Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Anderson, E. 2010. The Imperative of Integration. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  2. Bertrand, M., and Mullainathan, S. 2004. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013.10.1257/0002828042002561
  3. Beebee, H. and Saul, J. 2011. Women in Philosophy in the UK: A Report, published by the British Philosophical Association and the Society for Women in Philosophy. (<9-08/Women%20in%20Philosophy%20in%20the%20UK%20 (BPA-SWIPUK%20Report).pdf>)
  4. Blair, I. 2002. The Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3: 242-261.10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8
  5. Bradley, C. 1984. Sex bias in the evaluation of students. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23: 2, 147-153.10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00623.x
  6. Bradley, C. 1993 Sex bias in student assessment overlooked? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18: 1, 3-8.10.1080/0260293930180101
  7. Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C., & Wittenbrink, B. 2002. The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329.10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1314
  8. Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C., Wittenbrink, B., Sadler, M. S., & Keesee, T. 2007. Across the thin blue line: Police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1006–1023.10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1006
  9. Frances, B. 2005. Scepticism Comes Alive, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199282137.001.0001
  10. Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
  11. Goldin, C. and Rouse, C. 2000. Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of ‘Blind’ Auditions on Female Musicians. The American Economic Review, 90:4, 715-741.10.1257/aer.90.4.715
  12. Greenwald, A. G., Oakes, M. A. and Hoffman, H. 2003b. Targets of discrimination: Effects of race on responses to weapons holders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 399–405.10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00020-9
  13. Holroyd, J. and Sweetman, J. Forthcoming. The Heterogeneity of Implicit Bias. In Implicit Bias and Philosophy, ed. by M. Brownstein and J. Saul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Hookway, C. 1990. Scepticism, London: Routledge.
  15. Hookway, C. 2000. Truth, Rationality, and Pragmatism: Themes From Peirce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  16. Hookway, C. 2003. How to be a Virtue Epistemologist. In Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology, ed. by M. DePaul and L. Zagzebski. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252732.003.0009
  17. Hookway, C. 2010. Some Varieties of Epistemic Injustice: Response to Fricker. Episteme 7:2, 151-163.10.3366/epi.2010.0005
  18. Johnson, I. R. 2009. Just say ‘No’ (and mean it): Meaningful negation as a tool to modify automatic racial prejudice. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
  19. Kang, J. and Banaji, M. 2006. Fair Measures: A Behavioral Realist Revision of ‘Affirmative action’. California Law Review 94: 1063-1118.10.2307/20439059
  20. Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., Moll, J., Hermsen, S. and Russin, A. 2000. Just say no (to stereotyping): effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 , 871–888.10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.871
  21. Legault, L., Gutsell, J., and Inzlicht, M. 2011. Ironic Effects of Antiprejudice Messages: How Motivational Interventions Can Reduce (But also Increase) Prejudice. Psychological Science 22(12) 1472–1477.10.1177/0956797611427918
  22. Madva, A. 2013. The Biases Against Debiasing. Paper presented at Implicit Bias, Philosophy and Psychology Conference, Sheffield April 2013.
  23. Moskowitz, G. and Li, P. 2011. Egalitarian Goals Trigger Stereotype Inhibition: A Proactive Form of Stereotype Control, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47: 103–16.10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.014
  24. Moss-Racusin, C., Dovidio, J., Brescoll, V., Graham, M., Handelsman, J. 2012. Science Faculty’s Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students. PNAS 109 (41) 16395-16396.10.1073/pnas.1211286109
  25. Payne, B. K. 2001. Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlling processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181–192.10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.181
  26. Peters, Douglas P., and Stephen J. Ceci. 1982. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:187–255.10.1017/S0140525X00011183
  27. Plant, E. A. and Peruche, B. M. 2005. The consequences of race for police officers’ responses to criminal suspects. Psychological Science, 16, 180–183. Price-Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 109 S. Ct. 1775. (1989).10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00800.x15733196
  28. Rooth, D. 2007. Implicit discrimination in hiring: Real world evidence (IZA Discussion Paper No. 2764). Bonn, Germany: Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (Institute for the Study of Labor).10.2139/ssrn.984432
  29. Saul, J. Forthcoming. Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat and Women in Philosophy. In Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change?, ed. by F. Jenkins and K. Hutchison. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Formerly titled ‘Unconscious Influences and Women in Philosophy’.)
  30. Scheman, N. 2002. Though This be Method, Yet the is Madness in it: Paranoia and Liberal Epistemology. In A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, ed. by L. Antony and C. Witt, Cambridge, MA: Westview.
  31. Steinpreis, R., Anders, K., and Ritzke, D. 1999. The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study. Sex Roles, 41: 7/8, 509–528.10.1023/A:1018839203698
  32. Siegel, S. 2013. Can Selection Effects on Experience Influence its Rational Role? Oxford Studies in Epistemology Vol. 4: 240-270.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672707.003.0009
  33. Stewart, B. D., and Payne, B. K. 2008. Bringing Automatic Stereotyping under Control: Implementation Intentions as Efficient Means of Thought Control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1332-1345.10.1177/014616720832126918660384
  34. Unkelbach, C., Forgas, J. and Denson, T. 2008. The Turban Effect: The Influence of Muslim Headgear and Induced Affect on Aggressive Responses in the Shooter Bias Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44: 5, 1409-1413.10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2013-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2182-2875 | Journal ISSN: 0873-626X
Language: English, Portuguese
Page range: 243 - 263
Submitted on: Oct 23, 2013
Accepted on: Oct 23, 2013
Published on: Dec 31, 2018
Published by: University of Lisbon
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2018 Jennifer Saul, published by University of Lisbon
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.