Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Open Access
|Nov 2024

References

  1. Baddeley, Alan [1986]. Working Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  2. Bartolo, Angela, Rossetti, Yves, Revol, Patrice, Urquizar, Christian, Pisella, Laure and Coello, Yan [2018]. “Reachability judgement in optic ataxia: Effect of peripheral vision on hand and target perception in depth”. Cortex 98: 102–13.
  3. Barwich, Ann-Sophie [2020]. Smellosopohy: What the Nose Tells the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Bealer, George [2002]. “Modal epistemology and the rationalist renaissance”. In Conceivability and possibility, edited by T. S. Gendler and J. Hawthorne. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 71–125.
  5. BonJour, Laurence [1985]. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  6. Brogaard, Berit and Chomanski, Bartek [2015]. “Cognitive Penetrability and High-Level properties in perception: Unrelated phenomena?”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96: 469–86.
  7. Burge, Tyler [2003]. “Perceptual entitlement”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67: 503–48.
  8. Buschman, J. Timothy, Siegel, Markus, Roy, Jefferson and Miller, K. Earl [2011]. “Neural substrates of cognitive capacity limitations”. Proceedings from the National Academy of Sciences 108: 11252–5.
  9. Collins, Alan and Quillian, M Ross [1969]. “Retrieval time from semantic memory”. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8: 240–7.
  10. Cosmides, Leda and Tooby, John [2006]. “Evolutionary psychology, moral heuristics, and the law”. In Heuristics and the Law, edited by G. Gigerenzer and C. Engel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  11. de Vignemont, Frédérique [2021]. “Peripersonal perception in action”. Synthese 198: 4027–44.
  12. DeCasper, Anthony and Fifer, William [1980]. “Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices”. Science 208: 1174–6.
  13. Ellis, Rob and Tucker, Mike [2000]. “Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects”. British Journal of Psychology 91: 451–71.
  14. Fischer, Bob and Leon, Felipe [2017]. Modal Epistemology After Rationalism. Springer.
  15. Fodor, Jerry [1983]. Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  16. Ghijsen, Harmen [2021]. “Predictive processing and foundationalism about perception”. Synthese 198: 1751–69.
  17. Gibson, J. James [1979]. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  18. Goldman, I. Alvin [1979]. “What is justified belief?”. In Justification and Knowledge, edited by G. Pappas. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  19. Goldstone, L. Robert [1998]. “Perceptual learning”. Annual Review of Psychology 49: 585–612.
  20. Graham, J. Peter [2012]. “Epistemic entitlement”. Noûs 46: 449–83.
  21. Graziano, S. A. Michael, Reiss, A. J. Lina and Gross, G. Charles [1999]. “A neuronal representation of the location of nearby sounds”. Nature 397: 428–30.
  22. Graziano, S. A. Michael, Hu, Tiao Xin, and Gross, G. Charles [1997]. “Visuospatial properties of ventral premotor cortex”. Journal of Neurophysiology 77: 2268–92.
  23. Heck, J. Richard [2000]. “Nonconceptual content and the space of reasons”. Philosophical Review 109: 483–523.
  24. Heras-Escribano, Manuel [2019]. The Philosophy of Affordances. Palgrave Macmillan.
  25. Kestenbaum, Roberta, Termine, Nancy and Spelke, Elizabeth [1987]. “Perception of objects and object boundaries by 3-month-old infants”. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 5: 367–83.
  26. Kozma, Petra, Kovacs, Ilona and Benedek, Gyorgy [2001]. “Normal and abnormal development of visual functions in children”. Acta Biologica Szegediensis 45: 1–423.
  27. Lyons, C. Jack [2001]. “Carving the mind at its (not necessarily modular) joints”. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52: 277–302.
  28. Lyons, C. Jack [2009]. Perception and Basic Beliefs. New York: Oxford University Press.
  29. Lyons, C. Jack [2011]. “Circularity, reliability, and cognitive penetrability of perception”. Philosophical Issues 21: 289–311.
  30. Lyons, C. Jack [2014]. “The epistemological import of morphological content”. Philosophical Studies 169: 537–47.
  31. Lyons, C. Jack [2016]. “Unconscious evidence” Philosophical Issues 26: 243–62.
  32. Marr, David [1982]. Vision. London: Allen and Unwin.
  33. Masrour, Farid [2011]. “Is perceptual phenomenology thin?”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83: 366–97.
  34. McGinn, Colin [1996]. “Another look at color”. Journal of Philosophy 93: 537–53.
  35. Nanay, Bence [2011]. “Do we sense modality with our sense modality”. Ratio 24: 299–310.
  36. Nanay, Bence [2012]. “Action-oriented perception”. European Journal of Philosophy 20: 430–46.
  37. Nolan, Daniel [2017]. “Naturalized modal epistemology”. In Modal Epistemology After Rationalism, edited by B. Fischer and F. Leon. Springer: 7–28.
  38. Omoge, Michael [2022]. “On the immediate mental antecedent of action”. Philosophical Exploration 26: 276–92.
  39. Onishi, H. Kristine and Baillargeon, Renée [2005]. “Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs?”. Science 308: 255–8.
  40. Pryor, James [2005]. “There is immediate justification”. In Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, edited by M. Steup, & J. Turri. Oxford: Blackwell: 181–202.
  41. Pylyshyn, Zenon [1999]. “Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 341–65.
  42. Roca-Royes, Sonia [2017]. “Similarity and possibility: An Epistemology of de re Possibility for Concrete Entities”. In B. Fischer and F. Leon, 221–45.
  43. Siegel, Susanna [2012]. “Cognitive penetrability and perceptual justification”. Noûs 46: 201–22.
  44. Siegel, Susanna [2014]. “Affordances and the contents of perception”. In Does Perception Have Content?, edited by B. Brogaard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  45. Silins, Nicholas [2013]. “The significance of high-level content”. Philosophical Studies 162: 13–33.
  46. Slater, Alan, Mattock, Anne and Brown, Elizabeth [1990]. “Size constancy at birth: Newborn infants’ responses to retinal and real size”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 49: 314–22.
  47. Smolensky, Paul [1988]. “On the proper treatment of connectionism”. The Behavioral & Brain Sciences 11: 1–74.
  48. Sosa, Ernest [1993]. “Proper functionalism and virtue epistemology”. Noûs 27: 51–65.
  49. Strohminger, Margot [2015]. “Perceptual knowledge of nonactual possibilities”. Philosophical Perspectives 29: 363–75.
  50. Teller, Y Davida [1998]. “Spatial and temporal aspects of infant color vision”. Vision Research 38: 3275–82.
  51. Tröster, Heinrich and Brambring, Michael [1993]. “Early motor development in blind infants”. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 14: 83–106.
  52. van Inwagen, Peter [1998]. “Modal epistemology”. Philosophical Studies 92: 67–84.
  53. Vetter, Barbara [2018]. “Perceiving potentiality: A metaphysics for affordances”. Topoi 1–31.
  54. Vogel, Jonathan [2000]. “Reliabilism leveled”. The Journal of Philosophy 97: 602–23.
  55. Von Hofsten, Claes [1979]. “Development of visually guided reaching: The approach phase”. Journal of Human Movement Studies 5: 160–78.
  56. Wallner, Michael [2020]. “The structure of essentialist explanations of necessity”. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 9: 4–13.
  57. Williamson, Timothy [2017]. “Modal science”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46: 453–92.
  58. Zimmermann, Anita, Monteiro de Carvalho, Keila, Atihe, Camila, Zimmermann, Sara, and Leme de Moura Ribeiro, Valeriana [2019]. “Visual development in children aged 0 to 6 years”. Arquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia 82: 173–5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2023-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2182-2875 | Journal ISSN: 0873-626X
Language: English, Portuguese
Page range: 223 - 249
Published on: Nov 11, 2024
Published by: University of Lisbon
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2024 Michael Omoge, published by University of Lisbon
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.