Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Virtual as the Digital Cover
Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. Beisbart, C. 2019. Virtual realism: really realism or only virtually so? A comment on D. J. Chalmers’s Petrus Hispanus Lectures. Disputatio 11(55): 297–331.<a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2019-0008" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/disp-2019-0008</a>
  2. Chalmers, D. J. 1994. On implementing a computation. Minds and Machines 4(4): 391–402.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974166" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/BF00974166</a>
  3. Chalmers, D. J. 1996. Does a rock implement every finite-state automaton? Synthese 108(3): 309–33.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413692" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/BF00413692</a>
  4. Chalmers, D. J. 2012. The varieties of computation: A reply. Journal of Cognitive Science (3): 211–48.<a href="https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2012.13.3.211" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.17791/jcs.2012.13.3.211</a>
  5. Chalmers, D. J. 2017. The virtual and the real. Disputatio 9(46): 309–52.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/disp-2017-0009" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/disp-2017-0009</a>
  6. Chalmers, D. J. 2019a. Three puzzles about spatial experience. In Blockheads! Essays on Ned Block’s Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness, ed. by A. Pautz and D. Stoljar. MIT Press.
  7. Chalmers, D. J. 2019b. Idealism and the mind-body problem. In The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism, ed. by William Seager. New York: Routledge.<a href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717708-28" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4324/9781315717708-28</a>
  8. Green, E. J.; and Rabin, G.O. 2019. Use your illusion: Spatial functionalism, vision science, and the case against global skepticism. Analytic Philosophy.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12163" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/phib.12163</a>
  9. Juul, J. 2019. Virtual reality: fictional all the way down. Disputatio 11(55): 333–43.<a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2019-0010" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/disp-2019-0010</a>
  10. Langton, R. 1998. Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford University Press.
  11. Lewis, D. 2009. Ramseyan humility. In Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism, ed. by D. Braddon-Mitchell and Robert Nola. MIT Press.<a href="https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012560.003.0009" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.7551/mitpress/9780262012560.003.0009</a>
  12. Ludlow, P. 2019. The social furniture of virtual worlds. Disputatio 11(55): 345–69.<a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2019-0009" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/disp-2019-0009</a>
  13. McDonnell, N.; and Wildman, N. 2019. Virtual reality: digital or fictional? Disputatio 11(55): 371–97.<a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2019-0004" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/disp-2019-0004</a>
  14. Ney, A. 2019. On phenomenal functionalism about the properties of virtual and non-virtual objects. Disputatio 11(55): 399–410.<a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2019-0005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/disp-2019-0005</a>
  15. Nozick, N. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books.
  16. Schaffer, J. 2015. What not to multiply without necessity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93: 644–64.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2014.992447" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/00048402.2014.992447</a>
  17. Schwitzgebel, E. 2019. Kant meets cyberpunk. Disputatio 11(55): 411–35.<a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2019-0006" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/disp-2019-0006</a>
  18. Silcox, M. 2019. The transition into virtual reality. Disputatio 11(55): 437–51.<a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2019-0007" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/disp-2019-0007</a>
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2019-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2182-2875 | Journal ISSN: 0873-626X
Language: English, Portuguese
Page range: 453 - 486
Published on: Jun 8, 2020
Published by: University of Lisbon
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2020 David J. Chalmers, published by University of Lisbon
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.