References
- ACSW, Association of Centres for Social Work (2018). Reorganisation of centres for social work in Slovenia. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from https://www.scsd.si/novice/reorganizacija-centrov-za-socialno-delo.
- Altreiter, C., Leibetseder, B. (2015). Constructing inequality: Deserving and undeserving clients in Austrian social assistance offices. Journal of Social Policy, 44(1), 127–145. doi.org/10.1017/S0047279414000622.
- Auby, J.-B. (Ed.) (2014). Codification of Administrative Procedure. Brussels: Bruylant.
- Austrian Association of Social Workers (2011). Social Work in Austria. Fight for Professionalization. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from http://ccc-tck.org.ua/storage/cso_cc/2.5.pdf.
- Babšek, M., Kovač, P. (2022). Intertwining lawfulness, innovation and transparency in the era of uncertainty: the case of Slovenian prefilled informational calculation of personal income tax. Citizens’ Engagement and Empowerment – the Era of Collaborative Innovation in Governance: 29th NISPAcee Annual Conference. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from https://www.nispa.org/files/conferences/2021/e-proceedings/system_files/papers/NISPAcee21_BabsekKovac_ICPIT.pdf.
- Babšek, M., Tomaževič, N., Kovač, P. (2020). Administrative reforms and the rule of law: case-law analysis as an inspiration for the Slovene reorganisation of social work centres. Croatian and comparative public administration, 20(4), 595–622. doi.org/10.31297/hkju.20.4.1.
- Bertram, G. (2011). Assessing the structure of small welfare states (Vol. 4). Commonwealth Secretariat.
- Bína, D., Moravec, L., Kukalová, G., Mrázová, E., Cvik, D. (2023). Abuse of the Social System in the Czech Republic. Danube, 14(1), 73–88. doi.org/10.2478/danb-2023-0005.
- Bouckaert, G., Nakrosis, V., Nemec, J. (2011). Public administration and management reforms in CEE: Main trajectories and results. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 4(1), 9–29. doi.org/10.2478/v10110-011-0001-9.
- Bouckaert, G., Jann, W. (eds.) (2020). European Perspectives for Public Administration: The Way Forward. Leuven University Press.
- Dan, S., Pollitt, C. (2015). NPM Can Work: An optimistic review of the impact of New Public Management reforms in central and eastern Europe. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1305–1332. /doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.908662.
- De Vries, M., Nemec, J. (2013). Public sector reform: an overview of recent literature and research on NPM and alternative paths. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 4–16. doi.org/10.1108/09513551311293408.
- Ðulabić, V. (2014). New Wine in Old Wineskins: General Administrative Procedure and Public Administration Reform in Croatia. Central European Public Administration Review, 12(2–3), 183–197. doi.org/10.17573/ipar.2014.2-3.a10.
- Ðulabić, V. (2013). Public Administration Reform Strategies in the Western Balkans Countries: Croatia Case. In Public Administration Reform Strategies in Western Balkans. Danilovgrad: Regional School of PA.
- European Commission, Directorate-General for Structural Reform Support (2023). Public administration and governance – Austria. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved December 29, 2023, from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2887/298821.
- European Commission, Directorate-General for Structural Reform Support (2023). Public administration and governance – Croatia. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved December 29, 2023, from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2887/689746.
- European Commission, Directorate-General for Structural Reform Support (2023). Public administration and governance – Slovenia. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved December 29, 2023, from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2887/949125.
- Federal Chancellery of the Republic of Austria (202Com3). National Reform Programme 2023. Retrieved December 29, 2023, from https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:8fd55b2a-f7e9-454e-a5c4-691aa40ced9a/56_11_nb_nrp_2023_en.pdf.
- Federal Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Austria (2023). Austria’s E-Government Strategy 2023. Retrieved December 29, 2023, from https://www.digitalaustria.gv.at/dam/jcr:e93f9913-c1d1-4968-b6c6-ea9aed5c3498/E-GovernmentStrategieOesterreich-EN-final17072023.pdf.
- Galetta, U.-D., Hofmann, H. C. H., Puigpelat, O. M., Ziller, J. (2015). The General Principles of EU Administrative Procedural Law. Brussels: European Parliament.
- Hasenfeld, Y. (2010). Organizational responses to social policy: The case of welfare reform. Administration in Social Work, 34(2), 148–167. doi.org/10.1080/03643101003608976.
- Kekez, A. (2018). Public service reforms and clientelism: explaining variation of service delivery modes in Croatian social policy. Policy and Society, 37(3), 386–404. doi.org/10. 1080/14494035.2018.1436505.
- Koprić, I. (2011). Contemporary Croatian public administration on the reform waves. Godišnjak akademije pravnih znanosti Hrvatske, 2(1), 1–40. https://hrcak.srce.hr/79893.
- Koprić, I., Kovač, P. (2017). European administrative space. Bratislava: NISPAcee.
- Kovač, P. (2020). The rule of law in CEE public administration through the content analysis of selected articles. In The choice-architecture behind policy designs: from policy design to policy practice in the European integration context. NISPAcee. https://www.nispa.org/files/publications/PRACTIC-monograph-final.pdf.
- Kovač, P., Bileišis, M. (eds). (2017). Public administration reforms in Eastern European Union member states: post-accession convergence and divergence. Ljubljana: Faculty of Administration; Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University.
- Kuhlmann, S., Wollmann, H. (2019). Introduction to comparative public administration: administrative systems and reforms in Europe. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
- Machová, Z., Kotlán, I. (2014). Expenditures on collective and individual services: Discussion on the classification of government expenditures with regard to their inclusion into growth models. Danube, 5(4), 287–296. doi.org/10.2478/danb-2014-0016.
- Mania, K. (2022). The Digital Transformation of Legal Industry: Management Challenges and Technological Opportunities. Danube, 13(3), 209–225. doi.org/10.2478/danb-2022-0013.
- Ministry of Justice and Public Administration of the Republic of Croatia (2022). National Plan for the Development of Public Administration 2022–2027. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from https://mpu.gov.hr/UserDocsImages/dokumenti/Strategije,%20planovi,%20izvje%C5%A1%C4%87a/Nacionalni%20plan%20razvoja%20javne%20uprave%20za%20razdoblje%20od%202022_2027.pdf.
- Ministry of Labour, Pension System, Family and Social Policy of the Republic of Croatia (2021). National Plan for the Development of Social Services 2021–2027. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from https://mrosp.gov.hr/UserDocsImages/dokumenti/Glavno%20tajni%C5%A1tvo/Godi%C5%A1nji%20planovi%20i%20strate%C5%A1ka%20izvje%C5%A1%C4%87a/Nacionalni%20plan%20razvoja%20socijalnih%20usluga%20za%20razdoblje%20od%20%202021.%20do%202027.%20godine.pdf.
- Ministry of Public Administration of the Republic of Slovenia (2023). Public Services Strategy 2030. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from https://www.gov.si/assets/ministrstva/MDP/Dokumenti/Strategija_digitalnih_javnih_storitev_2030-1.pdf.
- Ministry of Public Administration of the Republic of Slovenia (2015). Public Administration Development Strategy 2015–2020. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from https://www.gov.si/assets/ministrstva/MJU/Kakovost-in-inovativnost-v-javni-upravi/Strategija/Strategija-razvoja-javne-uprave-2015-2020.pdf.
- Meyer, R. E., Hammerschmid, G. (2006). Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 1000–1014. doi.org/10.1177/0002764205285182.
- Nevická, D., Hamuák, J., Krippel, M. (2021). Parental Leave in the Czech Republic and Slovakia – Where Is It More Favourable to Become a Father? Danube, 12(2), 109–120. doi.org/10.2478/danb-2021-0008.
- Pečarič, M. (2021). Good Regulation Reflects Words in Action. Danube, 12(3), 159–182. doi.org/10.2478/danb-2021-0011.
- Pennerstorfer, A., Zierer, B. (2018). Country profile Austria: Social Policy, Social Economy and Social Work. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from https://www.socialnet.de/en/international/austria.html.
- Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: University Press.
- Potts, J., Kastelle, T. (2010). Public sector innovation research: What’s next? Innovation, 12(2), 122–137. hdoi.org/10.5172/impp.12.2.122.
- Raadschelders, J. C. N., Vigoda-Gadot, E., Kisner, M. (2015). Global dimensions of public administration and governance: a comparative voyage. New Jersey: Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Brand.
- Ranchordás, S. (2021). Empathy in the Digital Administrative State. Duke Law Journal, 1341–1389. dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3946487.
- Ranchordás, S. (2020). The digitalization of government and digital exclusion: Setting the scene. In Ferreira Mendes G., Blanco de Morais, C. (Eds.). Direito Publico e Internet: Democracia, Redes Sociais e Regulação do Ciberespaço (Public Governance 4.0). FGV Publicacoes/IDP/Univ. Lisboa.
- Randma-Liiv, T., Drechsler, W. (2017). Three decades, four phases: Public administration development in Central and Eastern Europe, 1989–2017. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6–7), 595–605. doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2017-0175.
- Republic of Croatia, Central State Office for the Development of the Digital Society (2022). Digital Croatia Strategy for the period until 2023. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from https://rdd.gov.hr/UserDocsImages/SDURDD-dokumenti/Strategija_Digitalne_Hrvatske_final_v-1_EN.pdf.
- Rusch, W. (2014). Citizens first: Modernisation of the system of administrative procedures in South-Eastern Europe. Croatian and comparative public administration, 14(1), 189–228. https://hrcak.srce.hr/129777.
- Strehl, F., Hugl, U. (1997). Administrative reform in Austria: public administration management as an organizational development process. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 10(3), 228–239. doi.org/10.1108/09513559710166075.
- The Government of the Republic of Austria (2020). Government Programme 2020–2024. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/en/federal-chancellery/the-austrian-federal-government/government-documents.html.
- The Government of the Republic of Slovenia (2017). Slovenian Development Strategy 2030. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from https://www.gov.si/assets/ministrstva/MKRR/Strategija-razvoja-Slovenije-2030/Strategija_razvoja_Slovenije_2030.pdf.
- Tomaževič, N. (2019). Social responsibility and consensus orientation in public governance: a content analysis. Central European public administration review, 17(2), 189–204. doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2019.2.09.
- Urbanc, K., Ajduković, M. (2010). Novi model rada centara za socijalnu skrb: Izazovi i preporuke. Ljetopis Socijalnog Rada/Annual of Social Work, 17(3), 353–389. https://hrcak.srce.hr/64353.
- Venice Commission – European Commission for Democracy through Law (2016). The Rule of Law Checklist. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from https://www.venice.coe.int/images/SITE%20IMAGES/Publications/Rule_of_Law_Check_List.pdf.
- Venice Commission – European Commission for Democracy through Law (2011). Stock-taking on the Notions of “Good Governance” and “Good Administration”, Study no. 470/2008, CDL-AD(2001)009.
- Wimmer, N. (2007). Reform of Public Administration in Austria Activities and Perspectives. Croatian and comparative public administration, 7(3), 635–657. https://hrcak.srce.hr/135362.
- Žganec, N. (2008). Socijalna skrb u Hrvatskoj – smjerovi razvoja i reformi. Croatian journal of social policy, 15(3), 379–393. doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v15i3.778.