References
- Berto, Francesco and Schoonen, Tom [2018]. “Conceivability and possibility: Some dilemmas for Humeans”. Synthese 195: 2697–715.
- Blackburn, Simon [1986]. “Morals and Modals”. In Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford: OUP: 52–74.
- Bueno, Otávio and Shalkowski, Scott [2015]. “Modalism and theoretical virtues: Toward an epistemology of modality”. Philosophical Studies 172: 671–89.
- Bueno, Otávio and Shalkowski, Scott [2020]. The Routledge Handbook of Modality. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Craig, Edward [1985]. “Arithmetic and fact”. In Essays in Analysis, edited by I. Hacking. Cambridge: CUP: 89–112.
- Dohrn, Daniel [2019]. “Modal epistemology made concrete”. Philosophical Studies 176: 2455–75.
- Fischer, Robert W. [2015]. “Theory selection in modal epistemology”. ’American Philosophical Quarterly 52: 381–95.
- Fischer, Robert W. [2017]. “Modal empiricism: Objection, reply, proposal”. In Modal Epistemology After Rationalism, edited by B. Fischer & F. Leon. Berlin: Springer (Synthese Library): 263–80.
- Goff, Philip [2021]. “Essentialist modal rationalism”. Synthese 198: S2019–27.
- Hale, Bob [2003]. “Knowledge of possibility and of necessity”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103: 1–20.
- Hale, Bob [2013]. Necessary Beings: An Essay on Ontology, Modality, and the Relations Between Them. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hawke, Peter [2011]. “van Inwagen’s modal skepticism”. Philosophical Studies 153: 351–64.
- Hawke, Peter [2017]. “Can modal skepticism defeat Humean skepticism?”. Modal Epistemology After Rationalism, edited by B. Fischer & F. Leon. Berlin: Springer (Synthese Library): 281–308.
- Heylen, Jan and Morales Carbonell, Felipe [2023]. “Concepts of knowability”. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso 23: 287–308.
- Jago, Mark [2021]. “Knowing how things might have been”. Synthese 198: S1981–99.
- Kment, Boris [2021]. “Essence and modal knowledge”. Synthese 198: S1957–79.
- Leon, Felipe [2017]. “From modal skepticism to modal empiricism”. In Modal Epistemology After Rationalism, edited by B. Fischer & F. Leon. Berlin: Springer (Synthese Library): 247–61.
- Lewis, David [1986]. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell Press.
- Lowe, E. Jonathan [2008]. “Two notions of being: Entity and essence”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62: 23–48.
- Lowe, E. Jonathan [2012]. “What is the source of our knowledge of modal truths?”. Mind 121: 919–50.
- Mackie, Penelope [2006]. How Things Might Have Been: Individuals, Kinds, and Essential Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Mallozzi, Antonella, Vaidya, Anand and Wallner, Michael [2021]. “The epistemology of modality”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta.https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/modalityepistemology/
- Mallozzi, Antonella [2021a]. “Putting modal metaphysics first”. Synthese 198: 1937–56.
- Mallozzi, Antonella [2021b]. “Two notions of metaphysical modality”. Synthese 198: 1387–408.
- Martínez, Manolo [2013]. “Ideal negative conceivability and the halting problem”. Erkenntnis 78: 979–90.
- Nolan, Daniel [2017]. “Naturalised modal epistemology”. In Modal Epistemology After Rationalism, edited by R. Fischer and F. Leon. Dordrecht: Synthese Library Series: 7–27.
- Peacocke, Chistopher [2020]. “Epistemology, the constitutive, and the principle-based account of modality”. In The Routledge Handbook of Modality, edited by O. Bueno and S. A. Shalkowski: 180–7.
- Prelević, Duško and Vaidya, Anand [2023]. The Epistemology of Modality and Philosophical Methodology. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Rasmussen, Joshua [2014]. “Continuity as a guide to possibility”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92/3: 525–38.
- Roca-Royes, Sonia [2007]. “Mind-independence and modal empiricism”. In Proceedings of the 4th Latin Meeting in Analytic Philosophy (LMAP-2007), edited by Penco C, Vignolo M, Ottonelli & V, Amoretti C. Genoa, Italy: 117–35.
- Roca-Royes, Sonia [2010]. “Modal epistemology, modal concepts and the integration challenge”. Dialectica 64: 335–61. DOI: doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.2010.01236.x
- Roca-Royes, Sonia [2011]. “Conceivability and de re modal knowledge”. Noûs 45/1: 25–49.
- Roca-Royes, Sonia [2017]. “Similarity and possibility: an epistemology of de re possibility for concrete entities”. In Modal Epistemology After Rationalism, edited by R. Fischer and F. Leon. Dordrecht: Synthese Library Series: 221–45.
- Roca-Royes, Sonia [2018]. “Rethinking the epistemology of modality for abstracta”. In Being Necessary: Themes of Ontology and Modality from the Work of Bob Hale, edited by I. Fred-Rivera & J. Leech. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 245–66.
- Roca-Royes, Sonia [2019]. “Concepts and the epistemology of essence”. Dialectica 73: 3–29.
- Roca-Royes, Sonia [2021]. ‘The epistemology of modality”. In The Routledge Handbook of Metametaphysics, edited by R. Bliss and J. Miller: 364–75.
- Sgaravatti, Daniel [2016]. “Is knowledge of essence required for thinking about something?”. Dialectica 70: 217–28.
- Sjölin Wirling, Ylwa and Grüne-Yanoff, Till [2021]. “The epistemology of modal modelling”. Philosophy Compass 16, e12775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12775
- Sjölin Wirling, Ylwa [2020]. “Non-uniformism about the epistemology of modality: Strong and weak”. Analytic Philosophy 61: 152–73.
- Sjölin Wirling, Ylwa [2021]. “Extending similarity-based epistemology of modality with models”. Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 8: 570–94.
- Strohminger, Margot. [2015]. “Perceptual knowledge of nonactual possibilities”. Philosophical Perspectives, Epistemology 29: 363–75.
- Tahko, Tuomas E. [2017]. “Empirically informed modal rationalism”. In Modal Epistemology After Rationalism, edited by R. Fischer and F. Leon. Dordrecht: Synthese Library Series: 29–45.
- Tahko, Tuomas E. [2018]. “The epistemology of essence”. In Ontology, Modality, Mind: Themes from the Metaphysics of E. J. Lowe, edited by A. Carruth, S. C. Gibb & J. Heil. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 93–110.
- Thomasson, L. Amie [2020]. Norms and Necessity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Thomasson, L. Amie [2021]. “How can we come to know metaphysical modal truths?”. Synthese 198: S2077–106.
- Vaidya, Anand [2008]. “Modal rationalism and modal monism”. Erkenntnis 68: 191–212.
- Vaidya, Anand and Wallner, Michael [2021]. “The epistemology of modality and the problem of modal epistemic friction”. Synthese 198: S1909–35.
- van Inwagen, Peter [1998]. “Modal epistemology”. Philosophical Studies 92: 67–84.
- Vetter, Barbara [2016]. “Williamsonian modal epistemology, possibility-based”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46: 766–95.
- Vetter, Barbara [2023]. “An Agency-Based Approach to Modal Epistemology”. In The Epistemology of Modality and Philosophical Methodology, edited by D. Prelević & A. Vaidya. New York, NY: Routledge: 44–69.
- Williamson, Timothy [2007]. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Worley, Sara [2003]. “Conceivability, possibility and physicalism”. Analysis 63: 15–23.