Advocates and Legal Advisers in Civil Proceedings in Kazakhstan: Is Advocate Monopoly Required?
References
- Abel, R. L. (1985).. Regents of the University of California.
- Au, T. I., Kinsfather, A. S. (2019). Problems of improving legislative regulations of the advocate institute in the Republic of Kazakhstan. In(pp. 9–13). Kazan Federal University. Available at https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41146600.
- Bakayanova, N. M. (2015). On the prospects of a lawyer’s monopoly., 10–11(50), 134–140.
- Belik, V. N. (2009). Legal aspects of exercise of the constitutional right to competent legal assistance., 7, 106–109.
- Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (2000).. Available at https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?docid=30188533&pos=3;-108#pos=3;-108.
- Council of Europe (2018).. CEPEJ studies. Available at https://rm.coe.int/rapport-avec-couv-18-09-2018-en/16808def9c.
- Court of Iceland (1998).. Available at https://www.althingi.is/lagas/nuna/1998077.html.
- Davis, M. F. (2007). Human rights in the trenches: Using international human rights law in everyday legal assistance cases., 41, 414–426.
- Dunlap, B. (2013). Anyone can think like a lawyer: How the lawyers’ monopoly on legal understanding undermines democracy and the rule of law in the United States., 82, 2817–2842.
- Federal Chamber of Advocates of the Russian Federation (2018).. FPA. Available at https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/yaponskaya-model-advokatury.
- Government of France (1971).. Available at https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/articlelc/LEGIARTI000031008982.
- Government of France (2023).. Available at https://www.legi-france.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGITEXT000006070716.
- Gurbanova, N. H., Raspopin, S. V., Yurtaev, N. S., Bardokin, D. A. (2020). Topical issues of competent legal assistance in the post-Soviet space., 3(15), 257–269.
- Hagerty, R. J. (2021).. The Wall Street Journal. Available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/professor-aimed-to-break-lawyers-monopoly-on-legal-services-11611932403.
- International Bar Association (2014).. International Bar Association: 2014.
- Jadalhaq, I. M., Abdulhay, I. E., Alqodsi, E. M., El Maknouzi, M. E. H. (2023). A systematic reviews and meta-analyses of interruption of the statute of limitations for civil claims: A comparative study of Arab legislations., 9(6), 16756. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16756.
- Kaluzhskikh, D. P. (2017). Lawyer’s monopoly in Russia: Pluses and minuses., 1, 96–99. Available at https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_31738555_58442513.pdf.
- Kirby, T. (2022).. The Regulatory Review. Available at https://www.theregreview.org/2022/02/09/kirby-piercing-lawyer-monopoly.
- Knake, R. N. (2018). The legal monopoly., 93, 1293–1337.
- Kratenko, M. V. (2013). Accessibility of legal assistance and some types of contracts on its rendering. In(Vol. 2, pp. 117–121). Novosibirsk.
- Lavitskaya, M. I. (2020). Qualified legal assistance in some foreign states: current state and features of its provision. In(pp. 14–21). All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Documentation and Archival Business. Available at https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44187659.
- Levin, L. C. (2013). The monopoly myth and other tales about the superiority of lawyers., 82, 2611–2634.
- Momotov, V. V. (2017). The market of judicial representation: From experience of continental and Anglo-Saxon legal tradition., 4(65), 43–51.
- Parliament of Georgia (1997).. Available at https://matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/view/29962?publication=154.
- Republic of Belarus (2011).. Available at https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?docid=31101754&pos=5;-108#pos=5;-108.
- Republic of Kazakhstan (1995).. Available at https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?docid=1005029.
- Republic of Kazakhstan (2007).. Available at https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?docid=30086115.
- Republic of Kazakhstan (2014).. Available at https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?docid=31577399.
- Republic of Kazakhstan (2015).. Available at https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?docid=34329053.
- Republic of Kazakhstan (2017).. Available at https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?docid=39611738.
- Republic of Kazakhstan (2018).. Available at https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?docid=33024087.
- Republic of Kazakhstan (2021).. Available at https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?docid=37971200&pos=5;-108#pos=5;-108.
- Republic of Moldova (2013).. Available at https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?docid=133060&lang=ro.
- Republic of Moldova (2018).. Available at https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?docid=134478&lang=ro#.
- Republic of Uzbekistan (2018).. Available at https://lex.uz/docs/-3517337.
- Rhode, D. L. (2015).. Oxford University Press.
- Riabov, D. (2021). On revocation of the lawyer’s monopoly through introducing the professional institution of legal advisers., 17(3), 155–166. Available at https://doi.org/10.15804/rop2021309.
- Sen, G. (2019). Beyond the JD: How eliminating the legal profession’s monopoly on legal services can address the access-to-justice crisis., 22, 121–147.
- Solovyov, A. A. (2016). Qualification requirements for representatives in administrative court proceedings (foreign experience)., 2(92), 137–144.
- Steinberg, J. K., Carpenter, A. E., Shanahan, C. F., Mark, A. (2020). Judges and the deregulation of the lawyer’s monopoly., 89, 1315–1349.
- Suleimenov, M. K. (2021).Available at https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?docid=37756099.
- Sultanov, R. R. (2021). Institute of representation in the Republic of Kazakhstan: Problems and prospects. In S. K. Leshchenko (Ed.).(pp. 386–394). Minsk: RIVSH. Available at https://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/274319.
- Trabucco, L. (2018). Lawyers’ monopoly: think again: The reality of non-lawyer legal service provision in Canada., 96, 460–478.
- Vereshchagin, A. N. (2017). About assessing the validity of the advocate monopoly., 2, 152–179.
- Zaikov, D. E. (2020). Prohibition of judicial representation: Legal regulation issues and peculiarities of application., 1(40), 155–164.
- Zhamburbaeva, S. (2022). Some issues of legislative regulation of the institute of judicial representation in the Republic of Kazakhstan., 1(105), 140–149.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2024-0002 | Journal eISSN: 1804-8285 | Journal ISSN: 1804-6746 (formerly 1804-8285)
Language: English
Page range: 24 - 46
Published on: Apr 10, 2024
Published by: European Research University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2024 Sabina Zhamburbayeva, Gulzhazira Ilyassova, published by European Research University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.