Skip to main content

A defence of Fregean propositions Cover

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

A defence of Fregean propositions

Volume 2 (2006): Issue 21 (November 2006)

By: Massimiliano Vignolo

Open Access

|Dec 2018

Abstract

Stephen Schiffer 2003 presents six arguments against the Fregean model of propositions, according to which propositions are (a) the referents of that-clauses and (b) structured entities made out of concepts. Schiffer advances an alternative view: propositions are unstructured pleonastic entities. My purpose is to argue in favour of the main tenets of the Fregean model by countering each of Schiffer’s arguments and sketching the guidelines for a theory of concepts as basic components of propositions.

References

Burge, Tyler. 1977. Belief de re. Journal of Philosophy 74: 338–63.10.2307/2025871
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burge, Tyler. 1979. Frege and the Hierarchy. Synthese 40: 265–81.10.1007/BF00485680
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burge, Tyler. 2005. Postscript to ‘Frege and the Hierarchy’. In T. Burge, Truth, Thought, Reason: Essays on Frege. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005: 167–210.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278534.003.0005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cozzo, Cesare. 1994. Meaning and Argument. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1994.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Davidson, Donald. 1965. Theories of Meaning and Learnable Languages. In Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.), Proceeding’s of the 1964 Congress for Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company. Repr. in his Inquiries into Truth and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984: 3–15.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dummett, Michael. 1973. Frege: Philosophy of Language. London: Duckworth, 1973.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Evans, Gareth. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Horwich, Paul. 1998. Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.10.1093/019823824X.001.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaplan, David. 1969. Quantifying In. In D. Davidson and J. Hintikka, (eds.), Words and Objections. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1969: 206–42.10.1007/978-94-010-1709-1_14
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Künne, Wolfgang. 1997. First Person Propositions: A Fregean Account. In W. Künne, A. Newen, M. Anduschus (eds.) Direct Reference, Indexicality, and Propositional Attitudes. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 1997: 49–67.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McDowell, John. 1984. De Re Senses. The Philosophical Quarterly 34: 283–94.10.2307/2218761
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Parson, Terence. 1981. Frege’s Hierarchies of Indirect Sense and the Paradox of Analysis. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6: 37–57.10.1111/j.1475-4975.1981.tb00427.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Patterson, Douglas. 2002. Theories of Truth and Convention T. Philosophers’ Imprint 2: 1–16.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peacocke, Christopher. 1996. Entitlement, Self-Knowledge and Conceptual Redeployment. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96: 117–58.10.1093/aristotelian/96.1.117
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sainsbury, Mark. 2001. Sense Without Reference. In A. Newen, U. Nortman, R. Stuhlmann-Laeisz (eds.) Building on Frege. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2001: 211–30.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schiffer, Stephen. 1992. Belief Ascription. Journal of Philosophy 89: 499–521.10.2307/2941005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schiffer, Stephen. 1994. A Paradox of Meaning. Nous 28: 279–324.10.2307/2216061
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schiffer, Stephen. 2003. The Things We Mean. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.10.1093/0199257760.001.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zalta, Edward. 1989. Singular Propositions, Abstract Constituents, and Propositional Attitudes. In J. Almog, J. Perry, H. Wettstein (eds.) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford Oxford: University Press, 1989: 455–78.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zalta, Edward. 1993. Replies to the Critics. Philosophical Studies 69: 231–42.10.1007/BF00990087
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zalta, Edward. 2001. Fregean Senses, Modes of Presentations, and Concepts. Philosophical Perspectives 15: 335–59.10.1111/0029-4624.35.s15.15
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2006-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2182-2875 | Journal ISSN: 0873-626X

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English, Portuguese

Page range: 39 - 64

Published on: Dec 31, 2018

Published by: University of Lisbon

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

Related subjects:

Selected philosophical movements,

Analytical philosophy

© 2018 Massimiliano Vignolo, published by University of Lisbon
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 2 (2006): Issue 21 (November 2006)

Previous article