Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Relevant Alternatives Contextualism and Ordinary Contingent Knowledge Cover

Relevant Alternatives Contextualism and Ordinary Contingent Knowledge

By: Franck Lihoreau  
Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Black, T. 2003. The Relevant Alternatives Theory and Missed Clues. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81: 96-106.10.1080/713659587
  2. Cohen, S. 1998. Contextualist Solutions to Epistemological Problems: Skepticism, Gettier, and the Lottery. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76: 289-306.10.1080/00048409812348411
  3. Cohen, S. 2004. Reply to Baumann. Erkenntnis 61: 429-433.10.1007/s10670-004-9275-5
  4. DeRose, K. 1996. Knowledge, Assertion, and Lotteries. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 568-80.10.1080/00048409612347531
  5. Hawthorne, J. 2002. Lewis, the Lottery, and the Preface. Analysis 62: 242-251.10.1093/analys/62.3.242
  6. Hawthorne, J. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199269556.001.0001
  7. Lewis, D. 1979. Scorekeeping in a Language Game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339-359.10.1007/BF00258436
  8. Lewis, D. 1996. Elusive Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 549-567. Cited as reprinted in Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology (pp. 418-445), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.10.1080/00048409612347521
  9. Schaffer, J. 2001. Knowledge, Relevant Alternatives and Missed Clues. Analysis 61: 202-208.10.1093/analys/61.3.202
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2008-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2182-2875 | Journal ISSN: 0873-626X
Language: English, Portuguese
Page range: 281 - 294
Published on: Dec 31, 2018
Published by: University of Lisbon
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Franck Lihoreau, published by University of Lisbon
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.