Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Unveiling the Variation in Corporate Tax Base Distribution Under the Formulary Apportionment Cover

Unveiling the Variation in Corporate Tax Base Distribution Under the Formulary Apportionment

Open Access
|Oct 2024

References

  1. Bettendorf, L., Devereux, M. P., van der Horst, A., Loretz, S., de Mooij, R. A. (2010). Corporate tax harmonization in the EU. Economic Policy, 63, 537–590.
  2. Clausing, K. A., Lahav, Y. (2011). Corporate tax payments under formulary apportionment: Evidence from the financial reports of 50 major U.S. multinational firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 20(2), 97–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2011.06.004.
  3. Cobham, A., Janský, P., Jones, C., Temouri, Y. (2021). An evaluation of the effects of the European Commission's proposals for the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base. Transnational Corporations, 28(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.18356/2076099x-28-1-2.
  4. Cobham, A., Loretz, S. (2014). International distribution of the corporate tax base: Implications of different apportionment factors under unitary taxation. International Centre for Tax and Development Working Paper, 2014 (27).
  5. de Mooij, R., Liu, L., Prihardini, D. (2021). An Assessment of Global Formula Apportionment. National Tax Journal, 74(2), 431–465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/714112.
  6. Devereux, M. P., Loretz, S. (2008). The effects of EU formula apportionment on corporate tax revenues. Fiscal Studies, 29(1), 1–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2008.00-067.x.
  7. Domonkos, T., Domonkos, Š., Dolinajcová, M., Grisáková, N. (2013). The effect of the formula apportionment of the common consolidated corporate tax base on tax revenue in the Slovak Republic. Ekonomickýčasopis, 61(5), 453–467.
  8. Edmiston, K. D., del Granado, F. J. A. (2006). Economic Effects of Apportionment Formula Changes Results from a Panel of Corporate Income Tax Returns. Public Finance Review, 34(5), 483–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1091142106289016.
  9. European Commission (2016). Impact Assessment accompanying the document Proposals for a Council Directive on a Common Corporate Tax Base and a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB). Commission Staff Working Document. SWD (2016) 341 final.
  10. Fuest, C., Hemmelgarn, T., Ramb, F. (2007). How would the introduction of an EU-wide formula apportionment affect the distribution and size of the corporate tax base? An analysis based on German multinationals. International Tax and Public Finance, 14(5), 605–626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-9008-6.
  11. Gupta, S., Moore, J., Gramlich, J., Hofmann, M. A. (2009). Empirical Evidence on the Revenue Effects of State Corporate Income Tax Policies. National Tax Journal, 62(2), 237–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2009.2.03.
  12. Hines, J. R. (2008). Income Misattribution under Formula Apportionment. European Economic Review, 54(1), 108–120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.011.
  13. Hodzic, S. (2015). The Impacts of the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base in Croatia. Ekonomski Vjesnik, 28(2), 327–338.
  14. Hundsdoerfer, J., Wagner, J. (2020). How accurately does the CCCTB apportionment formula allocate profits? An evaluation of the European Commission proposal. Journal of Business Economics, 90(4), 495–536, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11573-019-00962-1.
  15. Krchnivá, K., Nerudová, D. (2018). The CCCTB Allocation formula game: The Performance of Economic Sectors. Prague Economic Papers, 27(4), 427–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.660.
  16. Mardan, M., Stimmelmayr, M. (2018). Tax revenue losses through cross-border loss offset: An insurmountable hurdle for formula apportionment? European Economic Review, 102, 188–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.12.007.
  17. Martins, A., Taborda, D. (2022). BEFIT and Formulary Apportionment: Should Intangibles Be Included in the Formula? EC Tax Review, 31(3), 131–139, https://doi.org/10.54648/ECTA2022013.
  18. Matheson, T., Beer, S., Coelho, M., Liu, L., Luca, O. (2021). Formulary Apportionment in Theory and Practice. In R. De Mooij, A. Klemm, Perry, V. (Eds.). Corporate Income Taxes under Pressure – Corporate Income Taxes under Pressure. Why Reform Is Needed and How It Could Be Designed, 283–252. International Monetary Fund, ISBN 9781513511771.
  19. Mintz, J. (2008). Europe Slowly Lurches to a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base: Issues at Stake. In: Lang, M. et al. (Eds.). A Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base for Europe. Alemanha: Springer, 128–138, ISBN 978-3-540-79483-7.
  20. Nerudová D., Solilová, V. (2017). Common consolidated corporate tax base system re-launching: Simulation of the impact on the Slovak budget revenues. Ekonomickýčasopis, 65(6), 559–578.
  21. Nerudová D., Solilová, V. (2019). The Impact of the Introduction of a CCCTB in the EU. Intereconomics, 54(3), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-019-0815-2.
  22. Nerudová, D., Solilová, V. (2015). The Impact of The CCCTB Introduction on The Distribution of the Group Tax Bases Across The EU: The Study for The Czech Republic. Prague Economic Papers, 24(6), 621–637. http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.514.
  23. Nerudová, D., Solilová, V. (2018). Mandatory CCCTB Implementation in the Eurozone and its Impact on Corporate Tax Revenues in the Czech Republic. E & M Ekonomie a Management, 21(1), 4–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2018-1-001.
  24. Nerudová, D., Solilová, V., Litzman, M. (2021). Is there a Real Chance to Adopt the CCCTB without UK Participation in the EU? Ekonomickýčasopis, 69(6), 582–603. http://dx.doi.org/10.31577/ekoncas.2021.06.02.
  25. Oestreicher, A., Koch, R. (2011). The Revenue Consequences of Using a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base to Determine Taxable Income in the EU Member States. Finanzarchiv, 67(1), 64–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1628/001522111X574191.
  26. Pethig, R., Wagener, A. (2007). Profit tax competition and formula apportionment. International Tax and Public Finance, 14(6), 631–655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-9017-5.
  27. Pirvu, D., Banica L., Hagiu, A. (2011). Implications of the common consolidated corporate tax base introduction on tax revenues (case study on Romania). Romanian Journal of Political Science, 11(1), 91–102.
  28. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2023). Worldwide Tax Summaries: Corporate income tax (CIT) due dates. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com (1 May 2023).
  29. Riedel, N. (2010). The downside of formula apportionment: evidence on factor demand distortions. International Tax and Public Finance, 17(3), 236–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.10-07/s10797-009-9116-1.
  30. Roggeman, A., Verleyen, I., Van Cauwenberge, P., Coppens, C. (2012). An empirical investigation into the design of an EU apportionment formula related to profit generating factors. Transformations in Business & Economics, 11(3), 36–56.
  31. Shackelford, D., Slemrod, J. (1998). The revenue consequences of using formula apportionment to calculate US and foreign-source income: A firm-level analysis. International Tax and Public Finance, 5(1), 41–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008664408465.
  32. Solilová, V., Nerudová, D., Litzman, M. (2016). Implementation of Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base and its Implications for Non-participating Country: A Case Study for the Czech Republic. Ekonomickýčasopis, 64(3), 282–298.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2024-0012 | Journal eISSN: 1804-8285 | Journal ISSN: 1804-6746
Language: English
Page range: 203 - 220
Published on: Oct 11, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Markéta Mlčúchová, published by European Association Comenius - EACO
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.