Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Structures of Social Structural Explanation: Comments on Haslanger’s What is (Social) Structural Explanation? Cover

The Structures of Social Structural Explanation: Comments on Haslanger’s What is (Social) Structural Explanation?

Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. Barnes, E. 2016. Realism and social structure. Philosophical Studies 174(10): 2417–33. DOI 10.1007/s11098-016-0743-y.10.1007/s11098-016-0743-y
  2. Belnap, N.; and Steel, T. 1976. The Logic of Questions and Answers. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  3. Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–67.
  4. Cudd, A. 2006. Analyzing Oppression. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195187431.001.0001
  5. Dorr, Cian; and Hawthorne, John. 2014. Semantic plasticity and speech reports. Philosophical Review 123(3): 281–338.10.1215/00318108-2683531
  6. Dretske, F. 1988. Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2927.001.0001
  7. Epstein, B. 2017. What are social groups? Their metaphysics and how to classify them. Synthese. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1387-y10.1007/s11229-017-1387-y
  8. Epstein, B. 2015. The Ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199381104.001.0001
  9. Garfinkel, A. 1981. Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  10. Haslanger, S. 2014a. Social meaning and philosophical method. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 88: 16–37.
  11. Haslanger, S. 2014b. Race, intersectionality, and method: a reply to critics. Philosophical Studies 171: 109–19.10.1007/s11098-013-0244-1
  12. Haslanger, S. 2016. What is (social) structural explanation? Philosophical Studies 173: 113–30.10.1007/s11098-014-0434-5
  13. Haslanger, S. 2015. Theorizing with a purpose. In Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice (History and Philosophy of Biology), ed. by Catherine Kendig, pp. 129–145. Routledge.
  14. Jones, K. 2014. Intersectionality and ameliorative analyses of race and gender. Philosophical Studies 171: 99–107.10.1007/s11098-013-0245-0
  15. Katz, J.J. 1972. Semantic Theory. New York: Harper and Row.
  16. Keenan, Edward L.; and Hull, Robert D. 1973. The logical presuppositions of questions and answers. In Präsuppositionen in Philosophie und Linguistik, ed. by J. S. Petöfi and D. Franck, pp. 441–66. Frankfurt: Athenäum.
  17. Kratzer, A. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The Generic Book, ed. by G. Carlson and J. Pelletier. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Okin, S. 1989. Justice, Gender and the Family. NY: Basic Books.10.2307/1122929
  19. Reckwitz, A. 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5(2): 243–63.10.1177/13684310222225432
  20. Roberts, C. 2011. Solving for interpretation. Ms., Ohio State University.
  21. Shapiro, S. 1997. Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2018-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2182-2875 | Journal ISSN: 0873-626X
Language: English, Portuguese
Page range: 173 - 199
Published on: Jun 20, 2019
Published by: University of Lisbon
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Rachel Katharine Sterken, published by University of Lisbon
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.