Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Hungary and Refugee: From Historical to Legal Development Cover

Hungary and Refugee: From Historical to Legal Development

Open Access
|Apr 2024

References

  1. Ablonczy, B. (2020). The Refugee Experience after the Treaty of Trianon. Between State Practices and Neglect., 9(1), 69–89. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26984102.
  2. Adesina, M., Adeel, M., Omigbile, O., Abiodun, A., Adehunoluwa, E., Oladele, R., Olufadewa, I., Abudu, F., Onathoja, O., Adeyelu, N. (2021). Trends and Drivers of Refugees in Africa., 6(1). em0093. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejeph/11379.
  3. AIDA (2020).. Geneva.
  4. Amnesty International (2015)., 1–26. https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/EUR2726142015-ENGLISH.pdf.
  5. Anderson, J. (2007, 2005). Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees – For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights’ Compilation Report., 3rd Cycle, 31st Session.
  6. Araźna, M. (2020).. Challenges to Human Security in the Arab Countries Nations Development Programme Regional Bureau for Arab States. http://iris-bg.org/files/stID-2-07-1.pdf.
  7. Armstrong, A. B. (2019). Chutes and Ladders: Nonrefoulement and the Sisyphean Challenge of Seeking Asylum in Hungary. https://perma.cc/8V7X-DM64.
  8. Bahri, M. T. (2023). Assessing EU Readiness to Manage Ukrainian Refugees: From Openness to Legal Limitation., 14(2), 131–152. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2023-0009.
  9. Bahri, M. T. (2022). Understanding The Pattern of International Migration: Challenges in Human Right Protection., 38(2), 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jh.v38i2.21337.
  10. Bajomi-Lázár, P. (2019). An Anti-Migration Campaign and Its Impact on Public Opinion: The Hungarian Case., 34(6) (December 1, 2019), 619–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119886152.
  11. Bárd, P., Bárd, K. (2016).. Budapest: Eötvös Lóránd University. Retrieved from http://real.mtak.hu/65944/1/
  12. Bard Bard Comparative study on the implementation of the ECHR at the national level ENG 149 168 u.pdf.
  13. Bauerová, H. (2018). Migration Policy of the V4 in the Context of Migration Crisis., 14(2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2018-0011.
  14. Békés, C., Kalmár, M. (2001). The Political Transition in Hungary, 1989–90., no. 12/13, 73–164.
  15. Bernát, A., Fekete, Z., Sik, E., Tóth, J. (2019). Borders and the Mobility of Migrants in Hungary., 29. Available at http://ceaseval.eu/publications/29WP4Hungary.pdf.
  16. Bjarnason, M. (1995)..
  17. Boros, T. (2018). The Hungarian “Stop Soros” Act: Why Does the Government Fight Human Rights Organisations? https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/budapest/14205.pdf.
  18. Bozóki, A. (2016). The Independent Historical Memory of the Hungarian Democratic Opposition.
  19. Collett, E., Le Coz, C. (2018). After the Storm: Learning from the EU Responses. Brussels. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/EUCrisisResponseFINALWEB.pdf.
  20. Colville, R. (2006). Fiftieth Anniversary of the Hungarian Uprising and Refugee Crisis. UNHCR Stories. https://www.unhcr.org/news/stories/fiftieth-anniversary-hungarian-uprising-and-refugee-crisis.
  21. Czina, V. (2021). Hungary as a Norm Entrepreneur in Migration Policy., 7(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v7i1.666.
  22. Demeny, G. (2007). Intgeration of Refugees in Hungary., 1(1), 116–112.
  23. Desimpelaere, K. (2014). The Dublin Regulation: Past, Present, Future.. https://libstore.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/002/213/386/RUG01-00221338620150001AC.pdf%0Ahttps://lib.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/002/213/386/RUG01-002213386201500-01AC.pdf.
  24. Dimitriadi, A., Kaya, A., Kale, B., Zurabishvili, T. (2018). EU-Turkey Relations and Irregular Migration: Transactional Cooperation in the Making ‘EU-Turkey Relations and Irregular Migration: Transactional Cooperation in the Making’ Content. Cologne.
  25. ECRE (2015). The New Asylum Procedure at the Border and Restrictions to Accessing Protection in Hungary. Helsinki, September 2015.
  26. Frank, T. (2016). Migrations in the Hungarian History.. https://hungarianreview.com/article/20160114_migrations_in_hungarian_history_part_i.
  27. Gödri, I., Soltész, B., Bodacz-Nagy, B. (2014). Immigration or Emigration Country? Migration Trends and Their Socio-Economic Background in Hungary: A Longer-Term Historical Perspective.. https://ideas.repec.org/p/nki/wpaper/19.html%0Ahttps://ideas.repec.org//p/nki/wpaper/19.html.
  28. Government of Hungary (2011). Hungary’s Constitution of 2011, Pub. L. No. Act CLIX of 2011, 1.
  29. Halmai, G. (1998). The Reform of Constitutional Law in Hungary after the Transition., 18(2), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1998.tb00012.x.
  30. Hilpold, P. (2017). Quotas as an Instrument of Burden-Sharing in International Refugee Law: The Many Facets of an Instrument Still in the Making., 15(4), 1188–1205. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox086.
  31. Hungarian Helsinki Commitee (2015). Asylum in Hungary.
  32. Ibbetson, D. (2012). Comparative Legal History: A Methodology. In, edited by Anthony Musson and Chantal Stebbings, 131–145. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028578.010.
  33. Jeszenszky, G. (2020). The Controversy About 1944 in Hungary and the Escape of Budapest’s Jews from Deportation. A Response., 13, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.5195/ahea.2020.388.
  34. Kapitany, B. (2015). Ethnic Hungarians in the Neighbouring. In, 225–239.
  35. Karolewski, I. P., Benedikter, R. (2018). Europe’s Refugee and Migrant Crisis: Political Responses to Asymmetrical Pressures., 60. https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.060.0098.
  36. Kaufmann, D. (2021). Debating Responsibility-Sharing: An Analysis of the European Parliament’s Debates on the Common European Asylum System., 7(1), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1087.
  37. Kligman, G., Brubaker, R. (2000). The Ethnicization of Ethiopian Politics, 0–48.
  38. Koloh, G. (2021). The Number of Trianon Refugees., 11(4), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.15196/RS110408.
  39. Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects., 7(1), 23.
  40. Moraga, J. F. H., Rapoport, H. (2015). Tradable Refugee-Admission Quotas, Matching and the New European Agenda for Migration., 13(2), 50–56.
  41. Murádin, J. K. (2021). The Problem of Transylvania in the Emigration Correspondence of Count Béla Teleki from the End of the Second World War to the Abolition of the Communist Regime., 19(1), 14–39. https://doi.org/10.2478/auseur-2021-0002.
  42. Myers, G. (2020). Contradictory Explanations and Elusive Answers: The Historiography of the Sarajevo Assassination Contradictory Explanations and Elusive Answers: The Historiography of the Sarajevo Assassination 1.
  43. National Assembly of Hungary (1949). Act XX of 1949 The Constitution of the Republic of Hungary, Pub. L. No. XX, 1. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/hu/hu047en.pdf.
  44. Nyyssonen, H. (2020). Salami Reconstructed ‘Goulash Communism’ and Political Culture in Hungary., 47, no. July (2020): 1–23.
  45. Peterffy, G. (2019). The Impact of The Treaty of Trianon on Hungarian Infrastructure., 4(2–4), 61–75.
  46. Salgado, A. (2019). Making Friends and Making Out: The Social and Romantic Lives of Young Communists in Chile (1958–1973)., 76(2), 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/tam.2018.95.
  47. Schanda, B. (2022). The Christian Roots of Hungary’s Fundamental Law., 3(1), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.47078/2022.1.195-202.
  48. Seleny, A. (2014). Revolutionary Road: 1956 and the Fracturing of Hungarian Historical Memory. Edited by Michael Bernhard and Jan Kubik.. Oxford University Press, July 29, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199375-134.003.0003.
  49. Stepper, P. (2016). The Visegrad Group and the EU Agenda on Migration: A Coalition of the Unwilling?, 1(1), 1. https://journals.lib.unicorvinus.hu/index.php/cojourn/article/view/27.
  50. Subhan, A. (1998). Migration and Asylum in Central and Eastern Europe, 1–5.
  51. Szalai, A., Gőbl, G. (2015). Securitizing Migration in Contemporary Hungary, 1–33.
  52. Tarımcı, E. A. (2005). The Role Of Geographical Limitation With Respect To Asylum And Refugee Policies Within The Context Of Turkey’s EU Harmonization Process, no. December (2005).
  53. Toscano, F. (2013). The Second Phase of the Common European Asylum System. Trakilovic, M. (2019). “On this path to Europe” – the symbolic role of the ‘Balkan corridor’ in the European migration debate. In, 49–63. London: Routledge.
  54. UNHCR (2022). Global Trends Forced Displacement in 2022. Brussel, December 5, 2022.
  55. Urbański, M. (2022). Comparing Push and Pull Factors Affecting Migration., 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010021.
  56. Visnovitz, P., Jenne, E. K. (2021). Populist Argumentation in Foreign Policy: The Case of Hungary under Viktor Orbán, 2010–2020., 19(6), 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-021-00256-3.
  57. Voiculescu, C. (2004). Temporary Migration of Transylvanian Roma to Hungary., 148–166.
  58. Young, C., Light, D. (2016). Multiple and Contested Geographies of Memory: Remembering the 1989 Romanian ‘Revolution’., 56–73. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315685168-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2024-0003 | Journal eISSN: 1804-8285 | Journal ISSN: 1804-6746 (formerly 1804-8285)
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 72
Published on: Apr 10, 2024
Published by: European Research University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Mohammad Thoriq Bahri, published by European Research University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.