On What There Must Be: Existence in Logic and Some Related Riddles

Veloso, Paulo A. S.; Pereira, Luiz Carlos; Haeusler, E. Hermann

doi:10.2478/disp-2012-0036

References

Chavineau, Jean. 1979. La logique moderne (2^e édition). Paris: PUF (Coll. “Que sais-je?” 745).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ebbinghaus, H.-D., Flum, J. & Thomas, W. 1984. Mathematical Logic. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Enderton, Herbert B. 1972. A Mathematical Introduction to Logic. New York: Academic Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hume, David. Dialogues on Natural Religion. London: Penguin Classics, 1990.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kant, Immamuel. Lógica. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro (Biblioteca Tempo Universitário 93), 1992.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mendelson, Elliot. 1966. Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Princeton: D. van Nostrand (repr.).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Orenstein, Alex. 1973. On explicating existence in terms of quantification. In Logic and Ontology, ed. by Munitz, Milton K. New York: NYU Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Quine, W V O. 1954. Quantification in the empty domain. Journal of Symbolic Logic 19: 3 (177–179).10.2307/2268615
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shoenfield, Joseph R. 1967. Mathematical Logic. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van Dalen, Dirk. 1989. Logic and Structure (2nd edition, 3rd printing). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Veloso, Paulo A. S., Pereira, Luiz Carlos & Haeusler, Edward H. 2009. Validades existenciais e enigmas relacionados. Dois Pontos.10.5380/dp.v6i2.17336
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

On What There Must Be: Existence in Logic and Some Related Riddles

References

Paradigm

My account