Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The weak collective agential autonomy thesis Cover

The weak collective agential autonomy thesis

By: David Botting  
Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Copp, David. 2007. The collective moral autonomy thesis. Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (3):369-38810.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00386.x
  2. Helm, Bennett W. 2008. Plural Agents. Noûs 42 (1): 17-4910.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00672.x
  3. List, Christian and Pettit, Philip. 2006. Group Agency and Supervenience. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):85-105.10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00032.x
  4. Ludwig, Kirk. 2007. The Argument from Normative Autonomy for Collective Agents. Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (3):410-42710.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00388.x
  5. Miller, Seumas. 2007. Against the Collective Moral Autonomy Thesis. Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (3):389-40910.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00387.x
  6. Pettit, Philip. 2004. Groups with minds of their own. In Socializing Metaphysics ed., Frederick Schmitt. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 167-93.
  7. Velleman, J. David. 1997. How to Share an Intention. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):29-50.10.2307/2953776
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2011-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2182-2875 | Journal ISSN: 0873-626X
Language: English, Portuguese
Page range: 215 - 234
Submitted on: Sep 14, 2010
Published on: Dec 31, 2018
Published by: University of Lisbon
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 David Botting, published by University of Lisbon
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.