson, Brian [2005]. “Can we do without pragmatic encroachment”. Philosophical Perspectives 19: 417–43.
- Zardini, Elia [2012]. “Luminosity and vagueness”. Dialectica 66: 375–410.