Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Protecting Human Rights Through Fundamental Principles of Administrative Procedures in Eastern Europe Cover

Protecting Human Rights Through Fundamental Principles of Administrative Procedures in Eastern Europe

DANUBE
Volume 5 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Feb 2015
References

References

  1. Apelblat, M. (2011). Reflections on reforms of administrative procedures in Western Balkans. Regional School of Public Administration annual Conference: “Modernising Administrative Procedures, meeting EU Standards”, 40-49.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Ávila, H. (2007).Law and Philosophy Library Volume 81. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands: Springer.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, J. (2010). Toward a Third Generation of Administrative Procedure. In Rose-Ackerman, S. and Lindseth, P.L. (eds.).cop. 2010. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Britannica Academic. (2014).Retrieved October 11, 2014, from http://academic.eb.com/bps/additionalcontent/8/116846/De-claration-of-the-Rights-of-Man-and-of-the-Citizen.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Cardona, F. (2005). Checklist for general law on administrative procedures. SIGMA. CARDS 2003 project: Support to the Public Administration and Civil Service Reform. Retrieved April 10, 2014, from http://www.delhrv.ec.europa.eu/?lang=en&content=287.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Davitkovski, B., and Pavlovska-Daneva, A. (2009). Realizing Citizens' Rights through the Administrative Procedure and Administrative Dispute in the Republic of Macedonia., 9 (1), 125-140.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Davitkovski, B., and Pavlovska-Daneva, A. (2010). The European Administrative Space as a Challenge for Public Administration Reform in the Republic of Macedonia., 11(1), 127-146.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2001). European Commission's White Paper on European Governance, COM(2001) 428 final, 25.7.2001. Retrieved October 11, 2014, from http://aei.pitt. edu/1188/1/european_governance_wp_COM_2001 _428.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. European Commission (2012). Commission Staff Working Document, “The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 2012 Progress Report”, Brussels 10.10.2012, SWD(2012) 332 final.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. European Commission (1995). Preparation of the Associated Countries of Central and Eastern Europe for Integration into the Internal Market of the Union - White Paper. COM (95) 163 final, 3 May 1995. Retrieved October 10,2014, from http://aei.pitt.edu/1120/1/east_en-larg_wp_COM_95_163.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Galligan, D. J., Langan, R. H. II, and Nicandrou, C. S. (1998).Oxford: Open Society Institute, Constitutional and Legislative Policy Institute and the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Grafenauer, B., and Breznik, J. (2009).Ljubljana: Gospodarski vestnik.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Hirsch-Ziembińska, M. (2007). The application of the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour by the European Institutions. In Pursuit of Good Administration, Council of Europe, 29-30 November, Warsaw, Poland, 1-10.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Hladík, J., Kopecký, V. (2013).Association for International Affairs, 2013. Retrieved October 14,2014, from http://www.amo.cz/ editor/image/stranky3 _soubory/rp_par-in-ua-and-by_2013 _2_czech-republic.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Hus, G., and Katić Bubaš, J. (2011). Novelties in the general administrative procedure act and its application in Croatia. Regional School of Public Administration annual Conference: “Modernising Administrative Procedures, meeting EU Standards”, 19-29.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Iancu, D.C. (2012). Re(De)-Forming public administration: an expert outlook on reform planning in Romania., XIX (8(573)), 103-124. Kerševan, E. (2008). Vladavina prava in upravno pravo [Rule of Law and Administrative Law].No. 6-7, 1131-1140.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Koprić, I. (2005). Administrative Procedures on the Territory of Former Yugoslavia. Paper presented at the Regional Workshop on Public Administration Reform and EU Integration, in Budva, Montenegro. Retrieved October 16,2014, from http://www.sigmaweb.org/publi-cations/36366473.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Kovač, P. (2011). Modernizing administrative procedural law in Slovenia as a driving force of efficient and good administration., 4 (2), 39-66.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Kovač, P. (2013). Slovene Administrative reforms: at the cross-section of post-socialism, legalism and good administration. In Vintar, M.; Rosenbaum, A.; Jenei, G.; Drechsler, W. (eds.).Bratislava: NISPAcee Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Künnecke, M. (2007).Berlin, New York: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Lampe, R. (2010).Ljubljana: Uradni list Republike Slovenije.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Loughlin, J.; Hendriks, F. and Lindström, A. (eds.) (2011).New York: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Mendes, J. (2009). Good Administration in EU Law and the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour.1-19.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Nikolov, D. (2013). Public Administration and Public Administration Reform in the Western Balkan Countries. In Vintar, M.; Rosenbaum, A.; Jenei, G.; Drechsler, W. (eds.).Bratislava: NISPAcee Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Novak, A. (2010). Zmuzljiva narava pravnih načel [Elusive Nature of Legal Principles].
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Olson, J. P. (2002). The Many Faces of Europeanisation., 40(5), 921-952.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Pavčnik, M. (1997).Ljubljana: Cankarjeva založba. Pavčnik, M. (ed.) (2009).Ljubljana: GV Založba.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Petrov, R., Kalinichenko, P. (2011). The europeanization of third country judiciaries through the application of the EU acquis: the cases of Russia and Ukraine., Vol. 60, 325-353.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Pollitt, C., and Bouckaert, G. (2011).Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Pouperová, O. (2014). Hauser Global Law School Program, New York University School of Law.Retrieved October 13, 2014, from http://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/czech_republic.htm
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Public Administration Reform Strategy 2010-2015, Republic of Macedonia, 2010. Radaelli, C. M. and Featherstone, K. (eds.) (2003).New York: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Rusch, W. (2009). Administrative Procedures in EU Member States. Paper presented at the Conference on Public Administration Reform and European Integration, SIGMA, 26-27 March, Budva, Montenegro. Retrieved October 16, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/data-oecd/49/34/42754772.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Rusch, W. (2011). Citizens first, Good administration through general administrative procedures. Regional School of Public Administration annual Conference: “Modernising Administrative Procedures, meeting EU Standards”, 3-18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Savino, M. (2010).Sigma Paper No. 46. Paris: SIGMA, 1-40.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Schuppert, G. F. (2000).Baden-Baden: Nomos.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Schwarze, J. (1992).Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Schwarze, J. (2004). Judicial Review of European Administrative Procedure., 85-105.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Schwarze, J. (2011). European Administrative Law in the Light of the Treaty of Lisbon: Introductory Remarks. Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizen's Rights and Constitutional Affairs, Legal Affairs, Workshop on EU Administrative Law: State of Play and Future Prospects (León, Spain), Briefing Notes, European Parliament, 7-27.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. SIGMA. (1999). European Principles for Public Administration, Paper No. 27, CCNM/SIG-MA/PUMA(99)44/REV1.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. SIGMA. (2012). Assessment Reports on the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Retrieved October 14, 2014, from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/sigma-country-assessment-reports_22260005;jsessionid=26eyiwrqh9pnm.x-oecd-live-01. Skulová, S.; Husseini, F.; Vrbová, M; and Prokopová, K. (2011). Principles of good governance as a factor in effective decision-making by administrative authorities and administrative courts, with accent on the principle of predictability and stability of decision-making (“Czech Republic” case study). EGPA Annual Conference, Study Group Law and Public Administration, 7-9 September, Bucharest, Romania, 1-16.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Staša, J., and Tomášek, M. (2012). Codification of administrative procedure., 2, 59-68.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Statskontoret (2005).Retrieved October 16,2014, from http://www.statskontoret.se/upload/Publika-tioner/2005/200504.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Todevski, M. (2011). Reforming administrative procedures in the Republic of Macedonia. Regional School of Public Administration annual Conference: “Modernising Administrative Procedures, meeting EU Standards”, 25-29.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. University of Strasbourg, Centre for European Political Sociology. Hadjiisky, M. (2009).Retrieved October 14,2014, from http://prisme.u-strasbg.fr/workingpapers/WPHadjiisky.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Venice Commission (2011). Venice Commission - European Commission for Democracy through Law. Stocktaking on the Notions of »Good Governance« and »Good Administration«, Study no. 470/2008, CDL-AD(2001)009. Retrieved October 16, 2014, from http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/CDL-AD(2011)009.aspx.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Vidláková, O. (2006).Retrieved October 11, 2014, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/ public/documents/nispacee/unpan024319.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Ziller, J. (2009, cop. 2007). The Continental System of Administrative Legality. In B. Guy, B. P. and Pierre, J. (eds.).Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: SAGE.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2014-0014 | Journal eISSN: 1804-8285 | Journal ISSN: 1804-6746 (formerly 1804-8285)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 249 - 275
Published on: Feb 2, 2015
Published by: European Research University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Administrative Procedures,
Eastern Europe,
Good Governance,
Human Rights,
Principles,
Rule of Law_
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Macroeconomics,
Economic policy,
Law,
European law,
European law, other,
Law, other

© 2015 Tina Sever, Iztok Rakar, Polonca Kovač, published by European Research University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 5 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)
Previous article
Next article