Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Is There an Aesthetics of Political Song?

Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. Bell, Clive. 1914. Art. London: Frederick A. Stokes Co.
  2. Berger, John. 1972. Ways of Seeing. New York: Penguin.
  3. Bicknell, Jeanette. 2015. Philosophy of Song and Singing: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
  4. Black, Max. 1955. “Metaphor”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 54 (1954–5): 273–94.10.1093/aristotelian/55.1.273
  5. Carroll, Noël. 2016. “Art appreciation”. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 50(4): 1–14.10.5406/jaesteduc.50.4.0001
  6. Danto, Arthur. 1981. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  7. Davidson, Donald. 1978. “What metaphors mean”. Critical Inquiry, 5(1): 31–47.10.1086/447971
  8. Davies, Stephen. 1991. Definitions of Art. New York: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501721182
  9. Davies, Stephen. 2012. “On defining music”. The Monist 95(4): 535–5.10.5840/monist201295427
  10. Dickie, George. 1964. “The myth of the aesthetic attitude”. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1(1): 56–65.
  11. Gioia, Ted. 2006. Work Songs. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822387688
  12. Goodman, Nelson. 1976. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing.10.5040/9781350928541
  13. Kulvicki, John. 2020. Modeling the Meanings of Pictures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198847472.001.0001
  14. Levinson, Jerrold. 2005. “Erotic art and pornographic pictures”. Philosophy and Literature 29(1): 228–40.10.1353/phl.2005.0009
  15. Levinson, Jerrold. 1995. “Messages in art”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 73(2): 184–98.10.1080/00048409512346521
  16. Peacocke, Christopher. 2009. “The perception of music: sources of significance”. British Journal of Aesthetics, 49(3): 257–75.10.1093/aesthj/ayp016
  17. Putnam, Hilary. 2004. Ethics Without Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.1515/9780674042391
  18. Scruton, Roger. 1997. The Aesthetics of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  19. Sibley, Frank. 1959. “Aesthetic concepts”. Philosophical Review, 68(4): 421–50.10.2307/2182490
  20. Stein, Gertrude. 1933. The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas. New York: Harcourt Brace.
  21. Toorn, Pieter C. van den. 1996. Music, Politics and the Academy. University of California Press.
  22. Vacca & Moore (eds.). 2014. Legacies of Ewan MacColl: The Last Interview. New York: Routledge.
  23. Walton, Kendall. 1970. “Categories of art”. Philosophical Review, 79(3): 334–67.10.2307/2183933
  24. Wilde, Oscar. 1905. Intentions: The Decay of Lying, Pen Pencil and Poison, The Critic as Artist. The Truth of Masks. New York: Brentano’s.
  25. Young, James. 2001. Art and Knowledge. London & New York: Routledge.
  26. Zangwill, Nick. 2015. Music and Aesthetic Reality: Formalism and the Limits of Description. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203073797
  27. Zemach, Eddy. 1997. Real Beauty. Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2021-0016 | Journal eISSN: 2182-2875 | Journal ISSN: 0873-626X
Language: English, Portuguese
Page range: 299 - 328
Published on: Nov 28, 2022
Published by: University of Lisbon
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Vítor Guerreiro, published by University of Lisbon
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.