References
- Bhargava, S., Manoli, D. (2015). Psychological frictions and the incomplete take-up of social benefits: Evidence from an IRS field experiment. American Economic Review, 105(11), 3489–3529.
- Blanco, M., Vargas, J. F. (2014). Can SMS technology improve low take-up of social benefits? Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 20(1), 61–81.
- Caminada, K. et al. (2021). Antipoverty Effects of Various Social Transfers and Income Taxes Across Countries. Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 154(3), 1055–1076.
- Doolan, M., Keane, C. (2023). Cliff edges in the Irish tax-benefit system. Economic and Social Research Institute Budget Perspectives, 2024(1), 1–39.
- Edelman, P. B. (2001). Poverty & welfare: Does compassionate conservatism have a heart? Albany Law Review, 64(3), 1073–1083.
- Ko, W., Moffitt, R. A. (2022). Take-Up of Social Benefits. National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper No. w30148.
- Moffitt, R. et al. (2015). Welfare Rules, Incentives, and Family Structure. Journal of Human Resources, 55(1), 1–42.
- Munger, F. W. (2003). Poverty, welfare, and the affirmative state. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 659–686.
- Piven, F. F. (2000). The Link between Welfare Reform and the Labor Market. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law & Social Change, 5(1), 1–20.
- Prowse, V. (2025). Programme interactions and fiscal drag in the UK tax-and-benefit system: effects on income inequality. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 41(1), 140–152.
- Thomas, S. L. (2001). “Ending Welfare as We Know It,” or Farewell to the Rights of Women on Welfare? A Constitutional and Human Rights Analysis of the Personal Responsibility Act. University of Detroit Mercy Law Review, 78(2), 179–202.
- Werner, P., Tur Sinai, A. (2024). Israeli adults’ non take up of social benefits: A study using the socio ecological model. Journal of Social Service Research, 50(2), 1–17. Czech legislation: Act No. 117/1995 Coll., on State Social Support