Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Inductive Knowability of the Modal

Open Access
|Nov 2024

References

  1. Berto, Francesco and Schoonen, Tom [2018]. “Conceivability and possibility: Some dilemmas for Humeans”. Synthese 195: 2697–715.
  2. Blackburn, Simon [1986]. “Morals and Modals”. In Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford: OUP: 52–74.
  3. Bueno, Otávio and Shalkowski, Scott [2015]. “Modalism and theoretical virtues: Toward an epistemology of modality”. Philosophical Studies 172: 671–89.
  4. Bueno, Otávio and Shalkowski, Scott [2020]. The Routledge Handbook of Modality. New York, NY: Routledge.
  5. Craig, Edward [1985]. “Arithmetic and fact”. In Essays in Analysis, edited by I. Hacking. Cambridge: CUP: 89–112.
  6. Dohrn, Daniel [2019]. “Modal epistemology made concrete”. Philosophical Studies 176: 2455–75.
  7. Fischer, Robert W. [2015]. “Theory selection in modal epistemology”. American Philosophical Quarterly 52: 381–95.
  8. Fischer, Robert W. [2017]. “Modal empiricism: Objection, reply, proposal”. In Modal Epistemology After Rationalism, edited by B. Fischer & F. Leon. Berlin: Springer (Synthese Library): 263–80.
  9. Goff, Philip [2021]. “Essentialist modal rationalism”. Synthese 198: S2019–27.
  10. Hale, Bob [2003]. “Knowledge of possibility and of necessity”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103: 1–20.
  11. Hale, Bob [2013]. Necessary Beings: An Essay on Ontology, Modality, and the Relations Between Them. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Hawke, Peter [2011]. “van Inwagen’s modal skepticism”. Philosophical Studies 153: 351–64.
  13. Hawke, Peter [2017]. “Can modal skepticism defeat Humean skepticism?”. Modal Epistemology After Rationalism, edited by B. Fischer & F. Leon. Berlin: Springer (Synthese Library): 281–308.
  14. Heylen, Jan and Morales Carbonell, Felipe [2023]. “Concepts of knowability”. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso 23: 287–308.
  15. Jago, Mark [2021]. “Knowing how things might have been”. Synthese 198: S1981–99.
  16. Kment, Boris [2021]. “Essence and modal knowledge”. Synthese 198: S1957–79.
  17. Leon, Felipe [2017]. “From modal skepticism to modal empiricism”. In Modal Epistemology After Rationalism, edited by B. Fischer & F. Leon. Berlin: Springer (Synthese Library): 247–61.
  18. Lewis, David [1986]. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell Press.
  19. Lowe, E. Jonathan [2008]. “Two notions of being: Entity and essence”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62: 23–48.
  20. Lowe, E. Jonathan [2012]. “What is the source of our knowledge of modal truths?”. Mind 121: 919–50.
  21. Mackie, Penelope [2006]. How Things Might Have Been: Individuals, Kinds, and Essential Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Mallozzi, Antonella, Vaidya, Anand and Wallner, Michael [2021]. “The epistemology of modality”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta.https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/modalityepistemology/
  23. Mallozzi, Antonella [2021a]. “Putting modal metaphysics first”. Synthese 198: 1937–56.
  24. Mallozzi, Antonella [2021b]. “Two notions of metaphysical modality”. Synthese 198: 1387–408.
  25. Martínez, Manolo [2013]. “Ideal negative conceivability and the halting problem”. Erkenntnis 78: 979–90.
  26. Nolan, Daniel [2017]. “Naturalised modal epistemology”. In Modal Epistemology After Rationalism, edited by R. Fischer and F. Leon. Dordrecht: Synthese Library Series: 7–27.
  27. Peacocke, Chistopher [2020]. “Epistemology, the constitutive, and the principle-based account of modality”. In The Routledge Handbook of Modality, edited by O. Bueno and S. A. Shalkowski: 180–7.
  28. Prelević, Duško and Vaidya, Anand [2023]. The Epistemology of Modality and Philosophical Methodology. New York, NY: Routledge.
  29. Rasmussen, Joshua [2014]. “Continuity as a guide to possibility”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92/3: 525–38.
  30. Roca-Royes, Sonia [2007]. “Mind-independence and modal empiricism”. In Proceedings of the 4th Latin Meeting in Analytic Philosophy (LMAP-2007), edited by Penco C, Vignolo M, Ottonelli & V, Amoretti C. Genoa, Italy: 117–35.
  31. Roca-Royes, Sonia [2010]. “Modal epistemology, modal concepts and the integration challenge”. Dialectica 64: 335–61. DOI: doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.2010.01236.x
  32. Roca-Royes, Sonia [2011]. “Conceivability and de re modal knowledge”. Noûs 45/1: 25–49.
  33. Roca-Royes, Sonia [2017]. “Similarity and possibility: an epistemology of de re possibility for concrete entities”. In Modal Epistemology After Rationalism, edited by R. Fischer and F. Leon. Dordrecht: Synthese Library Series: 221–45.
  34. Roca-Royes, Sonia [2018]. “Rethinking the epistemology of modality for abstracta”. In Being Necessary: Themes of Ontology and Modality from the Work of Bob Hale, edited by I. Fred-Rivera & J. Leech. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 245–66.
  35. Roca-Royes, Sonia [2019]. “Concepts and the epistemology of essence”. Dialectica 73: 3–29.
  36. Roca-Royes, Sonia [2021]. ‘The epistemology of modality”. In The Routledge Handbook of Metametaphysics, edited by R. Bliss and J. Miller: 364–75.
  37. Sgaravatti, Daniel [2016]. “Is knowledge of essence required for thinking about something?”. Dialectica 70: 217–28.
  38. Sjölin Wirling, Ylwa and Grüne-Yanoff, Till [2021]. “The epistemology of modal modelling”. Philosophy Compass 16, e12775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12775
  39. Sjölin Wirling, Ylwa [2020]. “Non-uniformism about the epistemology of modality: Strong and weak”. Analytic Philosophy 61: 152–73.
  40. Sjölin Wirling, Ylwa [2021]. “Extending similarity-based epistemology of modality with models”. Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 8: 570–94.
  41. Strohminger, Margot. [2015]. “Perceptual knowledge of nonactual possibilities”. Philosophical Perspectives, Epistemology 29: 363–75.
  42. Tahko, Tuomas E. [2017]. “Empirically informed modal rationalism”. In Modal Epistemology After Rationalism, edited by R. Fischer and F. Leon. Dordrecht: Synthese Library Series: 29–45.
  43. Tahko, Tuomas E. [2018]. “The epistemology of essence”. In Ontology, Modality, Mind: Themes from the Metaphysics of E. J. Lowe, edited by A. Carruth, S. C. Gibb & J. Heil. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 93–110.
  44. Thomasson, L. Amie [2020]. Norms and Necessity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  45. Thomasson, L. Amie [2021]. “How can we come to know metaphysical modal truths?”. Synthese 198: S2077–106.
  46. Vaidya, Anand [2008]. “Modal rationalism and modal monism”. Erkenntnis 68: 191–212.
  47. Vaidya, Anand and Wallner, Michael [2021]. “The epistemology of modality and the problem of modal epistemic friction”. Synthese 198: S1909–35.
  48. van Inwagen, Peter [1998]. “Modal epistemology”. Philosophical Studies 92: 67–84.
  49. Vetter, Barbara [2016]. “Williamsonian modal epistemology, possibility-based”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46: 766–95.
  50. Vetter, Barbara [2023]. “An Agency-Based Approach to Modal Epistemology”. In The Epistemology of Modality and Philosophical Methodology, edited by D. Prelević & A. Vaidya. New York, NY: Routledge: 44–69.
  51. Williamson, Timothy [2007]. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  52. Worley, Sara [2003]. “Conceivability, possibility and physicalism”. Analysis 63: 15–23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2023-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2182-2875 | Journal ISSN: 0873-626X
Language: English, Portuguese
Page range: 151 - 178
Published on: Nov 11, 2024
Published by: University of Lisbon
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2024 Sonia Roca-Royes, published by University of Lisbon
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.