Plenty to Come: Making Sense of Correia &amp; Rosenkranz’s Growing Block

Deng, Natalja

doi:10.2478/disp-2021-0019

References

Cameron, Ross P. 2016. “On characterizing the Presentism/Eternalism and Actualism/Possibilism debates”. Analytic Philosophy 57(2): 110–40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Correia, Fabrice, and Rosenkranz, Sven. 2018. Nothing to Come: A Defence of the Growing Block Theory of Time. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Correia, Fabrice, and Rosenkranz, Sven. 2020a. “The formalities of temporaryism without presentness”. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 61(2): 181–202.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Correia, Fabrice, and Rosenkranz, Sven. 2020b. “Temporal existence and temporal location”. Philosophical Studies 177(7): 1999–2011.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deasy, Daniel. 2019. “The triviality argument against presentism”. Synthese 196(8): 3369–88.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deng, Natalja. 2018. “What is temporal ontology?”. Philosophical Studies 175(3): 793–807.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Meyer, Ulrich. 2005. “The presentist’s dilemma”. Philosophical Studies 122(3): 213–25.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prior, Arthur N., Hasle, Per F. V., Copeland, Jack, Øhrstrøm, Peter and Braüner, Torben. 2003. Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sider, Ted. 2001. Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Torrengo, Giuliano. 2012. “Time and simple existence”. Metaphysica 13(2) 125–30.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Plenty to Come: Making Sense of Correia & Rosenkranz’s Growing Block

References

Paradigm

My account