Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The Worst and the Best of Propaganda

Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. Anderson, L. 2018. Calling, addressing, and appropriation. In Bad Words. Philosophical Perspectives on Slurs, ed. by D. Sosa. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 6–28.
  2. Bach, K. 1994. Conversational impliciture. Mind and Language 9: 124–62.10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.x
  3. Bianchi, C. 2014. Slurs and appropriation: an echoic account. Journal of Pragmatics 66: 35–44.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.009
  4. Bolinger, Jorgensen R. 2017. The pragmatics of slurs. Noûs 51(3): 439–462.10.1111/nous.12090
  5. Camp, E. 2013. Slurring Perspectives. Analytic Philosophy 54 (3): 330–49.10.1111/phib.12022
  6. Carston, R. 2002. Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics. Mind and Language 17 (1–2): 127–48.
  7. Cepollaro, B. 2017a. When evaluation changes—an echoic account of appropriation and variability. Journal of Pragmatics 117: 29–40.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.009
  8. Cepollaro, B. 2017b. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Slurs and Thick Terms. PhD Dissertation, PSL Research University, Institut Jean Nicod, Paris.
  9. Cepollaro, B. and Stojanovic, I. 2016. Hybrid evaluatives. Grazer Philosophische Studien 93 (3): 458–88.10.1163/18756735-09303007
  10. Cooper, R. 1983. Quantiication and Syntactic Theory. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-015-6932-3
  11. Davies, M. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990–present, available online athttp://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
  12. Del Prete, F. and Zucchi, S. 2017. A unified non monstrous semantics for third person pronouns. Semantics and Pragmatics 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.10.10.10.3765/sp.10.10
  13. Haslanger, S. 2013. Social Meaning and Philosophical Method, APA Presidential Address, handout.
  14. Jeshion, R. forthcoming. Pride and prejudiced. On the reclamation of slurs. Grazer Philosophische Studien.
  15. McCready, E. 2010. Varieties of conventional implicature. Semantics and Pragmatics 3 (8): 1–57.10.3765/sp.3.8
  16. Miščević, Nenad and Perhat, Julija. 2016. A Word which Bears a Sword. Zagreb, KruZak.
  17. Murray, S. 2014. Varieties of update. Semantics and Pragmatics 7 (2): 1–53.10.3765/sp.7.2
  18. Nunberg, G. 2018. The social life of slurs. In New Work on Speech Acts, ed. by D. Fogal, D. W. Harris and M. Moss. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 237–295.
  19. Potts, C. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273829.001.0001
  20. Potts, C. 2007. The centrality of expressive indexes. Reply to commentaries. Theoretical Linguistics 33 (2): 255–268.10.1515/TL.2007.019
  21. Rappaport, J. forthcoming. Communicating with slurs. The Philosophical Quarterly.
  22. Ritchie, K. 2017. Social identity, indexicality, and the appropriation of slurs. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 17 (2): 155–80.
  23. Sbisà, M. 1999. Ideology and the persuasive use of presupposition. In Language and Ideology. Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, ed. by J. Verschueren: 492–509. Antwerp.
  24. Stanley, J. 2015. How Propaganda Works. Princeton, Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400865802
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2018-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2182-2875 | Journal ISSN: 0873-626X
Language: English, Portuguese
Page range: 289 - 303
Published on: Dec 8, 2020
Published by: University of Lisbon
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2020 Bianca Cepollaro, Giuliano Torrengo, published by University of Lisbon
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.