References
- Busch, Jacob. Forthcoming. Can the new indispensability argument be saved from Euclidean rescues? Synthese.
- Colyvan, Mark. 2001. The Indispensability of Mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019513754X.001.0001
- Colyvan, Mark. 2007. Mathematical Recreation Versus Mathematical Knowledge. In Mathematical Knowledge, ed. By M. Leng, A. Paseau, and M. Potter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199228249.003.0007
- Dieterle, Jill. 1999. Mathematical, astrological, and theological naturalism. Philosophia Mathematica 7:129–135.10.1093/philmat/7.2.129
- Field, Hartry.1980. Science without Numbers: a defense of nominalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Leng, Mary. 2010. Mathematics and Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280797.001.0001
- Maddy, Penelope. 1992. Indispensability and Practice. The Journal of Philosophy 89:275-289.10.2307/2026712
- Maddy, Penelope. 1997. Naturalism in Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Maddy, Penelope. 2007. Second Philosophy. A Naturalistic Method. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273669.001.0001
- Paseau, Alexander. 2005. Naturalism and the Authority of Philosophy. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56:377-396.10.1093/bjps/axi123
- Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1953. From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/quin92204
- Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1981. Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1986. Reply to Charles Parsons. In The Philosophy of W.V. Quine, ed. By L. Hahn, and P. Schilpp. Peru, IL: Open Court.
- Tennant, Neil. 2000. What Is Naturalism in Mathematics, Really? Philosophia Mathematica 8:316–38.10.1093/philmat/8.3.316
- Tappenden, Jamie. 2001. Recent Work in Philosophy of Mathematics. The Journal of Philosophy 98:488-497.10.2307/2678496
- Weir, Alan. 2005. Naturalism Reconsidered. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, ed. by S. Shapiro. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195148770.003.0014