Logic in Natural Language: Commitments and Constraints
By:
References
- Baumgartner, M. and Timm L. 2008. Adequate formalization. Synthese 164: 93–115.10.1007/s11229-007-9218-1
- Brandom, R. 1998. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Brun, G. 2008. Formalization and the objects of logic. Erkenntnis 69 (1): 1–30.10.1007/s10670-008-9112-3
- Brun, G. 2014. Reconstructing arguments. Formalization and reflective equilibrium. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 17: 94–129.10.30965/26664275-01701006
- Brun, G. 2017. Conceptual re-engineering: from explication to reflective equilibrium. Synthese, 1–30.
- Brun, G. 2018. Logical expressivism, logical theory and the critique of inferences. Synthese, 1–17.
- Carnap, R. 1937. The Logical Syntax of Language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Carnap, R. 1962. Logical Foundations of Probability. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Dutilh Novaes, C. 2012. Formal Languages in Logic: A Philosophical and Cognitive Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139108010
- Frege, G. 1967. Begriffsschrift. In From Frege to Gödel, edited by Jan van Heijenoort, 1–82. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
- Goodman, N. 1983. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. 4th ed. Harvard University Press.
- Iacona, A. 2018. Logical Form. Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-74154-3
- Kaplan, D. 1989. Demonstratives: an essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In Themes from Kaplan, 481–566. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Peregrin, J. and Svoboda, V. 2013. Criteria for logical formalization. Synthese 190(14): 2897–924.10.1007/s11229-012-0104-0
- Peregrin, J. and Svoboda, V. 2017. Reflective Equilibrium and the Principles of Logical Analysis: Understanding the Laws of Logic. Routledge.10.4324/9781315453934
- Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Resnik, M. D. 1985. Logic: normative or descriptive? The ethics of belief or a branch of psychology? Philosophy of Science 52(2): 221–38.10.1086/289241
- Sagi, G. 2013. Logical Consequence: Between Formal and Natural Language. PhD Thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
- Sagi, G. 2014. Formality in logic: from logical terms to semantic constraints. Logique et Analyse 227: 259–76.10.1017/CBO9781107280991.013
- Sainsbury, M. 1993. Logical Forms. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
- Steinberger, F. 2019. Three ways in which logic might be normative. Journal of Philosophy 116(1): 5–31.10.5840/jphil201911611
- Thagard, P. 1982. From the descriptive to the normative in psychology and logic. Philosophy of Science 49(1): 24–42.10.1086/289032
- Wittgenstein, L. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by C. K. Ogden. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Woods, J. 2017. Characterizing invariance. Ergo 3: 778–807.10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.030
- Woods, J. and Michaelson, E. Building character. Manuscript.
Language: English, Portuguese
Page range: 277 - 308
Published on: Jan 29, 2021
Published by: University of Lisbon
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2021 Gil Sagi, published by University of Lisbon
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.